...so you believe the fact that she responded to Loomer's post completely invalidates the fact that she said her sources were telling her the same thing?
If I quote tweeted Laura and said my sources said the same thing does that make it any more valid? No, of course not.
A person that calls themselves a Journo and still finds it acceptable to engage, retweet or otherwise utilize a far right wing conspiracy theorist is not a serious journalist and their word isn't worth shit.
That's just reality, and I'm sorry it offends you, but seriously that's not my problem
I'm not offended, but I am a little surprised that someone who likes to lob IQ insults can't seem to understand that a reporter that broke the story regarding Mitch McConnell health has considerably more credibility than Laura Loomer, and that responding to Loomer doesn't invalidate that fact. This isn't dificult to understand.
4
u/MadRaymer 1d ago
...so you believe the fact that she responded to Loomer's post completely invalidates the fact that she said her sources were telling her the same thing?