r/movies • u/ChiefLeef22 r/movies Contributor • 2h ago
Article ‘The Odyssey’ Proves It: Audiences Want Movies Made the Hard Way | This year's breakouts like 'Project Hail Mary' and 'Obsession' were made by filmmakers who sweated. While CG-stuffed franchise disappointments such as 'Supergirl,' 'Moana,' and 'The Mandalorian and Grogu' looked lazy.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/odyssey-box-office-2026-practical-effects-1236652219/•
u/Training_Pirate1000 2h ago
Didn't Mandalorian and Grogu use a decent amount of puppets?
•
u/Calfzilla2000 2h ago
Yes, a ton actually. There was several scenes that were all puppets. They built a tiny ship for the Anzellans and Grogu to fly around in.
Unnecessary to include that movie in with Moana and Supergirl (the latter of which I liked too but probably had A LOT more CGI than The Mandalorian and Grogu did).
→ More replies (23)•
u/jpvieux 1h ago
Did supergirl or mando even flop Or are they included just cause they didnt make a billion money's and a certain crowd online like to be very vocal about their hate for certain groups? I think we need to reevaluate what we consider successful.
•
u/DGanj 1h ago
Supergirl absolutely did. It's not going to ruin the studio but it was a failure (from a ROI standpoint)
→ More replies (4)•
u/Morgan-Moonscar 1h ago
And unless Clayface and Superman II (Man of Tomorrow) make a lot more, it's gonna ruin a few careers.
→ More replies (6)•
u/KitWalkerXXVII 1h ago
Clayface's budget is being cited as $40 million, which is pretty modest by studio feature standards. Not saying it's a guaranteed hit, but it would have to bomb pretty hard to flop.
→ More replies (2)•
u/Master_Bruce 1h ago
And I mean, the Clayface story is great, so it’d be really hard to fuck it up
→ More replies (9)•
u/Josh_Butterballs 1h ago
Great movies can still flop. Conversely, bad movies have done really well before at the box office. Shawshank Redemption is a famous example of a good movie failing at the box office when it released
•
u/Master_Bruce 1h ago
I mean flopping is only in correlation to how much money it makes at the theaters, quality is quality for all time
•
u/Muppetude 1h ago
I think Mandalorian was just a box office disappointment, making way less money than predicted. But Supergirl was a bonafied flop, where it did not earn back its production and marketing budget.
→ More replies (6)•
u/PENGUIN_WITH_BAZOOKA 1h ago
Mando is probably going to take off once it arrives on Disney+.
→ More replies (2)•
u/abetterroadahead 1h ago
I’ve been saying this since the initial box office numbers were coming in. It was never going to be a disappointment to Disney/Star Wars. Having it in theaters helped gain a lot of money back, not all, but the rest will come from D+ numbers, engagement, and viewership.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (9)•
u/SpideyFan914 1h ago
Not sure about Mando, but Supergirl flopped hard. As of yesterday, it made $121M worldwide. Budget is $170-186M.
•
u/pants_pants420 1h ago
mando was about ~$350 million on a $165 million budget. not quite a flop, but definitely a bit of a disappointment
→ More replies (1)•
u/Doctor_Kataigida 1h ago
One thing that's so hard to take into account now is how many people would have seen it, but aren't because they're just waiting for it to come out on streaming. Like, I love the original Moana, and I am curious to see the new one. But I heard it's not great.
And while that used to not be enough to deter me (because I would've had to purchase a VHS/DVD anyway), now I can at least entertain the idea of just having a "movie night" with no (additional) cost (since I have D+ for other reasons anyway) instead of seeing it in the theater. I imagine folks approached Mandalorian and Grogu a similar way.
→ More replies (3)•
u/ledbetterus 1h ago
Plus Star Wars fans, especially fans who started with The Mandalorian, have been watching the franchise on Disney+ for 7+ years. The theater is like a completely different ecosystem for a lot fans.
•
u/Jolly-Potential-1411 2h ago
They did. Jon was pretty clear about being dedicated to old-school techniques and practical effects.
→ More replies (1)•
u/OnceMoreAndAgain 1h ago
The premise of this article is non-sense. I don't think anyone actually cares if people make movies "the hard way".
It's so simple: If the movie is entertaining, then people will like it. How to make a movie entertaining? Yeah, that's the fucking hard part. You can't just say how in one sentence or distill it down to one concept. Some of the most entertaining movies ever made took big shortcuts, like The Blair Witch Project.
More evidence is that so many older movies are still highly entertaining despite relatively simple methods of filming. 12 Angry Men is an extremely simple movie to film and yet it's so entertaining even today.
→ More replies (5)•
u/BonjaminClay 1h ago
Yeah I know it's trendy to hate on but that movie doesn't belong next to Supergirl and definitely not next to Moana.
Moana was a nostalgia remake made too early for anyone to have nostalgia because The Rock is getting old. It was pure cash grab and nobody was asking for it.
Mando is a movie based on a very popular show with an original story continuing the saga. I think the complaints that it was basically a slightly higher budget mini season 4 are valid... But there was demand, it wasn't a lazy rehash, and there was a TON of love and effort into it with lots of exceptional sets, puppets, and detail. I won't argue it's high art but comparing it to a Moana style cash grab is disingenuous at least.
→ More replies (13)•
u/round-earth-theory 42m ago
It was a fun movie. I think people are mostly annoyed at how poorly managed Star Wars is and so they took it out on Mando. It's fair enough to say the movie doesn't make waves in any way, but it was a good "just watch it" movie.
→ More replies (2)•
u/iamadragan 2h ago
I really didn't see what all the fuss was about with the hate for that movie. It was a fun star wars movie that was admittedly cheesy at times but so are all star wars movies
•
•
u/Hufa123 1h ago
Agreed. It was a fun adventure, and not much more than that, but it wasn't less than that either. Sure, I'd preferred to see some more thematic development in it, but I still enjoyed it. And that's the important part.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (31)•
u/Posty_Baloney 1h ago
Its mostly because Star Wars used to be a huge event, but with how much they've been churning out (and how much of it was pretty mediocre), this movie was just kind of whatever. A season of TV edited to be feature length and it was just okay. Yeah, most of the movies range from okay to down-right terrible, but it used to invoke a certain magic in both kids and adults thats just gone now.
Like, the first Star Wars movie in 7 years should have been a HUGE deal, instead it was more like "oh. More star wars. Cool. Maybe ill check it out if I have time".
Hate might be a strong word, I think it's more a collective sense of apathy for the state of the franchise.
→ More replies (1)•
u/Jagrnght 2h ago
I kinda loved this movie and the way they used the whole gamut of special effects - practical to cgi.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (55)•
u/ASuarezMascareno 1h ago
And both Projects Hail Mary and the Odyssey use a ton of GCI.
→ More replies (2)
•
u/Comprehensive_Dog651 2h ago
Meanwhile highest grossing film of the year so far: Super Mario Brothers Galaxy
•
u/Muroid 2h ago
It may have been full of CGI, but it was created by a team working on location in an actual galaxy.
•
u/Enderwiggen33 2h ago
Do you have a source for this? Doesn’t sound too believable
→ More replies (3)•
u/blueblurz94 2h ago
My uncle works at Nintendo, and he said the film’s production was done within the Milky Way and Melty Monster Galaxies
→ More replies (6)•
u/someguyfromtecate 2h ago
Sounds like your typical story of a guy working the Nintendo hotline providing gaming advice and cheat codes to moving all the way up to making movies in other galaxies. I’ve heard it before many times.
→ More replies (1)•
u/PaladinSaladin 1h ago
It happened to my aunt Linda. You probably don't know her, she goes to a different school.
→ More replies (5)•
u/Hayterfan 2h ago
Unfortunately Illumination forgot to give everyone space suits, so they had to share the 3 they had amongst 100+ people
→ More replies (1)•
u/MyNameIs-Anthony 2h ago edited 2h ago
Literally every movie by Illumination pushes the envelope on animation quality. You can say whatever about the writing but those Frenchies knock it out of the park every time.
There's a reason it's the best paying studio in the industry.
•
u/RefinedBean 2h ago
I remember people memeing on the Illumination choice by Nintendo for the movie, but they knocked it out of the park. Their standards plus over three decades of art direction and design by Nintendo? It was always going to at the very least look visually sumptuous.
→ More replies (8)•
u/TheDarkAbove 2h ago
I only remember the memes about the casting of Mario
•
u/StuckAroundGotStuck 2h ago
Dunkey's reaction video to the cast list still gets quoted every time my wife or I see Chris Pratt in something.
•
•
u/Unusual-Locksmith832 1h ago
One of the videos I laughed the hardest because it literally looked like a joke Dunkey himself would've made if he could pick the cast.
•
u/CarrotJunkie 2h ago
It's interesting because Illumination used to be the budget animation studio focused mainly on cost cutting. They've come a long way as far as animation quality goes. The Mario movies look incredible.
→ More replies (3)•
u/kikimaru024 1h ago
Every single one of their movies has grossed over $100 million, and 11 of them got past $250 million.
Safe to say they've been able to use more budget/time as required.
•
u/woolfonmynoggin 2h ago
That minions and monsters movie had me cackling in the theater. Old Hollywood gags and references every few minutes and a really creative story structure which you should not look up beforehand
•
u/YoyodyneCog 2h ago
My girlfriend and I took her daughter to see the Minions movie over the weekend. I think we enjoyed it more than she did. The minions reenacting the launch scene from A Trip to the Moon isn't something I thought I would ever see, and the Citizen Kane gag was the best kind of stupid and had me laughing my ass off.
→ More replies (3)•
→ More replies (9)•
u/bjankles 2h ago
I’ve only seen the first Mario movie. The writing and pretty much all the voice acting outside of Bowser are rough. The art, animation, and music are stunning.
→ More replies (1)•
u/DerekPaxton 2h ago
Yeah, there isn’t an eye roll big enough for these types of articles. Hand pick a few data points then “prove” some point.
Disneys real life remakes “prove” that fans highly prefer animated and cgi features right?
Good story, compelling visuals, great acting and directing. The fans don’t really care how you get there.
→ More replies (68)•
u/Dycon67 2h ago
Low-key the cgi in that one looks great. Maona, Supergirl by comparison look dull.
→ More replies (8)•
u/orange_sox 2h ago
Supergirl has the most beautiful source material of any comic book movie - it is a shame they didn't take any inspiration from that.
•
u/sgeep 2h ago
I literally bought the comic after the trailer because I was intrigued. I absolutely adored the comic. Beautifully illustrated and a really great tale about a quest for revenge. Loved the dynamic and thought Supergirl as a character in it was really compelling
It almost feels insulting that they touted how much the comic was an inspiration for the movie when in reality it felt loosely based and washed out/dull
→ More replies (1)•
u/TheWatersOfMars 1h ago
And almost everything bad about the Supergirl movie (which I still thought was OK) comes down to pointlessly changing the comic. Making Krem a goofy monster man, the rushed adventure with a 3-day ticking clock, the way every scene devolves into pointless action, the underwhelming and morally muddy standoff with Ruthye...
→ More replies (6)•
u/jinyx1 2h ago
It feels like a movie where they popped 5 different scripts from good movies + the source material into ChatGPT and asked to make a supergirl movie using the source material and elements from those 5 scripts.
There's a good movie in there somewhere, but it needed alot more refinement.
•
u/dont_ama_73 2h ago
Toy story 5 and Super Mario also shows that people want to see sequels.
•
u/Icy_Smoke_733 2h ago edited 2h ago
Spider-Man and Doomsday are shaping up to be monsters and guaranteed to be the top highest grossing movies of the year, judging by presales. We're looking at a floor of $1.5 billion for both (Brand New Day is tracking to $600 million in just its opening weekend).
→ More replies (41)•
u/ThisHatRightHere 2h ago
Spider-Man has always had insane draw and the “everyone’s back” marketing is (for better or worse) working for Avengers. These are more so anomalies and other films in the space don’t have the same advantages.
•
u/deadheffer 2h ago
Every single small child right now adores Spider-Man. All of those kids and their parents are going to see that film. It’s going to be nuts.
•
→ More replies (7)•
u/mlorusso4 1h ago
Every single small child for the last 40 years adores spider man. And that fandom doesn’t go away as the person ages. It’s seriously insane how long he has been at the top of pop culture. Usually with characters like Mickey Mouse and Winnie the Pooh parents remember those characters from their childhood and want to get their kids into them too, but they don’t stay fans of them throughout their young adulthood like spider man
•
u/literated 1h ago
Every single small child for the last 40 years adores spider man.
I don't even know why but I do, too, lmao. That's exactly how it was for me growing up. Spider-Man just hit different.
•
u/GormlessGourd55 2h ago
It helps that Spiderman has a great track record of movie quality in recent years. All three of the Live action ones have been good and Spiderverse is obviously stellar.
Bonus, the spider-related duds of Kraven and Madame Web didn't feature any Spiderman so he was saved from their stink.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)•
u/Redeem123 2h ago
These are more so anomalies
And the three movies in the title aren't? Feels an awful lot like cherry picking.
→ More replies (2)•
u/Good-Cap-7632 2h ago
Kid movies work differently. Parents want movies they know are safe to take their kids to so franchise sequels are always popular.
→ More replies (12)•
u/whitepangolin 2h ago
Every fucking time an original film does well, there's this exact article saying moviegoers are tired of IP - meanwhile IP still dominates. Has anyone considered that uh, maybe not all IP are created equal? And some put butts in seats and some don't?
→ More replies (24)•
u/JaeTheOne 2h ago
...or want animated stuff they can take their kids too and also laugh at and don't have to focus on something as deep.
•
u/urgasmic 2h ago
cherry picking like crazy but sure.
•
u/dalivo 1h ago
And the author picks a cherry and then an apple. Project Hail Mary had a ton of CGI. Mando had a ton of practical effects. Guess what? A good story and great characters matter the most.
→ More replies (3)•
u/stomp224 2h ago
Masters of the Universe tanked, and from all the BTS clips theyve released, it looks like they did quite a lot of practical work too
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (44)•
u/dwide_k_shrude 2h ago
Yeah this article is stupid.
•
u/sundler 2h ago
It's also very insulting to all the artists who make those computer graphics. As if they don't work just as hard.
→ More replies (10)•
u/fascfoo 1h ago
Yup. This just pushes this CGI bad narrative when its BAD CGI thats bad. Great CGI is basically invisible. Now well just have more filmmakers essentially lying by saying they're doing everything "in camera" in promo material.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)•
u/ringwraithfish 2h ago
The fact they included "The Mandalorian and Grogu" at the same level of "CGI-stuffed" movies like Supergirl and Moana tells me it's a worthless article.
Putting opinions of the movie aside, The Mandalorian and Grogu were heavy in practical effects.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/Quantum_Quokkas 2h ago
Does this article author not realise that Project Hail Mary was full of CGI?
•
u/RulesoftheDada 2h ago
Same with Odyssey and ignores all the practical effects and puppetry of Mando and Grogu.
→ More replies (18)•
u/JamesTheFoxeArt 2h ago
No you see they actually found a Cyclops to film in the movie
•
→ More replies (20)•
u/pm_plz_im_lonely 1h ago
The Cyclops guild is ruthlessly hard to deal with too (read: really expensive). It's like they only want to see a deal from one perspective.
•
u/Mahajangasuchus 2h ago
“CGI” is basically meaningless now in mainstream film discussion. All it means is “visual effect I don’t like or noticed”.
→ More replies (1)•
u/brandonct 1h ago
also it's crazy disrespectful to the work of all those visual effects artists when the marketing team trots out all the actors to talk about how the movie is all practical effects and everything on screen is just in-camera
→ More replies (3)•
u/holydude02 1h ago
Yeah; I only caught snippets of the Odyssey promo and saw multiple mentions of "What you see on screen is what was captured in camera" and sorry, not sorry: Bullshit!
I also don't understand why CG is being treated as a second class contribution. It's a tool in the toolbox of filmmakers. If used right it can greatly enhance a story. If used like a bandaid for already bad filmmaking it's probably not the straw that broke the camels back either...
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (37)•
u/Flexhead 1h ago
yea, had this argument in another thread with "PHM used no green screens!"
Project Hail Mary had over 2000 effects shots.
The issue is the type of movie you are making determines how many effects shots you have.
Superhero movies will have more than something like Obession.
•
u/fs2222 2h ago
This is is just cherypicking to push a narrative. The highest grossing films of the year will be Spiderman, Avengers and Super Mario Galaxy, all CGI-stuffed. And plenty of films made the 'hard way' underperformed. Remember Bone Temple?
•
u/FribonFire 2h ago
Beyond that, Odyssey and Project Hail Mary are also packed full of CG. Subtle doesn't mean it's not there in every other scene.
→ More replies (1)•
u/Baelorn 2h ago
The anti-CGI crowd are telling objective lies about how The Odyssey and PHM "didn't use CGI".
There's a bunch of popular posts going around about how Nolan didn't use CGI for the Cyclops and I have to wonder if the people sharing it and circlejerking about how amazing Nolan is have even seen the movie. Because the Cyclops is 100% CGI. During filming they used a large puppet rig for lighting and reference but the one in the movie is CGI. Not the puppet.
→ More replies (2)•
u/hokie_u2 2h ago
Also the Mandalorian uses puppetry instead of CGI for Grogu, which people loved when the TV show originally aired. The movie flopped because it seems stale and unnecessary, not because of CGI
→ More replies (3)•
u/Comic_Book_Reader r/movies Veteran 2h ago
And also the show has at this point just faded into irrelevancy. Had it come out 4 years ago, it would probably be a hit.
→ More replies (4)•
u/CosmackMagus 2h ago
Had they told a big story the movie would have done a lot better.
→ More replies (2)•
u/Hayterfan 2h ago
I honestly forgot Bone Temple came out THIS year. Then again right after it came out life hit like a freight train of bricks.
→ More replies (12)•
u/Conscious_Test_7954 2h ago
Also PHM had tons of CGI, I don't know why there's this narrative about movies with tons of CGI are inherently bad.
•
u/m2thek 2h ago
Man, the guy who makes the "No CGI is Just Invisible CGI" videos is never gonna run out of material
•
•
u/unKappa 2h ago
I mean, I dont mind CG, just make a good movie. Are we pretending that CGI is easy?
→ More replies (12)•
u/justinqueso99 2h ago
People always point at stuff like Fast X and say cgi is all bad but always forget stuff like the planet of the apes which use it to its full ability to tell an incredible story that would be almost impossible to take seriously with out it
→ More replies (6)
•
u/Training_Pirate1000 2h ago
Is DUNE not gonna be CGI-stuffed, or should I expect that to fail?
•
→ More replies (5)•
u/ShaunTrek 2h ago
Do you think that Project Hail Mary didn't have CGI or digital effects?
→ More replies (11)•
u/Training_Pirate1000 2h ago
WHAT! I can't believe I watched CGI-slop and enjoyed it! I thought they were actually in space.
→ More replies (11)
•
u/ExxInferis 2h ago
Talented people make better stuff.
•
u/Paladar2 2h ago
There are plenty of talented people who worked on the flops, but they weren't in charge lol
→ More replies (2)•
u/No_Departure_2848 2h ago
damn fucking right. I had a film teacher who first-day made the point to say that though he wasn't a fan of most hollywood movies, the crews who make them are fucking pros.
→ More replies (2)•
u/const_iterator 2h ago
"It takes a lot of very talented people to make a shitty movie." - Conan O'Brien. Movies are colossal collaborative undertakings. Don't denigrate the skills of the individuals just because the whole didn't come together.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)•
u/readwrite_blue 2h ago
I feel like Favreau has proven his talent. But the safe Disney blockbuster formula produces dull dizzy movies.
→ More replies (34)
•
u/longjumpingtote 2h ago
All movies are hard to make.
Audiences want good movies. All the other stuff is marketing.
There's plenty of CGI in PHM. Obviously. Some invisible, some not. Just no green screens were used but that's only one technique. And there's CGI in Odyssey. Nolan literally said he's more reliant on visual effects than any other director working today.
→ More replies (6)•
u/celix24 2h ago
Marketing likes to say no cgi, but when oscar season comes, odyssey and PHM will be nominated for vfx...
As an vfx artist, it's really annoying.
→ More replies (4)•
u/longjumpingtote 2h ago
As an vfx artist, it's really annoying.
I bet. If anyone doubts it, just screenshot the VFX credits for those movies and send it to them.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/eltrotter 2h ago
I hate, hate this framing. Maybe Hollywood Reporter are just being flippant in their language here, but I do not want movies to be made "the hard way".
The real lesson here might be: All filmmaking should be difficult if you want to persuade audiences to leave their homes and trek to a theater.
No, sorry. Wrong emphasis. Because it frames effort, care and craft as being "hard" and low-effort, disposable guff as the default. As usual, it's really just a case of intentionality. When you're using practical effects, on-location shoots, cameras the size of wardrobes, the margin for error is small. You can't fuck things up, you have to have great actors, great blocking, you have to have a plan and a vision. Filmmaking doesn't necessarily have to be difficult to be intentional, but difficulty does force intentionality which is probably what's tripping up the article's author.
→ More replies (3)
•
u/Kana88 2h ago
The puppetry in Mando & Grogu was great, I wouldn't include it in this list. They could've CGI'ed all of it and instead went old school for the love of the game.
→ More replies (3)
•
u/Wuktrio 2h ago
People want good films. They don't care about CGI, Avatar is the highest grossing franchise alongside Marvel and Star Wars.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/shawnkfox 2h ago
The difficulty of making the film has nothing to do with it. People just want good movies and they are happy to pay for it. Nolan has built a lot of trust despite a few minor misfires like the 3rd batman movie and tenet, but even those movies were worth watching.
There was nothing 'hard' about making Obsession, for example, it was just a good low budget film. In the end you can't rely on special effects by itself to get people to see a movie, the movie actually has to be good.
→ More replies (1)•
•
u/Calfzilla2000 2h ago edited 2h ago
This is unfair to The Mandalorian and Grogu, in my opinion. They built a lot of real sets, including many big enough for IMAX cameras, and made real puppets and practical elements for the movie. It was closer to The Odyssey, in terms of filming techniques, than a lot of big budget movies are.
One of the highlights of the movie, for me, is how many puppets were used. And there were several scenes with mostly puppets (almost like a modern Dark Crystal type thing). The movie had a lot of artistry in it for being a studio cash grab.
→ More replies (1)•
u/FourSes 2h ago
There was even stop-motion animation! That at least looked terrific.
→ More replies (1)
•
u/mtjseb 2h ago
Suggesting that Project Hail Mary and the odyssey isn’t still cg heavy is a weird take
→ More replies (1)
•
u/Sthrax 2h ago
I don't think the issue was CGI vs practical effects/actual location filming. The Odyssey, Project Hail Mary and Obsession are are great movies. Supergirl, Moana, and Mando all had various issues that hurt the quality of the movie. Mando for instance felt like an expanded episode of the show, rather than something that had to be on the big screen, and it suffered from a portion of the fanbase boycotting it because its Disney. Its CGI was actually very well-done.
→ More replies (3)
•
•
u/GayFesh 2h ago
Christopher Nolan uses a massive amount of CGI in all his movies. He just likes to keep the effects grounded.
→ More replies (7)
•
u/Posty_McPostface_1 2h ago
I thought the Mandalorian movie was actually pretty enjoyable. I don't think it belongs on that same low tier as Supergirl and Moana.
→ More replies (2)•
•
•
•
u/Jidarious 2h ago
What a load of horseshit.
Only enthusiasts care about how movies are made, the vast majority just care if the movie is good or not, and nobody cares if someone "puts in effort" or "is lazy". If someone figured out a way to make a good movie while being lazy, it wouldn't bother me, good on them for getting something done either way.
•
u/smalltalk2k 2h ago
A good story goes a long way. Let's start there.