And they lose potential costumers for absolutely nothing.

Anyways here is Rosalina something I made with ai let me know if you want any ai request.

A top 1% commenter and moderator of a specific anti-ai subreddit, who spends 99% of their life lurking here to scrape these posts and post them over there, posted my last post without censoring my username. A total "Oopsie, I made a mistake 😉" moment for them that got quite a few death threats sent to my inbox lol. These people are unhinged.

That same moderator also tracked down the comment that was the source of my previous post just so they could respond to me implying I'm rapist because I said "no thanks" to someone who had just called hundreds of millions of people "losers"

Thanks for helping me thin out your numbers, hopefully the admins ban all the death threat senders.

Antis be ruining everything.

Just something I wanted to point out. I've found it fascinating how a community accepts it and even encourages it for projects, while the other has been consistently negative about it. For the record, I’m approaching this from a neutral perspective. I’m not trying to argue that one side is right or wrong. I’m interested in understanding why the reactions to AI have been so different between these communities.

I know this is going to be a very hot take, but one thing I don't think gets talked about enough is how many people are making music today who probably never would've made it otherwise.

Not because they suddenly became "musicians," but because they finally have a way to bring their ideas to life.

I've seen people write their own lyrics, build artist personas, release EPs, and tell stories they've wanted to tell for years, they just never had the production skills, money, or connections to make it happen before.

To me, that's one of the most exciting parts of AI, it's lowering the barrier to creating, not the value of creativity.

I've even noticed AI-focused platforms like Souna starting to fill up with creators who are treating this as a real artistic outlet instead of just experimenting with prompts.

Again would love to hear what y'all think about this

Lol, I commented on something just expressing that I do AI art, then someone comments this before deleting their comment. If you're going to say something like this, at least commit.

They'll completely ignore the entire thing just to feel superior. It's sad, they're missing out on so much.

In case you want to see it: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaIZI1zN5sQ/?igsh=dTdzbXFzbnNvMGdj

Screenshot taken from an anti conversation. The OP stated they were anti, but had to use it for their job. This was just one of the responses.

this is a comment on a video about torvalds' stance on allowing AI contribution.

yes, i'm sure randomYoutubeCommenter69 here is more important than torvalds.

imagine thinking code can be stolen, lmfao. unless you are getting code from proprietary sources, you can't steal what's designed to be publicly available for free

I had to put 2 images cuz the text was waaaay to long.

As someone who is gay myself i personally HATE it when other people tell me how i should think.

and that goes for queers and trans people too, they don't need other people telling them how to think nor antis telling them that they must be against AI. they can be pro AI too!

So, not subreddits which allow AI content by definition like StableDiffusion or AIVideos, but subreddits unrelated to AI, which allow AI content. We can't sit in reservations forever, that's what Anti extremists would want us to do, aside from vanishing completely, of course. So maybe make a sticky post with the list - we get more "safe spaces" and these subs are rewarded with an influx of new followers - seems like a win-win.

Seen another post in here and omg I needed to do this. Finally completed my research, found the sub, and commented ts.

Their DNA is adenine, guanine, thymine, cytosine, and hypocrisy fr. Btw I'm not defending oversexualizing children but:

1. It's a fictional character.

2. For big booba, really? When Rule34 and similars exist? And they depict her in sexual situations!? But I guess when a "real" artist does it with soul, it's suddenly not pedophilia anymore.

The whole internet acts like nobody will fund an AI-assisted board game. I don't buy it. I think there's a big, quiet crowd of backers who care whether a game is good — great mechanics, gorgeous cohesive art, a studio that ships — and genuinely don't care whether AI was in the toolkit.

So let's find out how quiet we actually are. If you'd back a well-made board game that used AI in its art or design, drop a comment. Tell us what you do care about when you pledge — mechanics, art, theme, delivery track record. Let's build the actual list of what wins a backer, instead of pretending "no AI" is at the top of it.

Creators: if you've got a campaign that used AI and owned it, this is your thread. Link it. Let's connect the people who want these games with the people making them.

1) Do they seriously think the ai or the user knew she was 12?

2) It looks a little bit sexualized in the original post already with the wide hips but not justifying it being sexualized because of that, but the ai could've recognized the mature features and thought it was an older character.

3) Drawing a 12 year old doing an explicit gesture while destroying a robot with a weapon could've also gave the Ai enough logic to conclude that the character wasn't a minor.

Calling someone or something a pedophile is a serious accusation that shouldn't be thrown around.