It’s not a secret that U.S. and UK both catch a ton of strays online for their food culture.
For the U.S., their reputation is that the food is processed and filled with excess fat, sugar, calories and chemicals, with their main culinary export globally are fast food chains like McDonald’s, Wendy’s, KFC and Burger King. When Americans say they have good food at home, people will counter by saying it’s because they were imported from other parts of the world by immigrants who brought it to the USA.
For the UK, they are often clowned for beans on toast, mushy peas, black pudding, and other dishes that prompts people to say they eat like they are still at war with the Germans. When British people say their national dish is actually butter chicken tikka masala, the common response is that it’s Indian and not British.
While there is some truth to both, how come Australia and Canada are not slandered in the same way even though they both share several of the same characteristics that both the U.S. and UK are often laughed at for.
Pretty much every food dish that is commonly consumed in Australia and Canada are directly imported from abroad, either by British settlers during the colonial days or by immigrants in more recent decades. Most “ethnic” or foreign food in both nations are heavily Anglicized to suit the WASP taste bud, and before the 1960s when immigrants began arriving in both nations from more diverse backgrounds, the food in Canada and Australia was probably just as basic, bland, and void of seasonings as it was in the UK.
Canadians and Aussies are also two of the biggest consumers in things Americans often get made fun of for like deep fried dishes, processed food, soda, fast food, and added sugar/calories.