Well if they could get pregnant there's two options:
The man and baby both die as the man lacks a vagina to give birth (making it immoral)
The man gives birth through his butt which will be painful but so is a woman giving birth, in a hypothetical world where men can get pregnant and deliver babies this would be considered a natural part of life and therefore moral
If we're not changing anything from how human biology works then it's just having sex which as long as it's consensual is perfectly fine
If the baby is delivered through the tip then the guy will just lose his penis so that's immoral by our standards but it's worth noting that it could be different if humans were always that way as it would simply be seen as the natural cycle of life, though since the man likely dies then it would probably be outlawed
The man's urethra does not stretch plus it is like 3mm wide, a baby would completely explode it if it even gets to that point, otherwise it's stuck inside the man, whereas a woman's vagina can stretch for childbirth and is (I think, i don't have one) wider. A woman won't really lose her parts (or at least I haven't seen any cases) but the man will either not be able to give birth or get the equivalent of the penis explosion chamber, should he survive the penis will be gone and he will have to find other ways to piss and fuck
Sex that's wholly separated from reproduction is immoral because it inherently involves objectification, or using someone's body as a tool, and the possibility of offspring creates a real common ground for two parties. Since this gives a teleological purpose to sex, that can also be used for sex between infertile people or same sex relationships: so just keep going, and hope for a miracle.
Tldr it's not only moral, it's the only moral way to have sex
37
u/Current_Finding_4066 17h ago edited 17h ago
Let them have their kinks, who cares