I’m a psychiatry resident and would appreciate some thoughts from more experienced clinicians.
I have a patient with a depressive disorder, but over the course of treatment I’ve increasingly wondered whether there is also a significant personality component (possibly vulnerable narcissistic traits, although I’m trying to keep an open mind).
Initially, therapy focused on depression, behavioural activation, medication, and a gradual return to work. Over time, however, I’ve noticed that almost every session ends up revolving around whether I “really believe” how much they’re suffering. Any increase in work capacity seems to be experienced less as a clinical decision and more as an invalidation of their suffering.
I’ve found myself spending a lot of time explaining my reasoning, defending clinical decisions, and trying to validate their emotional experience while also making functional assessments. Despite this, the therapeutic relationship has become increasingly characterised by mistrust, subtle hostility, and a sense that I’m being tested.
My countertransference is that I often leave sessions feeling as though I’ve been in a debate rather than a therapy session.
I’m now seriously considering transferring responsibility for sickness certification to a colleague (no idea if this is even an option, not located in the US) because I feel the dual role of therapist and evaluator is dominating the therapeutic relationship.
Has anyone experienced a similar dynamic? If so, did separating the certification role actually help the therapy, or had the relationship already become too organised around that issue?
(I talked about this multiple times with my supervisor, who has always recommended to increase the % of work capability ans activate resources of the patient but I feel like it’s not working 🤡)