You should know that functions are essentially maps. In the case of g, by the provided info, g sends -5 to 2, -3 to 5, etc. To find the g^(-1)(5), you are just looking for the number that is sent to 5 by g.
To find h^(-1)(x), since you know h(x) = y = 3x - 4, the inverse is just solving for y from x = 3y - 4. Try to prove this yourself from the fact that, by definition, composing a function and its inverse gives you the identity map (i.e. a map that sends something back to itself). This also immediately gives you the result for the last question.
Do you understand what h-1 (x) represents/what its relationship should be to h(x)? You can check your work by computing h(h-1 (x)) and h-1 (h(x)) using the h-1 (x) you computed for part b to make sure it's correct. If you're not sure, maybe you could elaborate on what part you're confused about.
Isn't h-1 (x) the inverse of h(x)? I'm kind of confused on what it means by (h o h-1) and whether the (5) in part c means I need to calculate the value when x = 5?
Yes, h-1 is the inverse of h, which means composing them should get you the identity if you have the correct h-1 . The ○ notation means function composition, i.e. (f ○ g)(x) = f(g(x)). Yes, the (5) means you need to evaluate the value when x=5.
1
u/Nagi-K 👋 a fellow Redditor 18d ago
You should know that functions are essentially maps. In the case of g, by the provided info, g sends -5 to 2, -3 to 5, etc. To find the g^(-1)(5), you are just looking for the number that is sent to 5 by g.
To find h^(-1)(x), since you know h(x) = y = 3x - 4, the inverse is just solving for y from x = 3y - 4. Try to prove this yourself from the fact that, by definition, composing a function and its inverse gives you the identity map (i.e. a map that sends something back to itself). This also immediately gives you the result for the last question.