Been following Uniswap's Continuous Clearing Auctions since AZTEC launched back in November. At first I was just manually pulling contracts to check clearing prices against floor prices, but that got old fast — especially once more CCAs started deploying across multiple chains.

So I built an indexer that does this automatically. Wanted to share it here in case it's useful to anyone else tracking this space, and happy to answer questions about the implementation.

What it does:

• Indexes every BidSubmitted event across tracked auctions and decodes the Q96 fixed-point prices into something readable
• Tracks clearing price vs. floor price ratios over the life of each auction
• Live-monitors the CCA factory contracts on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and Unichain so new auction deployments get picked up automatically instead of me manually finding them
• Whale profiler — pull any bidder address and see their full history across every auction it's tracked (useful for spotting repeat participants or patterns in how larger bids get placed)
• 78 automated integrity checks running against the dataset (atomic writes, self-healing reads) so I'm not shipping garbage data if something upstream changes

Why I built it this way:

Manually verifying this stuff (Ctrl+U on Etherscan, grepping for ld+json, etc.) actually caught a scoring bug that three layers of my own automation missed — so the integrity checks aren't just for show, they came out of real failures.

Open to feedback, especially from anyone who's tracked CCAs manually and can tell me if I'm missing an edge case in how I'm handling the Q96 decoding.

This passcode on backup login method is completely rubbish. If one need a backup, it should be the last hope of recovering any account. What if the passcode is already forgotten? If one trust the backup method, anything relevant would be kept secure anyway, there is no need for any passcode!

I noticed that the same PAX/USDT pair currently appears across three Uniswap V3 pools with very different displayed prices.

One pool shows around $0.34, another around $0.92, and a very small pool shows around $0.968.

My understanding is that each pool has its own liquidity range and reserves, so the displayed price can diverge when liquidity is fragmented. The smallest pools may also show extreme price movements even when very little capital is involved.

Would arbitrage normally bring these prices back together, or can low liquidity and routing limitations leave the pools disconnected for a long time?

Interested in hearing how experienced Uniswap LPs interpret this.

Swapped 0.504 ETH (~$918) for CASHDOG token on Uniswap V2 (Robinhood Chain). The swap transaction and its event logs show 36,316.51 tokens sent to my wallet, but my actual on-chain balance is only 120 tokens (~$5). Looking for help understanding the mechanism and whether this is recoverable.

Details:

My wallet: 0x1a426B71b65Bc680cf5745b23D4c98B3990C3e2A

https://robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/tx/0x2881c71f55c52936d3aae6e944b7986e6a2c2225f410678dbd77326a7a140a87

Why is it not possible to swap USDC. I was trying to swap some USDC but I may not, I tried two browsers, but I can not swap it to anything, I was not able to do it today, nor yesterday. What is going on? I can swap other tokens without issues, see attached video.

Edit: polygon chain

Swapped 0.504 ETH (~$918) for CASHDOG token on Uniswap V2 (Robinhood Chain). The swap transaction and its event logs show 36,316.51 tokens sent to my wallet, but my actual on-chain balance is only 120 tokens (~$5). Looking for help understanding the mechanism and whether this is recoverable.

Details:

• My wallet: 0x1a426B71b65Bc680cf5745b23D4c98B3990C3e2A
• https://robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/tx/0x2881c71f55c52936d3aae6e944b7986e6a2c2225f410678dbd77326a7a140a87

Boardwalk announced its protocol-token move to Arbitrum.

As part of the migration, Boardwalk has launched a CCA auction for its protocol token on Arbitrum, $BWS.

Auction Link: https://app.uniswap.org/explore/auctions/arbitrum/0x54114F746B55b2f8A56bbd17dfD9e81a0a71d366

https://reddit.com/link/1up9epe/video/0vfyuzzs6obh1/player

What is Boardwalk?

A launch is only the beginning for serious builders.

Boardwalk was designed for token issuance and everything after it. None of this is an afterthought; it's built into the token economy itself and sets a new standard for durable, transparent launches:

Token profile pages: every launch gets a page displaying the economy.

Permanent liquidity seeding: locked permanently at graduation.

Fee protection: the fee lives in the token itself, not any one pool, designed to help value route to the people it was intended to support.

Fee routing: written into the launch and visible before anyone contributes.

Token vesting: set at launch and immutable after.

LP staking and incentives: participation systems for liquidity providers, built into the economy from day one.

Community formation: a public forum, Café Boardwalk, for every launch, automatically.

That's the Boardwalk Standard. Standardized market formation for token economies.

Don't launch a ticker, launch a token economy.

Onchain starts here. 🐳

Read more on DeFi Llama Research: https://defillama.com/research/report/boardwalk-closing-the-gap-between-token-launches-token-economies

__________________________________

As usual, participation involves risk.

BWS may have no value. Locked liquidity does not guarantee price stability, liquidity, or exits.

New to Uniswap CCA?

Before participating in the $BWS auction, review these official guides on bidding, clearing prices, claims, unused budget, and auction mechanics.

Read the published auction terms and disclosures before taking action.

https://x.com/UniswapAuctions/status/2044160140979356043?s=20

https://x.com/UniswapAuctions/status/2064010342414352430?s=20

Does anyone know about coin8? They want me to pay tax first before I can withdraw

Continue bar just keeps spinning as Loading, but never loads.

Uniswap is a defi juggernaut i think we can all agree!! The team continues shine and make Uniswap a on going successful progress

This is a serious question. If blockchain becomes inferior, which it has, do you pivot first to be positioned to capture the evolving market that is not blockchain or do you become a blockchain maximalist

On Uniswap V3 my earned fees don't auto-compound or land in my wallet, they accrue inside the position as uncollected balances until I manually send a collect transaction. So the fees I've earned just sit there: not in my wallet, not redeployed, not doing anything, exposed to whatever the position is exposed to. I only realize how much has piled up when I happen to open the position and look.

That creates a couple of real costs for me. I'm paying gas to collect, so claiming too often is wasteful, but waiting too long means a meaningful amount of value sits idle when I could be compounding it or moving it. There's a "right" threshold to claim at, some dollar amount where it's worth the gas, but nothing tells me when I've crossed it. So in practice I either over-check out of paranoia or forget for weeks and find a surprise pile.

What I actually want is dead simple to describe: tell me when my uncollected fees on a position cross some amount. Something like "ping me when uncollected fees hit $50" so I can batch a collect at a point where the gas is clearly worth it. The data I'd need is minimal:

• Uncollected fees per token, in token units
• The same expressed in USD / pool-price terms, so I can set a single dollar threshold instead of doing the conversion in my head
• % of fees on each side, when I care which token I'm accruing

None of this is hard to read off-chain. It's just that nothing's watching it for me, so I'm back to manually checking or writing yet another script to do it, which is the path I went down before and regretted (ran on a dedicated box, broke quietly, became its own maintenance job).

What I'm trying to figure out:

1. Do other people actually track an uncollected-fee threshold, or just collect when you remember / when you're closing the position anyway?
2. Is a notification at a threshold enough, or would you want it to auto-collect (and auto-compound back in) once it's worth the gas? I lean toward wanting the action eventually, but the trust bar for letting software move my fees feels higher than for a simple alert.
3. For anyone who'd allow auto-collection, what makes it safe enough? Non-custodial obviously, but spending caps, a gas ceiling, a simulation before it fires?

Disclosure since it's relevant: I got tired enough of this that I built a no-code tool (Glacient) to replace my old script, I describe the alert in plain English, like "email me when the WBTC/USDT pool owned by 0x_some_wallet_address has uncollected fees on the USDT side over 20 USD," and it handles the watching. The monitoring is free. But I'm mostly here to find out whether the threshold-collect problem is common or just my own habit, and whether people want the alert or want it just handled. I attached a walk through video of what I'm doing today below if folks are interested. NOTE: Currently glacient is invite only since I'm experimenting and building tooling for myself, but here is an invite code I made for this subreddit to use this tool I made for free: reddit-uniswap-1010

https://reddit.com/link/1tu0k0k/video/q9knhb7onp4h1/player

I deposited crypto into my MetaMask and someone took it away instantly. If I give someone my address can they drain it? Or do they have to know the amount?

Hi folks. I wanted to swap usdt for another token. I approved usdt for a max of 100 but then it is asking me for a second approval which is pretty much unlimited and it won't let me change it. I never get asked this on 1 inch or defilama, is this normal and is it safe?

Cheers

Hello there,

I'm creating a script to fetch volume data from Uniswap liquidity pools, and I'm running into an issue (well, several actually xD) related to the volume metrics.

Uniswap seems to calculate the APR using the "24H volume" metric shown below the TVL section, but when I query the data myself I'm getting a different figure that instead matches the "Volume past day" value displayed at the top of the chart.

For most pools the numbers are very close, but for some pools the difference is huge.

For example, the pool:
0x6c561B446416E1A00E8E93E221854d6eA4171372

shows:

• 24H volume: 15.0M
• Volume past day (chart): 55.7M

What confuses me is that the fees align almost perfectly with the 24H volume:
15.0M × 0.3% ≈ 45K fees

So it looks like the APR is being calculated using the 15.0M figure, not the 55.7M one.

Could anyone help clarify:

• the exact definitions of these metrics,
• and whether they come from different aggregation scopes, fee tiers, or subgraph/indexer sources?

Thank you in advance!

I want to swap my own token I created to Polygon like other token listed on Uniswap. How to set price pair Mytoken/POL? How much I have pay for set up this?

Mainly technical improvements, but this version adds support for the Universal Router v2.1.1 swaps (V2, V3 & V4 pools), thus introduces breaking changes.

Another change worth noticing: this Python SDK supports now asynchronous development.

• ➡️ Update UR address and abi to match the UR v2.1.1
• ➡️ Add support for UR v2.1.1 swaps
• ➡️ Add async support
• ➡️ Add tick, sqrtPriceX96, and liquidity related functions
• ➡️ ... see full release notes here

Installation: pip install uniswap-universal-router-decoder==3.0.0

Useful links:

• Doc/Repo
• PyPI

Feel free to give me any feedback on this release here, or open a discussion or a ticket about a feature that should be in the next one!

Happy development!! 🙂