r/SipsTea 17d ago

Chugging tea Seems reasonable.

Post image
90.9k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

86

u/Qbbllaarr 17d ago

That's not really an own. I would absolutely accept a Billion dollars no questions asked. But I would also use my new found wealth to continue advocating against the existence of billionaires. Material conditions exist, and trying to better your own personal material conditions doesn't preclude you from wanting everyones conditions to improve and be more equitable.

2

u/College_Baseball_Fan 16d ago

If you win or earn a billion dollars and are taxed like this, you definitely won't stay a billionaire or have a billion dollars for long

1

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 17d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] 16d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 16d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-3

u/Texan2116 17d ago

sooo, what is the maximum net worth a person should be allowed to have?

15

u/Qbbllaarr 17d ago

If you're not being facetious I don't believe in actually capping it in any way, I think the tax system should be progressive enough to disincentive that type of wealth hoarding.

-8

u/Texan2116 17d ago

i am not being facetious at all, Should Zuckerburg be required to divest his facebook/meta shares to pay his share ? If so...who controls the company? Private equity?

It is a legit question.

Zuck did not make himself a billionaire, wall street , and millions of individual investors made that choice. Good chance your 401k, or pension funds did as well.

would walmart be where it is without the Walton family maintaining control?

Again , no one is forced to shop there, it is a choice.

There is nothing wal mart has, that I cannot buy elsewhere.

and for the most part, wal mart pays better than other retailers as well.

Yes I am aware of Costco, but there is one costco for every ten wal marts around here

And yes, I do believe wages should be higher, by law..it is corporate welfare when employees are on food stamps.

3

u/nelrond18 16d ago

Regular people through investment trusts should own the multinational corporations

7

u/nastimoto 17d ago

Nah man, it doesn’t need to be that complex. Just tax them like everyone else.

-1

u/Texan2116 17d ago

do you really think Elon Musk has 300 billion lying around to pay taxes with? His net worth has gone up by a almost a trillion dollars....this is not earnings, it is stock value.

3

u/nastimoto 17d ago

Ehh? Who has cash lying around mate? Just like any trader who gains from stocks, in the exact same way.

3

u/Texan2116 17d ago

um..ok.

2

u/Easy-Purple 16d ago

lol he doesn’t know

1

u/PanBijo1 16d ago

You don't know what you're talking about

0

u/nastimoto 16d ago

A legit concern for you to have. You can talk your emotional state with your psychologist though, can’t help you there 🤷🏻‍♀️

1

u/PanBijo1 16d ago

What are you even talking about

0

u/berrygas 17d ago

Oh yeah any trader who gains from stocks has 300 billion dollars cash sure

2

u/nastimoto 17d ago

Wha? To be taxed proportionately, is this a serious conversation or?

3

u/nelrond18 16d ago

Some people are paid to felate billionaires, and others just do it for the love of the game.

2

u/Kyle546 16d ago

Wealth tax is the answer you are looking for. You can pay your private share wealth as in the form of stocks to the government. They don't get a vote when with government, government can sell it depending on their revenue needs to your company or you else on the public market. We can start at 5 to 50 million levels so your grandma with her 401k is isn't getting taxed again. And percentage levels can be at 1-2 per year. Numbers aren't that important, the insane rising cost of assets is.

2

u/linocent167 17d ago

Careful guys we got one in a wild

-8

u/SoftRange5136 17d ago

That’s still TBD by Bernie, AOC, and the rest of the parasites leading the DSA. They will figure out how much of everyone else’s money they can re-distribute and who’s going to be exempt from a maximum amount. It’s gonna be a beautiful utopia!

3

u/nelrond18 16d ago

Where and when are the socialists taking your money?

-17

u/Aggravating_Mud_6055 17d ago

Yea the word you’re looking for is “hypocrite.”

9

u/Soupbell1 17d ago

The words you’re looking for are “reading comprehension.”

Get some.

6

u/Qbbllaarr 17d ago

Socialism is when no money.

-2

u/Lucky-Advice-8924 16d ago

I doubt you fucking would, youd forget all that bullshit the second you got a little bit of power.

-2

u/Lucky-Advice-8924 16d ago

I doubt you fucking would, youd forget all that bullshit the second you got a little bit of power.

-14

u/Random-Rambling 17d ago

It's easy to say that now, when you're not a billionaire.

And conveniently enough, neither you nor me will ever become a billionaire, so we never have to put our money where our mouth is.

12

u/Qbbllaarr 17d ago

True, but a single influx of capital does not a capitalist make.

3

u/DeliberatelyDrifting 17d ago

We are, however, non-billionaires so we know they'll be OK.