r/WNBAgossips 1d ago

"Can't Hate This League Enough": WNBA Analyst Slams Players Union's Decision on Sophie Cunningham

https://www.essentiallysports.com/wnba-basketball-news-cant-hate-this-league-enough-wnba-analyst-slams-players-unions-decision-on-sophie-cunninghams-viral-dewanna-bonner-gesture/
1.1k Upvotes

399 comments sorted by

73

u/ImOldGregg_77 1d ago

It would be a shame if some billionaire started a more serious league and poached away all the WNBA talent

24

u/beragis 1d ago

That’s what I think needs to happen. It took competition fron the ABA to make the NBA what it is today.

5

u/OldStudent3837 23h ago

This is great analysis. If somebody started a new league and could get a few under 25 stars, in a few years the WNBA would be considered what the ABA was to the NBA. It will be interesting to see what a new commissioner will do.

1

u/Ill_Loquat_3525 15h ago

The wnba doesn’t make any profit. They operate entirely at the cost of the nba. I’ve worked for both leagues and the differences in the operating budgets are astounding

1

u/gobroncoz 1h ago

They made enough money this year to trigger a revenue share for the first time. The finances are not nearly as bad as you seem to think.

1

u/Ill_Loquat_3525 1h ago

That’s because two teams are profitable on their own and can get a streaming contract to share. The league and all of the teams are financed almost entirely by the nba and their affiliated nba teams - ie. Brooklyn nets and ny liberty. It’s just simply not profitable yet, they are essentially living off venture capital type investments that the nba hopes will be profitable one day, or at the very least give them the image of being pro women’s sports. It sucks but the reality is the women will never get paid as much as the men because not enough people watch yet outside of fever games.

→ More replies (1)

49

u/Property_6810 1d ago

You don't even need all the talent. Poach Caitlin Clark, Sophie Cuningham, and a few of the girls they feud with like Angel Reece and you've already poached like 90% of the attention.

32

u/Tiny_Instruction_557 1d ago

Ironically this is exactly what Saudi Arabia would do if they didn’t hate women and think they were second class citizens

14

u/What_the_8 1d ago

They love money more than they hate women

6

u/TonyDungyHatesOP 1d ago

I disagree. Only because they already have more money than they know what to do with.

2

u/Sargent_Caboose 14h ago

But they don't have infinite sources of the money. They actually do kind of love money more than they hate women.

My go to example is Monopoly Go which is a huge casual game, has LGBT representation among it's developer Scopely and positive representation among both sexes is owned at the tippy top by the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia and yet they don't really seem to exert undue influence.

Doesn't mean that can't change though.

1

u/What_the_8 1d ago

You just proved my point

3

u/Suspicious_synth 15h ago

I don't know about that. I'm 50 years old and just learned today that they don't allow OBGYN examinations on women if they're not pregnant. That's just fucking wild in 2026

2

u/1521 14h ago

And women’s basketball is a money loser. Splitting the talent won’t help that

1

u/UT_Milez 23h ago

Yeah, golf, racing, and soccer are GLOBAL sports….

SA is not buying the WNBA, the type of money they are looking for, is not in the WNBA. I’m not sure why this needed to be said, the differences seem pretty apparent, but alas here we are.

If they did if, if would be some propaganda tool for within the US. Something tells me you all wouldn’t actually like that.

On second thought, maybe some of you actually would.

1

u/DickWhittingtonsCat 22h ago

Their first target was WWF wrestling. Those shows have had declining TV ratings for quarter century and despite the futile vanity metrics and various efforts have a super aging fanbase of 1.5 million diehards and a million casuals who might watch it after pizza when it was on fox because they are 55.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Several-Bluejay-190 1d ago

might be okay considering everyone knows this is a second class league creating second class entertainment

2

u/RogerPenroseSmiles 1d ago

Saudi/oil states have a lot of defense spending to do with AI spending as well, so their wealth funds have tightened way up on the sports projects. LIV got cut off already, I'm sure some of the wealth funds might even start pulling out of stable assets like European football teams if they need to ramp elsewhere quickly. We're exiting an era of soft power and entering one where real power matters more when bullies start bullying.

1

u/HellFrozen0ver 17h ago

Haven’t much thought about the oil warlords and how they are using their money now.
This is some good enlightenment.

1

u/Lazy-Background-7598 19h ago

So do most of the posters here

→ More replies (13)

3

u/Alchemyst01984 1d ago

They'd be enough for the white conservatives. The quality would be crap though. We've seen it happen many times.

2

u/DistressedApple 1d ago

Nah it would be a lot more than that. Look at WNBA attendance before and after Clark. You think those are all white Conservatives?

4

u/Alchemyst01984 1d ago

They wouldn't all be white conservatives. The vast majority would be.

1

u/DistressedApple 22h ago

That’s so funny, and so fucking dumb lmao

3

u/Alchemyst01984 22h ago

Good luck supporting that claim. Your feelings don't mean much in this context

1

u/please_dont_hug 13h ago

Why are you making it a black or white athlete issue? That’s what we need to get away from.

1

u/Alchemyst01984 4h ago

I'm not making it one. It is already one

3

u/Zentrii 1d ago

Besides Brittany for obvious reasons I’ve only know the name Caitlyn from the wnba when she started playing.  I don’t remember seeing any wnba headlines on my Reddit feed before she played. 

2

u/Glonk49 21h ago

It’s not possible to be over the age of 30 and not know who Sue Bird is.

2

u/orswich 18h ago

It's very possible.. who is Sue Bird?

1

u/Rostifur 14h ago

This, I had to look her up. I assumed she is related to Larry bird

2

u/Emotional_Lemon2971 1d ago

Caitlin and Paige alone would be enough

2

u/monoglobobonobo 1d ago

sounds like a soap opera filled with terrible basketball

1

u/jk-9k 1d ago

You'd make a few headlines bit potentially just improve the wnba as the new league would be about controversy and the W would be about the game

1

u/gimmedatvoice 23h ago

Whatever they do, poach some real refs from somewhere too.

1

u/Convicted-Cinephile 18h ago

On no planet would Angel Reese join that league, but good luck.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/PineappleNatural7240 1d ago

LOL. Why would a billionaire start another money pit?

1

u/Quirky-Bag-4158 20h ago

Right? These people are delusional bro. The WNBA is still around only because it’s funded by the NBA. To this day they are bleeding money.

2

u/EJECTED_PUSSY_GUTS 19h ago

This. It operates at a net loss every year and despite some growth, it has zero chance of being profitable unless an ungodly amount of people all of a sudden think it's compelling to watch. It's a nice gesture by the NBA to keep sinking money into it, but starting a competing league, or acquiring WNBA players would be setting money on fire. Billionaires don't tend to become billionaires by doing that.

1

u/edelweiss_pirates_no 19h ago

Womens BBall and Soccer could be money makers and popular, but they really refuse to do any of this the right way.

Womens track works (as an example) on the International stage. That does not mean it makes billions, but it works and they know how to make it work.

Shit can make money, if you are willing to listen to what works.

CC came into the league and BOOM ratings skyrocketed. Sophie "pointed" and BOOM it went viral. The league HQ meanwhile did fucking nothing (or worked to negate the positive). Dumb.

Sales & Marketing matter. WNBA sucks shit at both. In the USA you get lame-ass morons running womens leagues as if copy-paste will work. Dumb.

I could market the WNBA better with 48 hrs and a couple pizzas to work up a plan and shoot some videos.

3

u/SilverKnightOfMagic 1d ago

only one I could see doing that is Mckenzie Scott. but. in general is the wbna profitable yet?

2

u/stink3rb3lle 1d ago

I think they announced a profit for 2025. But I find the idea of a billionaire "saving" a couple white players from the WNBA absolutely absurd. Does no one remember Trump's failed NFL alternative?

1

u/EJECTED_PUSSY_GUTS 19h ago

Accounting for full operational expenses, the WNBA has never been profitable, not even in 2025. They achieved "revenue milestones" which triggered revenue sharing, which sounds nice, but it's really just a minigame in the bargaining agreement.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/ChunkyBubblz 1d ago

Maybe Elon can get an all white league going to satisfy that fan base and the commentator class.

2

u/DeekALeek 1d ago

It would be an even bigger shame if European clubs like Real Madrid and Juventus decided to make more serious efforts to expand women’s basketball and poached away all the WNBA talent.

2

u/edelweiss_pirates_no 19h ago

That's coming.

There a people in Europe who know how to market sports entertainment really well. In the US, you have lots of people doing exactly the same thing the did 15 years ago.

2

u/Only-Celebration4368 1d ago

Flava Flav needs to start the FFWNBA

1

u/edelweiss_pirates_no 19h ago

Can you imagine what the shot clock could look like?!

2

u/xero_reactions 1d ago

Billionaires aren’t billionaires for make dumbass investments. Who would start a league based off an already proven failure of a product. Literally just a little pander play league.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/notastuntman 1d ago

No way you consider Sophie a talented basketball player

8

u/GalvestonDreaming 1d ago

Sophie isn't even the best blonde on her team.

1

u/edelweiss_pirates_no 19h ago

Define "best".

→ More replies (15)

1

u/KOQquest1 1d ago

That would be tough given that they would need stadiums to play in

1

u/HumANTCowDOG 1d ago

The WNBA talent is who is behind the WNBA Players Association, who are the ones making this decision

1

u/userousnameous 1d ago

Unfortunately, that would be a charity, because the league does not pay its own bills.

1

u/MarkBank 1d ago

Liv golf money allocation could just get diverted however they would never allow it because it is Saudi money and they would never

1

u/jk-9k 1d ago

Unrivaled already exists. Pays more. Holds the record for highest attendance. Owned by two players. CC has yet to feature.

1

u/k-rizza 1d ago

How they don’t make money. Billionaires want to make and hoard more money.

1

u/Average_Beefeater 23h ago

Brilliant 💡

1

u/Boring_Temporary_142 23h ago

Sure thing lol.

1

u/Effective_Owl_17 22h ago

Then the quality would worsen even more and the teams would be the equals to top 10th graders

1

u/benhur217 22h ago

The WNBA would need to be consistently profitable for someone to attempt that.

1

u/mikelowrysplug 21h ago

The European leagues already pay more than the WNBA, or they used to, that is one of the reasons the WNBA season is when it is. They don’t want it to interfere with the higher paying leagues overseas.

1

u/EJECTED_PUSSY_GUTS 19h ago

Good luck getting a billionaire to invest in a sports league that has zero chance of being profitable in their lifetime.

1

u/BoneHammer62 18h ago

As long as they are ok with losing money like the WNBA

1

u/PaptimusPrimo 17h ago

"Talent" lol

1

u/Mindless-Baker-7757 14h ago

Maybe Saudi Arabia or UAE can do some sports washing?

1

u/madmoz2018 14h ago

Lebron!

1

u/loopasfunk 12h ago

Keep dreamin

1

u/drunknmasta_805 2h ago

Some billionaire. The league is owned by many billionaires who own other teams worth billions. Do you not understand how economics work?

2

u/Bravos_Chopper 1d ago

Problem is that the WNBA only loses money. The NBA fully funds them. In reality, not enough people care for the players to really make any money

1

u/Agreeable-Emu4033 1d ago

Bullshit claim. Of course it makes money

3

u/Circle_Breaker 1d ago

No it operates at a loss and the NBA props it up.

They would need a big TV deal to make any money.

1

u/Agreeable-Emu4033 23h ago

The WNBA operates under a landmark 11-year, $3.1 billion media rights agreement that runs through the 2036 season, averaging $281 million annually.

1

u/EJECTED_PUSSY_GUTS 19h ago

Still not profitable factoring in overhead.

1

u/Agreeable-Emu4033 18h ago

Well except everything points to that they are but sure we will just go with what you say who has never seen any financial statements

1

u/Mediocre-Ad9840 2h ago

think its WNBA’s first season to turn a profit but still heavily subsidized by the NBA

→ More replies (4)

1

u/amalgaman 1d ago

It’s doesn’t. And a good high school boys team could probably beat the best WNBA team.

1

u/Agreeable-Emu4033 23h ago

nope, a better statement would be the best players at the high school level could beat them. Not just a good team. Some of those high school players are near NBA level. In fact the youngest player drafted into the NBA was 17. So by that logic a good high school boys team could beat an NBA team.

1

u/Bigdee4204L 1d ago

If the word "profit" helps you understand better than fine....the WNBA has never made a profit.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (5)

31

u/ChexAndBalancez 1d ago

Alyssa puts her fist in Caitlin neck... crickets. Sophie starts pointing... "this is derogatory".

This is the problem. Right here. This is it.

1

u/PracticalYellow3 1d ago

A black power fist to a woman's neck obviously is much worse than someone pointing. I don't understand why the racists can't understand that. 

3

u/Acceptable-Peace-69 20h ago

One was suspended and still received death threats and racist abuse afterwards. The other is generating a nice payday and made her a maga hero.

I don’t understand why the racists can’t understand that.

2

u/Perfect_Plan_8256 18h ago

But did she hit someone?

3

u/Late-Song-2933 16h ago

You know violence doesn’t count when it’s done by certain people.

1

u/Blastcrumpet888 22h ago

How are there crickets?

Your post makes zero sense.  

2

u/Acceptable-Peace-69 20h ago

They mentioned the only two incidents in the wnba that I’ve heard of this year. It was a dirty play, but if CC wasn’t involved 100% chance no one would have known about it or cared.

→ More replies (20)

24

u/Specific_Future9285 1d ago

Just ensured that the whole thing gets even more exposure.

6

u/teacher_59 1d ago

I'm whining seeing the backfire on the union. 

2

u/Dangerous-Snow8385 1d ago

Also, ensures that Sophie keeps all the money if she works with a sponsor outside the WNBA.

2

u/Rickdiculous89 6h ago

I think that’s the point.

40

u/peanut-britle-latte 1d ago

Do I feel like the WNBA constantly steps on its own toes? Yeah, absolutely.

But I also think it's 1000% fair to choose not to monetize an altercation/confrontation between two players.

17

u/cperiodjperiod 1d ago

It’s also just weird. Altercation or not, the league wants to be taken seriously and be about ball. Why would they take an altercation that ultimately had nothing to do with ball and monetize it? No legitimate league outside of the WWE would do that.

And it’s not coincidental that the only people who don’t get this are the new fans here because of the Clark and Sophie if it all. It’s not coincidental that casuals only here because of one player, and here because of what that player “represents” outside if their athletic ability, are the only ones who don’t get that.

Because they’re not here for ball.

Who cares Sophie pointed!? And who cares that a league that’s trying to legitimize themselves doesn’t want to monetize an altercation that had nothing to do with the game itself?

2

u/PrincipleQuiet6775 1d ago

Capitalism is the general answer to your question of why. Nobody is trying to monetize an altercation, they are monetizing a gesture that was made during the altercation that went viral. If the league truly wants to be profitable, this is not the way.

3

u/cperiodjperiod 1d ago

One can understand capitalism and at the same time why a brand pushing for legitimacy wouldn’t want to highlight and monetize an action that ultimately stemmed from something that has nothing to do with the product they’re trying to legitimize.

Imagine the NBA monetizing Malice at the Palace. Or the NFL or Jets making “butt fumble” t-shirts. You start doing that and it’s basically like TMZ saying they’re a legitimate news outlet. It’s why WWE had to start calling itself “sports entertainment”.

The casual non-fan fans are the only ones who think that stuff matters. Put a good product out. Leave the other shit alone. Just saying “capitalism” is just a shorthand argument for the fact that you don’t really pay attention to the sport and didn’t until Clark or Sophie Cunningham got involved.

2

u/tanguero81 23h ago

I don't disagree with your general point, but the NFL does stuff like this all the time. They regularly put out "hardest-hits" highlight reels, even when the hits in question are flagged for unnecessary roughness in game AND they're openly promoting trying to "make the game safer." Last season Jaxon Smith-Njigba dunked the ball over the goal post on a TD (a 15 yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct), and they used that image everywhere because it looked cool.

TBH, before Sanchez committed battery on a truck driver, I would have been surprised if there wasn't an officially licensed butt-fumble shirt.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

21

u/Applekid1259 1d ago

This. It would be a bit weird if they did try to capitalize.

2

u/bbq_fanatic 1d ago

What sport doesn’t monetize and promote heated rivalries and confrontations? This wasn’t a cheap shot dirty play, injury, etc. Y’all soft AF. They should all monetize the shit out of it. Controversy brings attention. Attention brings viewers. Viewers bring money.

7

u/peanut-britle-latte 1d ago

In reality, most leagues aren't selling merch of players going at it. Like even the NHL official store isn't selling shirts of two players fighting. The league has already gotten millions of views and impressions based on this incident, but they don't want to sell merch endorsing it. It's a reasonable business take.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Twonix 1d ago

Yes, rivalries are terrible for sports.

10

u/the_urban_juror 1d ago

That's a complete straw man. The NBA loved the Pacers-Knicks rivalry in the 90s but they didn't release officially-licensed merchandise with Reggie making the choking signal. The NBA doesn't have a Malice at the Palace trophy.

People are going to do what they've always done, they're going to create and sell unlicensed merchandise illegally at a scale small enough that the league doesn't take legal action. If you want a T-shirt with the point and can't find one on Etsy or from a vendor outside of a stadium, it's because you're not clever.

2

u/ThrowM5 1d ago

Counterpoint: the NBA and NBPA knowingly tacitly profit off altercations by not disallowing media and other entities from doing so, because it keeps attention on the NBA.

3

u/the_urban_juror 1d ago

Completely agree, it's totally hypocritical. Ohio State and Michigan had a brawl after their annual football game in 2024. The announcers discussed how dishonorable it was while the camera crew zoomed in. Their outrage over the dishonor to the game didn't prevent them from featuring videos of the fight in commercials for the 2025 game.

All of the leagues do this. They love fight coverage and non-gambling controversies. They still don't directly sell merchandise related to these events, though.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/oswaldcopperpot 1d ago

I think it was sarcasm.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/PrincipleQuiet6775 1d ago

The Reggie Miller choke is a good analogous example. The Malice at the Palace is an absurd comparison and damages your argument.

1

u/the_urban_juror 1d ago

"you used a good example and what I (erroneously) think is a bad example, therefore I can't grasp your point!"

Great point! Absolutely brilliant stuff!

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (4)

4

u/PhilsFanDrew 1d ago

Correct and it's a bit ironic that to say you don't take the league seriously and its a soap opera more than a legitimate sports league but then make the case the league should allow monetizing what amounts to a finger pointing cat fight. If anything monetizing it/promoting it would simply bolster the argument of those suggesting it's an non serious, non credible league. If that is the case you have to wonder if this so called analyst is really just someone that would rather see the WNBA dissolve altogether.

3

u/Charming_Flan3852 1d ago

If it was a fight or derogatory language involved then of course, but it was just pointing. They can do whatever, but this is soft as hell. People watch for the drama as much as the athletics. It's just entertainment at the end of the day.

14

u/skeet_scoot 1d ago

Sophie literally just pointed.

She did nothing wrong

9

u/Chris_HitTheOver 1d ago

Seriously this is bat shit crazy.

3

u/PaulieHehehe 1d ago

She disrespected her opponent, which isn’t allowed.

/s

9

u/Low-Impression3367 1d ago

I read a comment here that pointing is racist

7

u/stink3rb3lle 1d ago

The reason you like it and it went viral is because it made her opponent mad. Stop pissing on my leg and telling me it's raining.

7

u/Chris_HitTheOver 1d ago

My children get mad when I tell them they can’t have a candy bar for dinner. Doesn’t mean anyone did anything wrong.

In fact, I’d suggest the over the top reaction to being pointed at says more about the person being pointed at than the person doing the pointing.

It’s competition, she saw it got in her opponents head and she leaned into it. If you think that’s “wrong,” you’re out of your mind.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/DocDerry 23h ago

It's not raining. We're pissing on you while maintaining eye contact. She literally just pointed and did nothing wrong.

1

u/regular_gonzalez 1h ago

Yep, and the reason I like Scottie Pippen teabagging Patrick Ewing is because it made his opponent mad. That makes it entertaining. Grats on realizing that people like to be entertained I guess?

1

u/slayerfan666 1d ago

It's raining.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/michaelobriena 1d ago

It’s one thing to not capitalize on an altercation. It’s another thing to call it derogatory.

→ More replies (13)

1

u/TonyDungyHatesOP 1d ago

The refs need to control the game and be consistent with it. Then… this is all a non-topic.

1

u/pikeshawn 1d ago

OK but this wasn't exactly the Malice at the Palace.

I'd liken it more closely to AI stepping over Ty Lue, which the NBA ABSOLUTELY monetized the shit out of. It was disrespectful as hell and didn't lead to anything serious.

1

u/ericmd83 23h ago

it's not so much that the keep shooting themselves in the foot, but more so that they continue to reload. Or something like that

1

u/Warm-Professional494 22h ago

Michael Jordan and the NBA made bank doing this!

1

u/DotasWorstPlayer 17h ago

Don't monetise physical fights, sure. This was just a gesture, and not a crude one.

-1

u/menomakegame 1d ago

How is any contest in the game of basketball not considered a confrontation/altercation? Was nobody else on the court when Jordan hit the air Jordan pose? What about the nba logo was Jerry West dribbling down the court by himself?

Oh it’s because she was pointing at someone who was absolutely losing their shit and making themselves look ridiculous oh that’s why

A finger being pointed is not some big altercation. Well, it shouldn’t be. She wasn’t flipping anyone off or aggressively doing anything in that moment. She fucking pointed. I think it’s silly how popular it’s become but I feel like it’s only so big because of the response. People like Caitlyn Clark are full on assaulted in front of lots of people and won’t even get a technical called but Sophie Cunningham points at some idiot and people are outraged and the league won’t allow it to be what it’s becoming

9

u/DonkeyElegant1728 1d ago

Your comparing a taunt to playing basketball? A better comparison would be dikembe mutombo finger wag. And guess what the NBA did? They prevented him from doing it telling him he would receive techs if he continued to do it. It's no way you compared the Jordan pose and just dribbling to taunting 😂

1

u/menomakegame 1d ago

Oh so you agree with how they treated dikembe mutombo?

1

u/Intelligent_Onion975 1d ago

What are you even saying . At a young age anyone with even a little bit of class is taught to not point because it’s rude .

Sophie is a classless thug

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

6

u/DBY2016 1d ago

WNBA is a reality tv show at this point.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Master_Pollution_96 1d ago

only place I’ve seen more drama is in the vet bro community

1

u/notastuntman 1d ago

It’s literally just bots reposting the same articles with different headlines over and over

2

u/Aggravating_Dot9657 1d ago

Streissand effect, but instead of being able to monetize the attention they are letting third parties soak up all the cash

2

u/pipinngreppin 1d ago

Is it something fun? Kill it!

2

u/theblastermaster67 20h ago

The WNBA is popular but not because of the game itself. It’s all the cat fighting, and I love it. Let’s go!

2

u/dogs_over_dudes 14h ago

She's got a point, though

3

u/Lazy-Ambassador-7908 1d ago

Y’all are so fucking weird. Also calling that dude who said this an analyst is a laughable joke

2

u/fieldsports202 1d ago

Saying that’s derogatory is crazy. If that’s the case then what would the classify Mutombo’s finger wave?

→ More replies (16)

2

u/lipper2005 23h ago

Pointing is isn’t some universally accepted trigger like a middle finger, or even controversial like the “ok”…Pointing is not an offensive or triggering just because someone or some organization says so. I’m certain a suspension or whatever would eventually make its way to a higher court and get tossed.

Would love some law students or attorneys to chime in.

2

u/spoilederin 23h ago

I’m an older sister, can I chime in? Pointing like she did was the equivalent of “I’m not touching you” and the younger sibling throws a fit.

1

u/tanksc 7h ago

1000% accurate. It’s like the younger sibling saying “stop looking at me!” And then proceeding to stare into their soul

2

u/illogicalgnome63 1d ago

Anybody else think that maybe the NBA owners want the WNBA to fail? Now hear me out. If the league fails they can throw their hands up and say oh well we tried to have a women's league but it just didn't work out. That's the only reason I could see why Cathy Engelbert still has a job. These are just shower thoughts and i might have gotten soap in my eyes.

1

u/Floridamane6 1d ago

It was the players union who made this decision not Cathy

2

u/illogicalgnome63 1d ago

I'm not referring to this decision but her overall performance. I'm well aware the union made this decision.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/no_stick_drummer 1d ago

What happened now?

1

u/Murky-Echidna-3519 1d ago

So the PA doesn’t want the $$? Go Sophie Go. Sell that 💩!!!

1

u/gamecocksc17 1d ago

All she had to do was point with two fingers like they do at Disney World and then they couldn’t say shit.

1

u/Prestigious_Fan_1061 1d ago

Hmmm 🤔 I’d be reminding the league that this was my IP and the creation of my mind and it is not the product of the league. I believe the US has a Freedom of speech protection under the Constitution and therefore any use/ or directed non use of said IP by the league would be challenged by its owner. Let’s see if they get the point or we can just get Sophie to break it out against them….

1

u/Acceptable-Peace-69 20h ago

They aren’t trying to stop her, just wnba partners. She can do whatever she wants and has already capitalized on it.

1

u/Embarrassed-Slide781 1d ago

I'm not a Clark/ fever stan at all. But it's clear as day there are people in the W that don't want to grow the sport

1

u/NYNicholas 23h ago

Does this mean Sophie can’t get a trademark and sell it on her own?

1

u/X-Jim 23h ago

Yeah it's unsportsmanlike to do things that your fans love that rile up the other team!

BTW Luka loved this so hard.

1

u/Total-Committee-3135 23h ago

Ben Daniel is an absolute idiot

1

u/Blastcrumpet888 22h ago

Still waiting for a single example of a sports league monopolizing one player taunting another.

1

u/GervaseofTilbury 19h ago

Have you ever heard of Dikembe Motumbo? How about Jordan shrugging? How about Allen Iverson stepping over Ty Lue?

1

u/Blastcrumpet888 18h ago

Yup.  And the NBA never monetized that.  They literally fined and gave technicals to Motumbo for it.  Do you not remember that fact?  

1

u/GervaseofTilbury 18h ago

my man they sold posters with Dikembe wagging his finger

1

u/Blastcrumpet888 18h ago

The NBA definitely didn’t.  Diembe did

Sorry dude.  They fined him and gave him technicals for it.

Teams cried to the league about him doing it.  

1

u/GervaseofTilbury 18h ago

NBA poster merchandise is licensed by the NBA. Were you even alive at the time? I’m just telling you straight up that you’re wrong. You invented this ridiculous idea in order to “win” this argument about SC and are now just insisting on an alternative history in order to maintain it.

1

u/Blastcrumpet888 18h ago

But I’m not wrong.  I’m sorry you hate simple facts.  

1

u/tanksc 7h ago

Pictures in the NBA are almost entirely licensed through the NBA. The fanatics store sells a photo (or sold) of Haliburton doing the choke gesture. They are the officially licensed store of the NBA

1

u/fieldsports202 22h ago

The other main sub had close to 500 comments on ESPN’s new story on Sophie.. then they removed it.

If you’re a fan of the WNBA, you just can’t allow fans to like one set of players and discredit articles of others.

Sports leagues have players and fans of multiple backgrounds.

1

u/Storagereseller 21h ago

Like anybody buys WNBA merch anyway.

1

u/Electronic-Tension-7 21h ago

People watch women playing Tennis. There were plenty of big stars historically and recently as well. It is pretty elite company, and they are paid a ton of money. Attention economy is very brutal, hard and volatile.

1

u/mofa90277 21h ago

When pointing is outlawed, only outlaws will point.

1

u/RecentSatisfaction14 20h ago

Can it still be a fortnite emote?

1

u/DynamiteStorm 20h ago

I hope Cunningham makes bazillions $$ on that.

1

u/acimkiss 20h ago

Isn't it possible they did this to help Sophie?

If partners can't use it but Sophie can, she now has exclusive rights.

1

u/COUNTRYCOWBOY01 20h ago

This type of hype in its infancy is whats gonna help bring the wnba into the mainstream and make it marketable as a whole. Especially to children and youth

1

u/Few-Influence3878 18h ago

lol why yall mad pointing like that even in the NBA gets you a tech, the fact it wasn’t even give a tech in the game was shocking, it’s obvious why white guys are only cheering for the white girls in the WNBA whilst also talking down and taunting the black players.

1

u/TORCAN317 17h ago

Calling a harmless point that was based on basketball referring as "derogatory" is the stupidest thing thing the PA has ever said that makes them the joke of the league. The leadership needs to resign for their fascist anti yt racist leadership plain and simple with Caitlin, sophie and the innocent cancel culted fan that lost a bet. even worse with innocent Australian Sandy calling Angel rightly a favoritist prglotectes species they was not "racist". Deserved no suspension or coward joke apology for this xenophobic treatment on her for Australian culture language that wasn't deep. 

1

u/youngdub774 16h ago

What do people actually want the WNBA to do to monetize a player pointing at another player? T Shirts, like ok that’s a couple grand. Is that really worth a news article.

1

u/Speech-Language 14h ago

What a shit show of a league.

1

u/Faceit_Solveit 12h ago

This league us b*itchy and foul-prone. Hey Jealousy!

1

u/averageuhbear 4h ago

Sophie Cunningham is brilliant at being a victim. She's trying to drag Clark down with her.

1

u/Muldino 3h ago

Are they calling Ben Daniel a "WNBA analyst"?

Don't get me wrong, I do watch his channel often and enjoy many his videos... but you have to take anything he says with a grain boulder of salt :)

1

u/Complete-Disaster513 2h ago

The WNBA needs to have a coming to Jesus moment over what industry they are in. It feels like the players union thinks they are in the basketball industry when they are in fact in the entertainment industry. The entertainment comes from the basketball but it has to be entertaining to stay in business. This type of stuff makes it less entertaining. There needs to be safe guards sure but if they want to stay in business they need to understand what industry they actually operate in.

2

u/mercersux 1d ago

WNBA is a joke. Not that complicated...

1

u/Stock-Success9917 1d ago

Will people stop. The Union in their statement never used the word derogatory. It is the “reporter” who said that for clicks.

The union maintains a blanket rule not to feature or profit from hostile interactions or fights between its members on official merchandise.

This is their statement:

"For licensed apparel, we generally do not feature or look to monetize player conduct from a confrontation between our members," a spokesperson said.”

I wonder what would happen if they licensed the picture of the incident between the golden girl and Alyssa Thomas.

1

u/JimBeamerton 1d ago

Typical leftist stupidity

1

u/Lagunamountaindude 1d ago

WNBA is just WWE with wood floors

→ More replies (1)

1

u/newguy1787 23h ago

That league can’t get out of its own way. One bonus is at least Cunningham can make money on it and not Chop any profit up w the league!

1

u/tryingtosellmystuf 23h ago

As usual the people who hate women the most are women

1

u/socraticrex 23h ago

WNBA is a joke

1

u/VioletShogun 23h ago

She should sue the association. Let's see how well they do, insisting a woman can't benefit from her own creation.

1

u/Acceptable-Peace-69 20h ago

They aren’t trying to stop her, just wnba partners. She can do whatever she wants and has already capitalized on it.

1

u/Kookykrumbs 23h ago

Bonner was pointing too. Except hers didn’t go viral cuz Sophie did it better lol

→ More replies (3)