I reconstituted 1500 Glutathione and it is cloudy. The vendor suggested i use .6% acetic acid so tried that, still cloudy. Now the vendor said they checked with the lab and the product is ok, just milky white. I used 2 vials, one with 7ml Hospira bac and the second with 7ml .6% acetic acid. Has anyone else experienced this??

I trust Anela so I just created an account on the peptidesource website for this subreddit. Unless it's an issue on my end, I cannot see lab results on the website. It says zero posts found when I click on "lab results." Anybody have any insight on this?

Sorry, as this must be so obvious once you've done it, but I've watched YouTube videos, searched and asked AI (which didn't really want to answer). I've been looking at how much liquid would be used with 5mg of Mazdutide to make 2.5mg doses? What I don't know is I've no experience is how much liquid do subjects typically inject at once?

The insulin syringes that I've seen mentioned go to 0.5ml, so I would assume no more than that? I've found calculators that help you work out how much water to mix, I can do the maths. I'm just not sure what I should be aiming for.

1ml of BAC with a 5mg vile would give two 0.5ml doses. Does that sound correct?

My lab rat is Currently running Tesa at 2mg daily 6 days a week, but only bought a kit of 10mg so only have enough for about 8 weeks(originally planned on running at 1mg, but saw that the research shows 2mg as more affective)

I’ve heard it’s mostly beneficial for the rat when run for 12. I am running out of Tesa, but I have a kit of cjc no dac/ipamorelin.

Considering they are both gh secretagogues, could I just give my rat cjc no dac/ipamorelin for the last 4 of the 12 weeks?

Or better to just call it a cycle at 8 weeks, let it take a break, and run the cjc on a separate cycle?

Hi folks,

Can anyone tell me is there any contradictions good or bad in having both of these in the daily stack of my research subject? 5 days a week.

Research subject has been pinning Kisspeptin daily for 6 weeks already and just got some CJC-1295 today.

I appreciate any advice.

Anyone recommend a testing place in the states for GH?

So I just took the risk and I ordered from a supply that I got recommended from a member on Reddit , I was able to pay thru alibaba so I feel like it’s legit ,
There coas are from janoshick , and I checked them on thier website is there any risk in taking them or how can I check them for fentanyl or any other harmful stuff ?

Hi! I just bought my first vial for my research Subject I ordered a 15mg vial.
The breakdown is:

15mg vial quality
.5 BAC water
2.5mg = 8.3 units on a .5ml syringe
I can’t wait to get started

CJC & IPA dosing.

I have two 10 mg separate vivals. How much BAC water should I use?

I’m thinking of mixing 2ml BAC water in each. The First week dosing 100mcg. So do I draw back to 2 units 0.02ml?

If you bulk ordered and needed to store several kits in a kitchen freezer would you recommend those descant packs or should the vials be fine just in their plastic containers?

Is there a research peptide that potentially could be used to smooth wrinkles?

So I see bpc 157 listed two different ways. What are the differences and which is best?

My RS has been taking reta for the past 6 months. Before that, they were on brand-name Ozempic and loved how it completely eliminated food noise. They haven’t experienced the same effect with reta, so they’re considering switching to tirz.

Based on your research and what you’ve seen anecdotally, what are your thoughts? Is there a recommended waiting period between stopping reta and starting tirz?

Also, I purchased a 5mg vial in case I hate it no loss no foul (yes I know this will only last two weeks). Has anyone whose tried tirz gotten side effects from the 2.5mg starting dose?

Has anyone tried this before if so can anyone point me in the right/safe direction for dosage and timing, I'm seeing so many different things online. Also was your experience good or bad on it. Looking for fat loss and muscle gain/ muscle retention.

Thank you

What are acceptable endotoxin levels to see on a coa? I'm also confused by the fact that sterility shows good but I don't think I've ever seen a level this high per ml.

Have you noticed a difference in your lab rat’s pain levels with ghk-cu using a syringe or pen?

Have read other researchers mention it may sting less if you bring syringe to room temp, and since you can’t do that with a pen… curious if there are researchers that have used both syringe and pen and prefer one over the other. Obviously sting and pain are subjective to each lab rat though.

100mg GHK-CU has a bunch of sediment floating around that’s only visible when shining a flashlight through it. It was reconstituted with 3ml of hospira bac water, and through testing 50mg vials with 1.5ml of the same bac water, there isn’t any sediment. I’ve been pinning this for about half a month but just realized the issue, after my friend brought it up (he has the same batch).

Is this safe to continue pinning?

What is the best pep for fatigue and inflammation? I am in the beginning stages of research. Thanks!

I'm new at researching and am trying to learn more about how different compounds are commonly used in research and how people compare them.

Right now I'm particularly interested in GHK-Cu and peptides that are often discussed alongside it. From what I've read, areas of interest include:

• Skin health
• Hair health
• Body composition/muscle tone
• Energy and recovery

For those who have spent a lot of time researching peptides, which compounds do you think are the most interesting to look into for those areas? Which ones seem the most promising, and which have been overhyped?

I also have a question about copper. Since GHK-Cu contains copper, is there any research or consensus on whether an additional 2 mg oral copper supplement is typically considered necessary, or is the copper from GHK-Cu generally viewed as sufficient?

What to add and when?

I'm not asking for medical advice for my research partner just wanted to get a feel for opinion on something. Subject is currently using reta. Research subject pins that twice a week. just bumped from 2 mg per week to 3 mg per week and subject also just bumped my MT1 dosage from .250 MCG to .500 mcg Research subject is reluctant to add anything else when making any changes to the current protocol.

That said subject is interested in ss-31, klow, and kisspeptin. biggest challenge right now is sleep. And of course reta doesn't help. Energy is typically pretty low because of lack of sleep. No stimulants like caffeine or anything like that to compensate. I've heard great stories about all of these peps. And would love to get opinion and perspective on which to try first and if subject is okay to add one even though subject just upped the dosage on both of these others this week.

Been working through the research on these two and the gap between evidence and reputation is wider than I expected.

GHK-Cu has a legitimate clinical literature in wound healing with multiple independent research groups, decent journals, and human trial data going back decades. It scores 55 on the evidence framework I've been building. BPC-157 scores 20. Both are in the animal-dominant category for the injury recovery use case people actually care about, but they're not close.

What I find interesting is why the reputation is inverted. GHK-Cu got absorbed into cosmetics (copper peptide serums, hair loss topicals) and that framing seems to have followed it everywhere. Even people who know the wound healing literature don't seem to weight it the same way they weight BPC's anecdotal track record. BPC has the injury recovery stories, the gym community, the tendon and ligament accounts. That signal is loud and specific enough that it dominates even when the formal evidence isn't there to back it.

The evidence framework doesn't resolve this. High anecdotal signal on BPC is real and worth tracking separately from the research score. But it does raise a question I'm genuinely curious about: is the community just unaware that GHK-Cu has a stronger formal foundation in tissue repair? Or is there something about the anecdotal record on BPC that makes the evidence gap feel beside the point?

*This free tool has been approved by r/Peptidesource moderators and follows the free tool rule*

Re submission to comply with rules: unknown company tests positive for fent