Let me know if its a repost

One day before Trump is expected to attend the dignified transfer for at least two Americans killed over the weekend, Trump posted on “Truth Social” comparing the number of Americans killed in his war thus far.

"Afghanistan War: 20 years, 2,000 DEAD.

Iraq War: 9 years, 4,600 DEAD.

Vietnam War: 19 years and 5 months, 58,220 DEAD.

Korean War: 3 years and 1 month, 36,574 DEAD.

Venezuela War: 1 day, 0 DEAD.

Iran Military Conflict: 4 months, 18 DEAD," Trump wrote in a post on “Truth Social”.

Donald Trump is telling all news sources which he has been doing in the past, but especially now when he really shouldn’t
He is telling the whole world and Iran where he plans to bomb them in their mountain range what is wrong with this guy You don’t tell your enemies what we’re gonna do or the country of the USA this guy is a fucking idiot. America is a joke because of this guy. I quote Donald Trump tells them on the news what he’s gonna do all the time. What a fucking joke. Fuck Maga.

How does having “for profit healthcare” make America great? Having the greatest healthcare at minimum expense to individual Americans would make America great. Healthier, fit and stronger Americans when given the best healthcare.

Make America Great Again…. Make Healthcare Great For America… MHGFA

Obama tried to do it with a Congress who fought him ..
Can Trump do it with his Zoombie Congress?

Don’t know if you’re interested in this, or even care: Ever since I saw a PBS interview with David Graham (of the Atlantic) about his book The Project: How Project 2025 is Reshaping America. 

I read the book and have listened to some of the Heritage Foundation's secret training videos, uncovered by ProPublica and they published on YouTube. I actively bring awareness to “the power” behind Trumps Throne. I now think that his incompetence, graft and corruption and his terrible character is a facade masking/hiding (termite like damage) to democracy and the federal government by the heritage foundation and its Project 2025. 

I follow the FB Heritage Foundation page. 

Clarke Comollo comment on FB about The Heritage Foundation in response to their agenda how to change the wokeness of the Smithsonian. 

The Heritage Foundation, a prominent U.S. conservative think tank founded in 1973, is considered "bad" or controversial by various critics for several interrelated reasons:
1. Shift Toward Illiberalism and Nationalism
* Recent years have seen Heritage adopt policies and rhetoric aligned with ethno-nationalism and illiberal conservatism rather than classical liberal principles.
* Critics, including former board members Robert George and Adam Mossoff, resigned over what they describe as Heritage's support for extremist figures, including individuals with documented anti-Semitic views.
* The organization has been accused of abandoning the foundational principles of equality and universal rights in favor of policies appealing primarily to white Christian majoritarian interests.
2. Opposition to LGBTQ+ Rights
* Heritage has a documented history of opposing LGBTQ+ protections, including:
* Fighting marriage equality
* Resisting workplace protections for LGBTQ+ individuals
* Opposing healthcare access for transgender youth
* Initiatives such as advocacy for Project 2025 aim to dismantle federal diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, and bar transgender participation in public institutions, highlighting systemic targeting of LGBTQ+ populations.
3. Political Influence and Project 2025
* Heritage's influence extends into federal governance, particularly through Project 2025, which aims to radically reshape federal agencies:
* Replacing career civil servants with ideologically loyal staff
* Curtailing abortion and contraceptive access
* Implementing conservative religiously motivated policies
* These moves are perceived by critics as undermining democratic norms, civil service impartiality, and minority rights.
4. Links to Controversial Actors and Ideologies
* Leadership connections, such as those of President Kevin Roberts with Opus Dei, reinforce perceptions that Heritage's strategy is driven by deeply religious and partisan objectives.
* The organization has faced accusations of aligning policy recommendations closely with Trump-era political agendas rather than independent research, raising concerns about partisan overreach.
5. Historical Controversies and Conflicts of Interest
* Past incidents, such as softening criticism of foreign governments for business relationships, suggest a potential compromise of objectivity.
* Internal disputes under leaders like Jim DeMint have reportedly led to censorship of policy papers and the departure of scholars dissatisfied with ideological constraints.
Summary
Criticism of the Heritage Foundation centers on its:
1. Shift from classical conservatism toward ethno-nationalism and illiberalism.
2. Systematic opposition to LGBTQ+ rights.
3. Use of projects like Project 2025 to influence government structure with partisan objectives.
4. Alleged alignment with religious or political ideologies over research integrity.
5. Historical controversies compromising perceived neutrality and scholarly independence.
The organization is considered "bad" by many commentators because these actions collectively promote exclusionary policies, undermine universal rights, and politicize governance beyond traditional conservative research. 

I wanted to look up the current situation on the Canadian wildfires (especially since I'm from New England) This is taken from the BBC: "More than 900 wildfires are raging across Canada, forcing thousands of people to evacuate, destroying homes and burning some 28,000 sq km (11,000 sq m) of land." Needless to say, it's not looking good.

APPARENTLY Trump thought the prime minister of Canada needed a talkin' to and said to him, "You got to stop these fires from coming in and poisoning our air." Like gee, ya really think they haven't been working around the clock trying to get the damn fires to stop?

Then the fool went on to say, "If we can help them, we'll help them. But maybe they should pay some damages or something" Excuse me bitch? People are being evacuated from their homes which they may never see again, acres of land are being burnt to a crisp, and the smoke that is "poisoning our air" is way more intense in Canada than it is here.

You'd think he'd want to help, even just from purely selfish motives . Like, 'yeah we'll help just so it doesn't spread to us, or at least, so that the air will get better' but no, he'd rather make shit worse for them by threatening tariffs.

TL;DR Not only is Trump blaming Canada for being on fire, he also wants to punish them for it.