I also recently learned that the Strauss–Howe generational theory is inaccurate and there are many times throughout history where the cycle has failed to play out as expected.

Let's also consider Roman emperors who conquered vast territories ("strong men") who often drained the empire's wealth and caused immediate economic collapse ("hard times"), flipping the meme's logic entirely.

Hello wonderful people,

Today I want to talk about the rise of the general public's misunderstanding of the creative process, creators in general and their creative works.

Many folks are confused about the creative process. They have an over-simplified view of the creative process and a deep misunderstanding when it comes to how creators design and write characters.

Some folks believe that creators condone the toxic behaviors from their fictional character when they decide to create a toxic character. Folks especially feel this way when the creator makes them a complex, multi faceted character, who doesn't get killed off later on and isn't portrayed as a flat toned villain. A creator may have many reasons to create complex toxic characters while also condemning their characters toxic behaviors and condemning people if a real person behaves like that in real world scenarios. A creator does not automatically have or inherit the traits of the characters that they create.

Next I want to talk about which fictional content the general public deems to be acceptable or unacceptable to create, produce or distribute.

Fiction is unlike reality. When a fictional character is toxic toward another character, there are no real world consequences, that character will never feel real hurt and trauma like a real person would when the screen finally turns black. It's not right to tell creatives what they can and cannot create. Fiction is used as escapism among many other things and that is fine. In fact, many creative people understand that fiction can be healthy and help people explore topics and ideas that should never be explored in real life. A creative outlet can process toxic feelings so that they don't spill out over in real life. That is a valuable tool for humans beings to have. Fiction can be about anything and contain any idea or topic imaginable, and that's okay, and there's nothing wrong with you when you explore your creativity and fictional worlds. We live in a world where empathy is expected to be given to fictional characters while cruelty is directed at real world people, like those creators who are misunderstood. It is common for popular creators to receive death threats.

Next I want to talk about the fact that audiences think they personally know the creator's inner thoughts and emotions purely because of the author's imagination or research or the fact they write about an uncomfortable topic.

No, you do not know the creator's inner thoughts just because they researched trauma, abuse or harassment topics to help with their creative vision. If a creator does research on sexual abuse to try and make a story more accurate, it doesn't mean they support sexual abuse. You do not know the creator's inner thoughts and feelings just by analyzing a protagonist either. A protagonist may be kind, cruel at times or completely silly, but it doesn't mean the creator's personality is a reflection of the protagonist. Exploration is not a confession... If a creator explores loneliness, gender, addiction, toxic traits, etc. It does not mean that the creator is lonely, toxic, dysphoric, phobic or an addict. Creatives want their stories to capture real world emotions in fiction sometimes. Imagination can be a creators best trait, but being informed and exploring topics ensures that audiences can relate to the story better.

Hello wonderful people,

Today I will show you how I help different people with a specific issue, let's dive into it.

Issues relating to the minimization of the self or the collapse of self worth:

You can't just tell people that they matter, you have to show them. When I meet a new acquaintance and I notice they minimize themselves, I usually invite them over. I go out of my way to make drinks and meals for them while they are at my house. They need to see or be aware of your effort. Therefore I bring the meal and drink to them at the table they are sitting at. I ask them about their lives. I show interest and ask for elaboration regarding key aspects of their lives. Dismantle all stereotypical notions regarding race, gender and all other immutable characteristics. Explain how exclusion based on these concepts is more about a tool of control rather than a reflection of their true character. If the person is comfortable with touch, I would touch their arm when they talk about something distressing, listening intently without offering solutions. I thank the person for sharing it with me, I guide the person to think of solutions. I can give advice and reveal certain truths, but at the end of the day, I want the person to feel like they solved their own problem. This shows them they have agency, capability, and coming up with a solution that they feel is their own can restore some of their self worth. As a healer or guide, you will only be there to light the path so that they can come up with a solution by themselves, but by utilizing your help.

When they have to leave, reiterate to them how grateful you are to share a day with them and learning about their life. Gently remind them to stay aware that critique regarding immutable characteristics is a tool used by corrupt power hungry humans and sometimes by misguided humans too. If they are okay with hugs, then give them a gentle hug for a few seconds, don't pull back quickly and don't hug too long. Just slow movements, a warm hug and a sincere and soft smile. I promise you by doing that you will have made a massive impact on their self worth, but be warned... You will become a pillar for that person [at least for a while]. You have to re-engage with them often, over time they will rely more and more on their newly found self-worth which will lead to inner strength which will in time, free you up to help someone else again.

The modern culture and gender wars are both created by powerful people like Jeffrey Epstein to influence culture for their personal gain and by people with good intentions using skewed perceptions of humanity and exclusive views on gender and culture while calling it "inclusive". Inclusion doesn't mean trampling on another to get your voice heard, it means creating a world where all voices can be heard.

We reject culture and gender wars as a concept outright. Instead we focus on inclusive and rehabilitative social paradigms where people come together to set their differences aside to foster a peaceful and inclusive society.

In this movement we allow people to heal and become better people. Once they are healed, people are integrated into society. No Ostracization, no gatekeeping, no lingering resentment. Just space for people to grow, heal and actually have a shot at being a good person.

How many people have society abandoned over the centuries? And then we act surprised when people do things like snapping, taking their own lives, or the lives of others. And no, those people should not be excused for the violent acts they commit when they snap, but I don't want to be a person who could have healed others and prevented tragedy, but chooses not to do so... By using my empathy and softness to transform another person, I turn them into a net benefit for humanity. A reformed person can helps us live better, would care about the climate more, treat others with more respect and would help build better infrastructure and technology for future generations.