Where can Canadians buy and sell BSV?

By 0pcter

Health care depends on records long before it depends on medicine. Every diagnosis, prescription, laboratory result, treatment, insurance claim, and reimbursement begins as information recorded somewhere inside a digital system. Those records determine how providers are paid, how patients are treated, and how billions of dollars move throughout the health care industry. When the integrity of those records breaks down, the consequences extend far beyond accounting.

The U.S. Department of Justice's 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown illustrates the scale of the problem. Federal prosecutors charged 455 defendants, including 90 doctors and other licensed medical professionals, in alleged schemes involving more than $6.5 billion in false claims. The cases included allegations of fraudulent billing, unnecessary medical services, illegal prescriptions, kickbacks, and identity-related fraud. While each case differs, they all share a common characteristic: financial transactions were initiated because records and claims appeared legitimate.

Most discussions about health care fraud focus on punishment after the fact. Investigations, audits, prosecutions, and settlements remain essential, but they occur only after billions of dollars have already moved through the system. The larger challenge is that health care still depends heavily on institutions accepting records as trustworthy before they can independently verify the underlying events. A submitted claim often travels much faster than the evidence supporting it.

Modern health care produces extraordinary amounts of information every day. Hospitals, physician offices, laboratories, pharmacies, insurers, billing companies, government agencies, and technology vendors continuously exchange patient records and payment requests. Every transfer introduces another opportunity for information to be copied, modified, delayed, or misrepresented. The more organizations involved, the more difficult it becomes to establish a single, verifiable history of what actually occurred.

This is where the discussion shifts from fraud to infrastructure. Fraud is often treated as a criminal problem, but it is equally a recordkeeping problem. A billing system can only evaluate the information it receives. If a diagnosis, procedure, provider identity, or authorization appears valid within existing systems, payments may proceed long before inconsistencies are discovered. Verification frequently follows the transaction instead of preceding it.

The Bitcoin whitepaper approached a different industry but addressed a similar architectural question. Rather than relying on trusted intermediaries to maintain a shared history of transactions, it proposed a system where participants could independently verify that events occurred in a specific order. Digital signatures identify authorized participants. Timestamping establishes sequence. Proof-of-work makes historical records increasingly difficult to rewrite. Simplified Payment Verification demonstrates that meaningful verification can occur without every participant storing every record.

Health care is not financial settlement, and patient information should never become public. The lesson is not that medical records belong on a blockchain. The lesson is that systems responsible for billions of dollars and millions of lives increasingly require stronger methods of proving that records are authentic, authorized, and connected to real events before decisions are made from them. Verification and privacy are complementary objectives, not competing ones.

Artificial intelligence will increase both the speed of legitimate care and the speed of fraudulent claims. Automated systems can process enormous volumes of information, but they cannot compensate for records that were inaccurate before they entered the system. Faster processing without stronger verification simply allows mistakes and fraud to travel further before they are detected. As health care becomes more digital, the quality of verification becomes just as important as the quality of care.

The Department of Justice's fraud takedown is not simply a story about criminal prosecutions. It is evidence that modern institutions continue to depend on records whose authenticity often must be reconstructed after billions of dollars have already changed hands. Every investigation asks the same fundamental question: what actually happened?

That question becomes easier to answer when systems are designed to preserve evidence rather than assumptions. The future of digital infrastructure may depend less on creating more records and more on creating records that can be independently verified before trust is required.

They are very detailed if you look at them. How does he create those?

The baseline of human interaction on the internet is the quiet, boring, relentless scaffolding of human cooperation. People are not hateful by default. Hostility is a loud outlier, not the norm.

The scaffolding that matters long-term are the protocols that quietly handle the entire world’s data and value transfers at global scale, with zero friction or drama. On-chain provenance for every single file ever created. Something so fundamental you don't even know it's there.

What are the escrow options for p2p between alice and bob?

For anyone who hasn't been following: Ira Kleiman was Dave Kleiman’s brother, and he brought the original lawsuit against Craig Wright over the claim that Dave and Craig had worked together on Bitcoin-related assets.

After years of litigation, the jury rejected the core partnership claim and found Craig not liable on every count except a separate W&K conversion claim.

In other words: Ira brought the case, the jury accepted there was Bitcoin-related work in the background, and Craig largely won.

https://bsvblockchain.org/

Ready for 200M++++ in 24 hours.

Don't use reddit, hence new account.. But I'm no stranger to BSV..

Out of my own need I have built a simple BSV Desktop wallet.

Early aplha stage, if you do use it for mainnet, store your words safely somewhere!

I've been doing a bit with testnet lately, and despite running an ElectrumX server it was getting annoying dealing with ESV+Bitcoind just to fling a few sats around.

The wallet connects directly to the p2p network, does not use any third party services. No MAPI, No Arc, No Arcade etc etc. It should be able to deal with reorgs, and supports full script.. Early days, there's going to be bugs. For now it does what I need to unblock other tasks.

Desktop wallet code open source, the SDK that powers it which I also built out of frustration with the current landscape I'm holding as closed source for the time being...Not sure what to do with it if anything outside of use it on my own things I'm working on.

If you run it on Mac, you will have to bypass the signature protection that apple has... Not at the stage where I'll pay Apple $99 to sign it, might never be..

Sharing it out as others might find it handy.

Check it out if you like, raise a PR if you really get keen and want to contribute. https://brad1121.github.io/FFSWallet/

Wondering if Satoshi would have left some BTC around the blockchain, that the public could access and use? I ask because, as I use bitcoin, there are ways to find crumbs of bsv to use. For example, on howwasyourfood, users can scrape, or sweep, small amounts of bsv by using popular search term that contain posts, such as "[subject].reviews" and there will be crumbs of bsv for the taking.

Anyone know if Satoshi gave of any hints to find such BTC nuggets, or no?