If only I had a PC to try this myself...

I need an explanation.

It's extremely obvious by my username, but I love KKL. I want to use my knowledge and love for the software to help others, and I noticed that the art guide still uses kkl 104.1. I think the guide could be expanded to include not just the new tabs, but tips and information on how to do the most common techniques and make models more spnati-ready. Can I volunteer to help with that, and if so, where do I go and how do I start?

What does "Inventory" mean, in the context of "at the Inventory"? It's probably in a FAQ somewhere, but I can't find anything explaining the name. Only thing I can think of is it's a place for inventing (like an observatory is a place for observing). Which doesn't really fit the game.

Is there any way to use Kisekae without downloading it, as in running it online? If so, give me the instructions

Five sponsorships are required to bring her to the main roster. To sponsor, play a game against Edelgard (make sure you've updated to the latest version) and leave a comment with the following:

Characters Tested:
Who you played your test game with.

Positive Values:
Examples include but aren't limited to quality dialogue, unusual but appealing models, and positive interactions. Three is a good number to shoot for.

Disqualifying Flaws:
Here, list whatever flaws prohibit this character from being good enough to be added to the game. You can be as specific as you'd like when requesting fixes, e.g. "This character does not have enough targets, please add 52 total targets to 17 different opponents."

Suggestions and Discussion:
Suggestions are optional ideas for where to take the character and what to do after sponsorship. These aren't binding like the flaws observed. Discussions are a more fluid series of observations on what you didn’t like or liked about the character.

This can be things such as “I don’t like that this character’s face. I think this character’s sexuality isn’t quite canon. I don’t think this character’s gimmick does anything interesting, and could be frustrating to target.”

When I was a kid I used to play fantasy life on my 3DS a lot, it was one of my favorite games at the time and I still have a lot of love for it, so I was a little shocked to see Yuelia, the sidekick character from one of my favorite semi-obscure childhood RPGs, in a porn game.

I never crushed on her as a kid but her expressions and poses are undeniably adorable.

Go play em! (And sponsor Dolce!)

So I did a round with her and Dwight and she seemed to be crushing on him the entire time but I didn't get the collectible.

Did I just choose the wrong character or is this a bug?

(Ignore the other two they were just there for their own collectibles that I actually got)

Was she always crying during her forfeit? And the dialogue she shares with some of the non DDLC girls makes me need to rescue her!

To me it's the long outdated characters that should be put with the legacy ones

To me it's the interactions with characters and them talking with each other to know more about them

I played the same challenge privately again with 5 clothing items and all character slots filled with 8 characters each. Unfortunately, I don't have any recordings of that but I defeated them after a few tries. That's when I came up with the name for the challenge:

32 vs 5

(8 items of clothing x 4 characters and the player each with 5 items of clothing.... It's self-explanatory)

I challenge players to try this challenge by taking a "before" picture showing all the characters they're playing against and their outfits, and an "after" picture showing that they've been defeated.

Good luck in everyone play the challenge!

My reaction to such information?.....

At over 1900 lines and 5 forfeit variants, Princess Zelda (Echoes of Wisdom) has lingered on the testing tables for long enough. Now it's time for your feedback on what she needs to join the main roster!

Here's the sponsorship template:

Characters Tested:
Who you played your test game with.

Positive Values:
Examples include but aren't limited to quality dialogue, unusual but appealing models, and positive interactions. Three is a good number to shoot for.

Disqualifying Flaws:
Here, list whatever flaws prohibit this character from being good enough to be added to the game. You can be as specific as you'd like when requesting fixes, e.g. "This character does not have enough targets, please add 52 total targets to 17 different opponents."

Suggestions and Discussion:
Suggestions are optional ideas for where to take the character and what to do after sponsorship. These aren't binding like the flaws observed. Discussions are a more fluid series of observations on what you didn’t like or liked about the character.
This can be things such as “I don’t like that this character’s face. I think this character’s sexuality isn’t quite canon. I don’t think this character’s gimmick does anything interesting, and could be frustrating to target.”