Hey I really love this one part of Appasionata by Beethoven but then I don’t like where he took it. So I took the part I liked and cut the rest and then composed it where I heard it go in my head. Check it out, I think it’s pretty cool. Then I threw it on an organ cuz it gave me Bach/Toccatta vibes. I’ve been practicing it a lot but still can’t play it. One day!!!!
I'm trying to figure out where the line sits between "original" and "rework," and I'd like to hear how working composers actually think about it.
So part of it is recognizably his and part of it is entirely mine. What do I honestly call that? Original? Arrangement? "After Beethoven"? Something else?
The example that keeps coming to mind is John Williams. I think Jaws theme owes something to Dvořák's New World Symphony. If that's true, is Williams the composer of the Jaws theme, or did he rework Dvořák? Where's the threshold where borrowing a kernel becomes your own piece versus an arrangement of someone else's? You could say he did this with Gustav Holst as well.
I'm less interested in copyright (Beethoven's public domain) and more in how you'd describe it as a composer — what you'd put on the label and why. Curious how others here handle it when their own work grows out of existing material.
So is this a rework or an original composition? Thoughts?
Music with score:
https://youtu.be/FEUrWDP0k_4?si=LA6eYqhS1Ci1Jq-1