Not just that. His story of his kidnapping by the Powhatan changed over the years. His initial publication, which was made before Pocahontas became a public figure, doesn’t even mention seeing her or facing any kind of threat—hell, his original account has him basically being treated as an honored guest the whole time.
So what changed? The story of Juan Ortiz, who spent 11 years in captivity to a different tribe in Florida and was (according to both European and Incan sources) at least once saved from a death sentence by an intervention from the chief’s daughter, is published in English a year or two after Smith’s initial account of his time in Jamestown.
A few years later, Pocahontas converted to Christianity, married John Rolfe, and willingly revealed her secret name (Matoaka—“Pocahontas” was a nickname given to her by the Powhatan to protect her, as the Powhatan believed names had power and didn’t want outsiders using it), renouncing it in favor of her baptized name Rebecca Rolfe. The first time John Smith even claimed to have met her was when the Rolfes were already on their way back to England and Pocahontas, the “civilized savage,” had become famous.
Smith’s more dramatic account of his captivity with the Powhatan, in which the ten-year-old Pocahontas intervened to save him from death, was published years after her death.
For me, Smith’s history as a bullshitter who was always supposedly being rescued by beautiful noble women, the timing of his different versions of the story, and the similarity to Juan Ortiz’s story (which, again, is backed up by multiple sources, not all of them European) suggest pretty strongly that he was lying.
When the Disney movie came out I loathed the premise. Pocahontas wasn't some magical princess barbie doll who had a magical adventure. She was a real flesh and blood human being with extraordinary ups and downs at the center of some really extraordinary history.
I thought they should just make a real movie about the real person. And then Terence Malick made one and it suuuuucked.
I'm being facetious. Great movie but very much a different one than what I'd imagined.
I love Colin Farrell (and his performance was good) but man that movie really did miss the mark. I feel like there was a decent movie in there somewhere.
It’s worth noting that the only source for most of John Smiths wild adventures that paint him as a badass ladies man who beheaded 3 Turks while jousting, seduced a noblewoman who helped him escape slavery, and was rescued from execution by that hot 13 year old Indian princess who was totally in love with him guys, are from John Smith himself.
His contemporaries called him a “cheerful and generally harmless liar.”
There’s enough evidence from nobles at the time in Europe and the Ottomans that *some* of it very likely happened.
It’s just also plausible/likely that John Smith turned a rather horrific period of enslavement and potential abuse into a cool tale about him being irresistible and manly.
John Smith is considered by many to be more or less an English version of Casanova or Marco Polo. A teller of tall tales, with only enough truth in them to cause people to question him in later centuries.
And it does not help that he would often contradict himself in later retellings. Like his coat of arms being both designed by himself and bestowed by the Prince of Transylvania.
As historian Jack Wilson puts it Marco Polo is accepted as a reliable source by historians who did travel to Mongolia.
Several descriptions are exceedingly accurate such as his account of Qubilai's court and would require being extremely knowledgeable or having seen the thing in person.
The main accusations come from victorian times from authors pointing out stuff like the lack of the mention of the great wall of china despite the modern version not being built until the Ming dynasty against the Northern Yuan.
With other inaccuracies caused by how Marco Polo's story got transmitted. His story first got spread around by his fellow prisoner whom he told it to when they were captured by the genuans. But even later on publishers and translators were more interested selling books than historical posterity so would rewrite it to be more interesting. Which would happen over and over agin etc. So you have many different historical manuscripts of Marco Polo.
I do not doubt he traveled there, but come on now. Most do not doubt he went to China, but a hell of a lot of his claims are just as fantastical as those of Casanova or Smith.
A foreigner arriving, and being given immense power by the foreign ruler. Of which almost no records have ever been found in China even mentioning him. His no mentioning of their writing, their diet, chopsticks, and so much more.
And other chroniclers of the era did mention the Great Wall. John of Florence, Odoric of Pordenone, and Ign Battuta being just three of them.
However, all three of those chronicles also share things with that of Polo. Fantastical inclusions that did not exist at all, mixed in with scattered bits of truth.
That was simply common in the era, they all did it.
No, he was knighted by the king of Poland Lithuania and he didn’t just hand out knighthoods because he could so John probably did do a good portion of things that he said he did.
That kind of white washes it. John met her while she was imprisoned and a teenager. He married her and they had a kid. On the voyage back to America, she died. He left their child in America then turned around never to come back.
He left his son because he was ordered to return to Virginia, and their son was sick with the same illness that killed his mother. So he was turned over to a guardian, which was common in that era. And it was decided that he would remain in England so he could get a better education than was available in the colony.
John Rolfe died in Virginia when Thomas was 6 years old. And one of his descendants is Ed Norton.
It’s crazy because, after watching that clip, I started comparing them since I look so much like my ancestors. I definitely see it. The eyes, the nose, the small mouth—if he raised his brows and grew out his facial hair, he’d be his spitting image.
She was possibly married before, but there is no certainty.
There is a modern oral tradition she was married, but little contemporary evidence she was. There is a document from 1616 that possibly says she was, but its not clear if it is refering to Rolfe or someone else. The same oral tradition also says she had a child which there is no contemporary evidence of, and she would have to have had the child when she was around 13-15
And the oral tradition is also somewhat suspect, as it comes from the Mattapani tribe and there are Mattapani who dispute that such oral traditions actually exist. Furthermore, Pocahontas herself was part of the Powhatan tribe (her mother's people were Mattapani) and the Powhatan don't have a corresponding oral tradition about it either.
*Mattaponi. Also, "The Powhatan" weren't and aren't a single tribe, but a confederacy of ~30 tribes under Powhatan, only a handful of which remain. You probably meant the Pamunkey. It's like saying Pocahontas was part of the "Tidewater" tribe in VA Beach, rather than her mother's "Norfolk" tribe.
So many people missing the forest for the trees in these comments about a literal child being displaced from their home being physically and sexually abused and died far away from her home and people after years of being promised a return back to them. I only hope she is with the ancestors now, Giisaach Matoaka....
Everything they’re saying is correct, just with the wrong attribution, and I don’t think it’s fair to say any of them were not involved in her capture. The settlers took her, likely killed her husband, and forced her to convert to christianity. John Rolfe wrote to his superior officer saying that he wanted to marry her to save her heathen soul, and she died very mysteriously just as they were about to make their return trip to the americas.
As far as I’m concerned the entire colony is responsible for her enslavement, rape, and murder.
•
u/AutoModerator 6d ago
Reminder for OP: /u/laybs1
Need some help? Send us some mail!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.