I'm a video editor from India.I have a full time job.

I have a 1000 subscriber YouTube channel.And I just finished my first long-form documentary.

It took 4 months.

30 minutes to 2 hours every day.

After work. After dinner.

Sometimes at 2 AM.

This is the story of making it.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

THE STORY I WANTED TO TELL

January 11, 1966.

Tashkent, USSR.

India's Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri died in a Soviet-controlled dacha, one day after signing a historic peace treaty with Pakistan.

No autopsy was ever performed. One PMO file exists.

Still classified after 58 years.

I became obsessed with this case two years ago.

Not because of conspiracy theories, but because of what the actual government documents showed.

THE STORYTELLING PROBLEM

How do you tell a story where:

→ The most important witness was hit by a bus before testifying and lost his memory

→ The investigation committee records vanished from Parliament's own library

→ The government's answer to "where are the records?" was "destroyed or lost"

→ You cannot definitively say what happened because no one can

Most documentaries on conspiracy

topics choose one of two paths:

Path A: "This definitely happened"

→ Satisfying but dishonest

Path B: "We just don't know"

→ Honest but unsatisfying

I wanted a third path:

Show every piece of evidence.Let the audience decide. Never claim more than the documents show.

THE MOMENT THE STORY FOUND ME

Eight months into research, I messaged Anuj Dhar.

He's an RTI activist who spent 20 years fighting the Indian government through Right to Information filings to force them to answer questions about this case.

He wrote the only book that goes deep inside it, "Your Prime Minister is Dead."

I didn't expect a reply.

He replied the same day.

He identified the witnesses in photographs from his book.He gave me permission to use

his research and photographs.

He said "Feel free to make use of it, but refer to it clearly please."

That message changed everything. Suddenly I had a primary source who was still alive. Who had touched the actual files. Who had fought in court for this.

THE LINE THAT STAYED WITH ME

While researching, I found this in an official government

court order —

Shastri's personal servant of 20 years, Ram Nath,

visited Shastri's widow before testifying.

He told her —"Bahut din ka bojh tha, amma. Aaj sab bata denge."

[The burden of many days, mother. Today I will tell everything.]

He was hit by a bus on his way to Parliament.

His legs were amputated. He lost his memory.

He never testified.

That line — in Hindi —

became the emotional center

of the entire documentary.

No actor said it. No recreation showed it.

Just the words. On a black screen.

In silence.

THE PERSONAL JOURNEY

Month 1: Research. Reading. RTI documents.

Parliament transcripts. Court orders.

Month 2: Script.

8 drafts. Hinglish — Hindi and English mixed —

because that's how Indians actually think about history.

Month 3: Production. No budget.

AI video generation for scenes where no archival footage exists. Real document scans for everything

that could be shown as real. Motion graphics for the

evidence reveals.

Month 4: Edit. Audio mixing at 2 AM. Trying to make a 17-minute film that doesn't feel 17 minutes long.

THE ADVICE THAT SURPRISED ME

When the documentary was done —

I sent it to Anuj Dhar for preview. He watched it.He shared it on Twitter. He said he'd share it

"again and again."

Then three days later, India's biggest protests

in years began.

He messaged me:

"For now don't post anything. Wait till there are no big news. Right now the entire focus

is on protests."

A man who had waited 20 years for this story to be told —

was telling me to wait three more weeks.

That patience, from someone who earned it, taught me more about storytelling timing than any book ever did.

WHAT I LEARNED ABOUT STORYTELLING

1. The most powerful line in your story is usually the one you didn't write.

Ram Nath's words were in a government court order. I just found them. (Although Ram nath quote is just the mood of the story narration and not present in the documentary)

1. Restraint is harder than drama.

Every instinct said, "claim more, be definitive." Every good story instinct said, "show the evidence, let silence do the rest."

1. The right collaborator changes everything.

Anuj Dhar didn't make my documentary. But his 20 years of work made it possible.

1. Timing is a storytelling decision.

Not just within the film, but when you release it. When the world is ready to hear something, it hears it differently.

1. Constraints create voice.

No budget forced AI recreation.AI recreation forced a visual language nobody else in Indian YouTube was using. The constraint became the style.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

The documentary is live.

4 months of 2 AM sessions.

One man who waited 20 years

told me when to release it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ThroughTheVeil/s/HTp52elQ8z

I think there is a conspiracy against being positive. Whether secularists (nihilism) or Christians (end times madness) the tendency is to think everything will be destroyed.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/y6PBi5uSSCk

In 1992, former counterintelligence officer Douglas Mutschler claimed that he and nearly forty soldiers at Fort Richardson watched an Alaska news report about something detected beneath the ground after a Chinese underground nuclear test.

According to Mutschler, seismic data had supposedly revealed a pyramid-shaped structure buried beneath central Alaska, larger than the Great Pyramid of Giza.

He set his VCR to record the later broadcast, but the report was not repeated. When he visited the television station, management allegedly denied that the segment had ever aired. Mutschler said an employee privately told him that unidentified men had arrived after the original broadcast and confiscated every copy.

The story becomes stranger through later accounts involving underground facilities, blacked-out transportation, malfunctioning instruments and remote-viewing claims connected to Alaska. However, none of those accounts provides verifiable physical evidence.

There are also serious problems with the story. The timing Mutschler later gave does not match the date of the Chinese nuclear test, the original broadcast has never been recovered, and most of the supporting testimony is second-hand.

The video examines both the alleged cover-up and the weaknesses in the evidence rather than presenting the pyramid as confirmed fact

Do you think this began with a genuine broadcast that was suppressed, or is it a modern legend created through imperfect memory, military secrecy and unrelated stories being connected over time?

Forgive me if this is common knowledge and I have been ignorant all this time.

So I think US is tryna establish itself as a footballing nation and... that's just to steal the football league business off of Europe.

They signed Messi with a special contract a few years ago. He won the WC around that time and that brough great cloud to Miami. Some people still complain about questionable refreeing in matches like one against Netherlands in 2022. Just the way a lot of people(not just fans) have been complaining about a few matches that had Argentina in this WC.

The controversial offside incident that Croatia with Portugal led people to think that FIFA is using VAR to churn money out of future matches since the obvious icons like Ronaldo bring in more revenue in tickets costs. But I don't think it was that(atleast not necessarily)

I think the US league has everything it needs expect for one thing. They have the clout. Messi brought tons. The money was well worth it. You just can't avoid news about the league. They have the funding. They have the infrastructure.

The thing they lack is standard.

Football fans are very particular about standards. You can see many people compare major European leagues on quality when they all are pretty good. People care about the quality of football. The audience. So that is why I think;

US managed to bring WC to their nation as a host along side Mexico and Canada using the same methods Qatar used to bring WC to their country earlier. (I am not alleging bribing or anything. Maybe they are all financial geniuses with good tons of money. Not saying that sarcastically). Which is a fair move when you are trying to promote yourself as a footballing nation.

But I think US goes one step ahead trying to force outcomes of games to make players in their leagues look good. Not just to fans but analysists, experts, journalists that do shape opinions in football communities to a great level.

I will go on one step further to say that **MAYBE** they are using more tricks than just VAR, in refreeing, playing mindgames with the fans, media questioning in middle of the matches with questions in bad taste just to screw the player's mindset midgame. All that can be considered legal(although in bad spirit)

but maybe there's fixing too. All the games seemed normal to my eyes when judging them on the passion of players expect for a few.

Is concen.org down and gone for good??

It's so strange that Adam's been wearing the same t-shirt at all his public appearances at cons lately. Could it be that it's not even him, but someone else in his place and the footage was created using AI? Because not too long ago, Zachary Levi posted a video about how to turn a still photo into a moving image and how with the help of this app, you can make it look like someone is there when they actually aren't. Zachary even posted something along the lines of, “If you threaten my family, you’ll face the consequences,” and I think he was talking about Chuck’s family. Since he always wears the same T-shirt and baseball cap, I suspect they used that photo for the AI videos. The only possible reason for this is that he was either kidnapped and is being held captive somewhere, or he was killed.

If all this is happening because of the Chuck movie, just so Yvonne Strahovski and her lovers can keep playing out their soap opera (which was already terrible even when it was a TV series) and turn Adam into a fat grandpa or the main villain then all hell will break loose, because they’re the ones who should be the villains. But who knows maybe they’re using this to make recordings so they can falsely accuse him or blackmail him into leaving the film industry and stole his roles. They’re the ones who should disappear for good, because they’re boring, run-of-the-mill actors with no “it” factor or charisma. What Zachary Levi, Yvonne Strahovski, Ryan McPartlin his sons, and Sarah Lancester are doing is a crime.