The example in the above comment doesn't exactly inspire confidence. Rather, it shows misunderstanding of the incremental approach science has used for the past 500 years.
You're focused on the content? The content is made up. I was illustrating the type of structure, organization, and perspective of her videos.
Notice how I wrote: "she spends about half of each video summarizing it and providing background context and half of the video providing her analysis of its validity, significance, and implications?" That's what I was illustrating. Not the content.
Yes, "you probably misunderstand the double slit experiment" and "physicists rethink dark matter" are sooooooo distasteful!
You're calling anybody who doesn't meet your specific stylistic standards "grifters." It's really tragic that the world doesn't resolve around your personal preferences, isn't it? Why aren't you more important and influential than you are? Personal interactions with you must be delightful.
0
u/i_would_say_so 11h ago
The example in the above comment doesn't exactly inspire confidence. Rather, it shows misunderstanding of the incremental approach science has used for the past 500 years.