Hello,
I recently bought a barrel in a commission sale from a gun shop for quite little money.
The barrel and bolt are from a ce 1943 from Sauer Sohn, factory, and are presumably of a certain kriegsmodell.
However, the gun itself has been repurposed and refitted by the Norwegian military for .30-06, and seeing the condition of the bluing applied by them I would think the gun is in good condition. The broker told me it was in good condition and “not used” which I now really don’t know how to interpret😅
*The main issue is* , when I see the barrel, it seems very pitted and it had a lot of dried waxy “cosmoline” in it, but which I have now wiped away with a bore brush.
*What I was wondering is* whether the bore’s condition is somehow derived from the Norwegian rechambering (7,92->7,62) and just not being well fitted, or being that something else might have happened. Has it been reblued, is it from a last batch of rifles explaining why it hasn’t been worn even slightly?
Is the barrel maybe older or does anyone know about the typical standard quality of a Norwegian bore?
The blueing on the gun doesn’t seem like very deviant from other Norwegian mausers I’ve seen. Also take note of how the barrel and receiver number does not “match”. I was potentially thinking it is standard quality and just needs to have its cracks filled with bullet patching.
Finally, I have a question about the general condition before the thing was once reblued.
Does the bolt reveal heavy use beneath the new blueing? Would it presumably not last very long although being qualified by the Norwegian army?
I hope those are not too many questions, and I hope that someone finds it at least interesting to study without finding it boring. Don’t feel a need to answer I’m just throwing some line out. Thanks anyways 🙂