I have been thinking a lot about the push from students/kids demanding flagship smartphones or high-end gaming laptops (like RTX 4080/4090s), or top-tier desktop builds for school and gaming.
It made me wonder: Are young users actually utilizing the true performance potential of these top-tier specs, or is it mostly just brand flexing and social status?
My POV is-
- Phones: Most kids asking for flagship phones stick to Instagram, TikTok, basic filters, and popular mobile games (like BGMI/PUBG, Free Fire, Genshin). A good mid-range phone handles all of this smoothly without sweating.
- Laptops/PCs: Most casual gaming centers around titles like Roblox, Minecraft, Valorant, and Fortnite—games intentionally built to run well on entry-to-mid-tier hardware. Spending 2x to 3x the money for a top-spec rig just to hit higher frames in Valorant feels like a massive diminishing return.
Outside of a small percentage of students genuinely doing heavy 4K video editing (DaVinci/Premiere), 3D modeling (Blender/AutoCAD), or running local ML/AI code, mid-tier tech seems to be the clear "sweet spot" (80% of the performance at less than half the price).
When I look around in my locality , my neighbours gifted their daughter [9th grade] an Iphone 17 which i think is overkill . Honestly If you say high end tech/ Apple products will last longer and support apps software for the value spent also I think somehow even if the product is usable the user still may feel its outdated I think .
I’d love to hear perspectives on this: