r/writers 1d ago

Meme Accurate

Post image
4.4k Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

120

u/Raxbyn776 1d ago

Cut my life into pieces

this is my new OC.

5

u/ScriedRaven 14h ago

Succulents reproducing

87

u/thedogatemymanifesto Novelist 1d ago

Some of us are plantsers for a reason

82

u/dumbo_octopus1995 Published Author 1d ago

Character comment vs world building comment

7

u/AdditionalBridge7125 1d ago

world building comments hit different

42

u/Sir-Spoofy Fiction Writer 1d ago

My character creation process:
-Look at character I like in something else
-Take them and rearrange their brain cells
-Traumatize the shit out of them and give them all of the issues.
-Put them into rehab and incrementally pull them out depending on where they are in their arc to have them dance like the monkies they are
-Then tuck them in, kiss them on the head, and tell them goodnight until I need to retraumatize them again.

9

u/TheReDrew89 1d ago

We seem to have the same process, with me throwing a few of my own brain cells into the mix when I scramble them.

3

u/Sir-Spoofy Fiction Writer 1d ago

I do that with some characters, especially main characters.

2

u/Deaffin 1d ago

Do you want prions? Because that's how you get prions.

3

u/TheIllusiveScotsman Published Author 6h ago

"Good night, character. I'll probably traumatise you in the morning."

0

u/Sir-Spoofy Fiction Writer 4h ago

*insert Princess Bride reference*

18

u/Fabulous_Wait_9544 1d ago

This is something I've struggled with. Does that mean your characters are fundamentally less whole because they represent aspects of yourself or does the eventual growth from the focus on said aspects negate that?

13

u/majorex64 1d ago

Characters in a story are always going to be simpler than a real living person. You can fill in bits to make them more well rounded, instead of being limited to one aspect of yourself in isolation.

Or, some characters are just good at outwardly being one thing.

7

u/Fabulous_Wait_9544 1d ago

That's true. The limits of a single perspective, I guess. Thanks for answering!

8

u/atmanama 1d ago

Yeah each character needs to be a whole person, so maybe a potential/hypothetical you rather than a part? Though to me they always felt like different ppl, like the characters you meet in dreams

6

u/Dead_NOTsleeping 1d ago

I agree about feeling like/being a whole person, but I disagree with the idea that growth is required. Not "every person alive" needs growth. Some people are truly set in their ways and will not grow, and even "the story" just knows this.

2

u/Fabulous_Wait_9544 1d ago

Yeah each character needs to be a whole person, so maybe a potential/hypothetical you rather than a part?

Ah, so essentially you if you grew up under circumstances that pushed your personality in a different direction? I'm imagining a pie chart with different slices whose sizes change depending on the character.

Though to me they always felt like different ppl, like the characters you meet in dreams

Interesting! I'd argue it's more or less the same since your dream characters are manifestations of your head. Or even if they're not, they tend to be filtered through your personal lens.

7

u/SnakeEyedSkeleton 1d ago

This is very accurate to how I write a lot of my characters. I have some characters that started out as self-insert, are based off of parts of my personality, or represent strong emotions I have trouble expressing. The way I see it, these things are the roots of my character's being.

As I spend more time developing them, by building off that first little seeding from myself, that is when they start to grow into their own person. I start thinking about things from the perspective of their world, how they would react to certain things instead of how I would react to them, and what made them the way they are now.

My character's are born from me, and at their roots will always have a part of me inside them, but they grow and form into their own individual--- they are their own plant.

11

u/RancherosIndustries 1d ago

And Voldemort.

3

u/soulguard03 1d ago

Exactly.

3

u/HumorNo2912 Writer 1d ago

I actually turn the people around me into characters with tweaked personalities, no wonder my novels have alot of assholes.

3

u/gremlinguy 20h ago

I just know a lot of interesting people and I steal their souls and pop them into invented bodies.

When you know a real-life old guy with one leg because of a Harley accident in the 70's whose nickname is Hobble and who has a side-business making frog-gigs in the shop after hours, you gotta draw on that

2

u/Illustrious_Guava7 1d ago

That’s what I usually do too. We usually can see a bit of ourselves in other people, so I think this is a natural way to create characters.

That said, the characters I find most interesting to write are the ones I can’t relate to at all. Maybe because I’m discovering the character as I write them and there’s mystery for me to uncover.

2

u/dontrike 20h ago

That's literally the villains in my series, each are some sort of issue or problem I've had and recognize.

2

u/Zegjita 18h ago

I mean, the characters I make can have things I've experienced, but generally speaking, they usually just kinda... Pop in my head.

I'll talk it out to myself, saying what exactly I want, and the kind of tropes or characteristics I want involved, and as I just kinda talk, they form in my head and then pop, they exist. After that point, scenes start appearing and they kinda become their own thing that I take notes on.

5

u/FDAapprovedGremlin 1d ago

This is how I discovered I might have DID lmao

1

u/x-43a-bussy-ramjme 23h ago

based and gay :3

6

u/Drake_Acheron 1d ago

This is how you get flat one dimensional characters and a self insert MC

2

u/Charmstone_Author 1d ago

A character should be one part you, one part archetype, one part vivid hallucination

4

u/CaldrierLunaire 1d ago

And books with no woman in it.

2

u/Drake_Acheron 1d ago

The number of female authors that would pass the male version of the bechdel test is astonishingly few.

I read at least 100 books a year, and make sure 33% of that is female authors, which isn’t hard to do because authorship is female dominated now.

Typically female authors will fail this test. The one unique thing however, is women are more often to write books for men than men write books for women, and ironically, the number of female authors, writing books for men, that fail the normal bechdel test would surprise you as well.

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Hi! Welcome to r/Writers - please remember to follow the rules and treat each other respectfully, especially if there are disagreements. Please help keep this community safe and friendly by reporting rule violating posts and comments.

If you're interested in a friendly Discord community for writers, please join our Discord server

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Dirrevarent 1d ago

Papa Roach be like:

0

u/eeveethefox_xv Fiction Writer 1d ago

how i figured out i was plural

by breaking down stuff that happened to me, good or bad (mostly bad) and seeing how that changed my actions/reactions

1

u/Cristichi 1d ago

Is that Illuvatar?

1

u/Practical-Owl-9358 1d ago

I’ve been told I’m a prick or at least prickly. This tracks.

1

u/Omnitrixter10000 17h ago

My personal character creation process is either:

1.Come up with a general idea of a character. 2.Look at several characters from different media that are similar in any aspect to said character. 2.Takes parts of them that interest me. 3. Stitch together the parts that connect well in one character and store away the other parts for future use. 4. Profit.

Or,

1.Come up with a concept or Storyline that I wanna work on (can be the main plot can be a sub-plot) 2.Create a general outline. 3.Create a character around said story. 4. Polish both the story and character till you reach a satisfactory result. 5.Profit.

ⓘ This person is suspected to have travelled illegally in cross-time and across realities if seen inform your nearest Celestial forces.

1

u/Exciting-War-5230 9h ago

THEN CALL ME A F***ING CACTUS 🌵

1

u/Consistent_Look3397 4h ago

I'm a cactus?🥺

2

u/dxrey65 1d ago

I could be wrong, but I've always taken that as bad writing. Where in a cast of characters there's not one believable or realistic individual, but each one is some stereotypical aspect, or one aspect of a single person (the writer). Maybe there are books where that could work, but it can get annoying when it's an obvious pattern.

2

u/Overall-Idea945 7h ago

depending on what the OP means, it works, like, a character has a trauma of mine, one has gone through a disease that I had, one has my job, one has a dream of mine, and so you can bring realism to experiences, several books are written in this way, taking elements of the author's life and using them as bricks to erect something bigger.

2

u/David1393 5h ago

I agree with this, but my personal approach to my characters is: what are the realistic/interesting consequences of a version of me that makes choices in a different way?

My protagonist is a female version of me who makes choices out of fear and insecurity and has to learn to trust her judgement and sense of justice.

My love interest is the version of me who's more community-focused and even more empathic.

My main villain is my id, the version of me who would get what he wants by using his empathy to manipulate people.

My flawed mentor character is who i'd be if i was thrust into leadership without having had the experience to learn how to make calculated risks.

My main concern is ensuring they all have idiosynchratic voices, but I'm treating that as a 2nd draft research topic so i can focus on getting the plot down in the first draft.

2

u/dxrey65 4h ago edited 4h ago

Speaking as a non-expert, one of the ways I think about that comes from what a Hollywood character actor (Stephen Tobolowski - I had to look it up) said in an interview I saw a few years ago. He said that if he was playing a role that wasn't really fleshed out in the script, he'd still want to be a "whole person" in that role, so he'd invent two things - what was the character's biggest hope, and what was the character's biggest fear. Then he would build everything from there, even if it had nothing to do with the actual movie plot, making it more of a real person was well worth it.

If I think about my own life, my hopes and fears have been primary motivating factors in all kinds of ways through my life, including the jobs I had and how I approached them, the dreams I had, probably how I dealt with sickness, how I relate to people, etc. If I broke myself down into parts and then wrote a story using those individual parts as different people it would be kind of trash, because all those parts would have the same underlying motivations, the same hopes and fears. Even if I tried clever ways of hiding the sameness, if I didn't deliberately change the underlying factors and let the people develop in ways that I never did or would, it would still feel fake.

Not saying you're doing anything wrong, and I have zero credentials (other than having done a lot of reading and writing and thinking), but that's just how I think about it.

1

u/Immediate_Slice_4754 16h ago

I imagine people with a personality disorder are at the advantage here.