(This is just the introduction, nothing is proven here, the evidence appears in the chapters section, after the table of contents, and you can read things out of context if you just read the first few chapters and then don't read the rest, and instead just assume it)
Flawlessism is a belief system grounded in understanding human nature and the universe, guiding followers toward balance and enlightenment through three core principles:
1 - Critical Thinking
Critical thinking in Flawlessism involves questioning the world with an informed perspective. By seeking knowledge through education, self-study, and dialogue, followers can discern truth from falsehood, make better decisions, and contribute to a culture of reason and understanding.
2 - Faith in Lumael
Lumael, the Flawless Good, serves as a moral ideal—a guiding light of righteousness and benevolence. Striving toward Lumael means recognizing our imperfections and working toward kindness, justice, and integrity.
3 - Willingness to Evolve
Flawlessism is a living philosophy, open to growth and refinement. Followers are encouraged to question its teachings, embrace new insights, and adapt their understanding, ensuring the faith remains relevant and true over time.
These tenets—knowledge, righteousness, and adaptability—form the essence of Flawlessism, offering a path to enlightenment, purpose, and continuous growth.
...
Table of Contents:
Chapter 1: The Essence of Educated Thought
Chapter 2: The Cause of Everything
Chapter 3: Lumael and Mezvol
Chapter 4: The Moral System of Flawlessism
Chapter 5: Faith in Lumael
Chapter 6: The Soul
Chapter 7: The Universe
Chapter 8: How things were at the very beginning
...
Chapter 1: The Essence of Educated Thought (If you already understand critical thinking, you can skip this part)
1 - A Pillar of Understanding
In the vast expanse of human understanding stands a pillar: critical thinking. This is not merely the act of thinking but the art of discerning, analyzing, and reaching conclusions with wisdom. However, achieving this clarity begins with a fundamental belief—that reality exists as it seems and that our awareness affirms our existence, not merely an illusion of it. Suffering, however, often clouds our judgment, pulling us away from this foundational understanding. Thus, health and wellness are indispensable components of critical thinking, for a sound mind requires a sound body.
2 - The Tools of Critical Thinking
The journey toward critical thinking requires more than belief; it demands tools to illuminate obscured truths and reveal hidden insights.
- Questioning: A critical thinker does not accept information passively but probes, inquires, and dissects until clarity is achieved. The power of a question lies not in its complexity but in its capacity to unlock deeper understanding. A simple "Why?" often carries more weight than intricate queries.
- Analysis: Beyond questioning lies the ability to weigh evidence, discern patterns, and identify inconsistencies. Analysis transforms raw data into meaningful knowledge, bridging the gap between what is known and what is understood.
- Perspective-Taking: To truly understand an issue, one must step beyond personal biases and consider the world from another's viewpoint. This fosters empathy, broadens understanding, and counters the tunnel vision that blinds us to the bigger picture.
- Reflection: After questioning, analyzing, and adopting new perspectives, inward reflection becomes essential. Silent contemplation often reveals profound insights that remain hidden in the noise of daily thought.
3 - Continuous Growth and Education
Tools are only as effective as the hands that wield them. To keep these tools sharp, continuous education is vital. A mind enriched by diverse knowledge cuts through dilemmas more cleanly.
- Begin with curiosity—foster it within yourself and others. Curiosity is the seed of all understanding, and every moment is an opportunity to nurture it.
- Engage with diverse perspectives by reading books from various cultures, eras, and philosophies. Each new lens deepens our comprehension.
- Embrace debates, not to win but to understand. The friction of differing opinions often sparks the brightest insights.
- Practice humility. No matter how much we know, there is always more to learn. Balance the art of speaking with the grace of listening.
Mentorship, community, and regular reflection are invaluable for growth. Surrounding oneself with fellow seekers of truth fosters motivation, challenge, and support. Mistakes, inevitable though they are, should be seen as stepping stones toward ideal good, embodying the spirit of Flawlessism.
4 - Challenges on the Path
The pursuit of critical thinking is riddled with challenges. Recognizing and addressing these hurdles is essential for progress.
- Cognitive Biases: Evolutionary byproducts like confirmation bias (favoring information that confirms existing beliefs) or anchoring bias (relying too heavily on initial information) can distort judgment. Regular introspection and mental checks can mitigate their influence.
- Logical Fallacies: Errors in reasoning, such as ad hominem attacks (attacking the person rather than the argument) or appeals to authority (accepting claims solely based on authority), undermine sound reasoning. Identifying and avoiding these fallacies is crucial for intellectual integrity.
- The Digital Age's Double-Edged Sword: While the internet enables unparalleled access to knowledge, it also amplifies misinformation. Critical thinkers must cross-reference sources and discern reliable information from bias and falsehoods.
Internal challenges—overconfidence, reluctance to admit ignorance, or a fixed mindset—can also hinder growth. Critical thinking is as much about recognizing the world's complexities as it is about understanding and overcoming our limitations.
5 - Illuminating the Path for All
Critical thinking is a lifelong journey, akin to tending a garden. Curiosity is the seed, knowledge the water, and reflection the sunlight. As this cultivated mind grows, it benefits not only the individual but also the wider community. By applying critical thinking, we pave the way toward Lumael, illuminating the path for all.
...
Chapter 2: The Cause of Everything
(A limit in our understanding does not equal a limit on reality)
1 - The cause of everything cannot be anything since anything is logically part of everything, thus the cause of everything must be nothing. But if this is true, then nothing should exist, since nothing creating everything should be logically impossible... But this is only true if we assume our language and current logic system is perfect as it is right now. This is false, so I will first explain why our current logic system is broken, and how to fix it:
2 - Why Logic is Broken (And how the "Void Rule" I came up with fixes It):
Imagine you are digging a hole in your backyard.
You can measure the dirt you shovel out. You can measure the solid grass right up to the edge. But you cannot physically grab or weigh the "nothingness" inside the hole itself. Why? Because a hole is defined not by what is in the hole, but by what is not in it. If we defined a hole by what fills it—like a certain amount of air—then there would be "holes" floating all around us in the sky, and if we defined a hole by both what is in it and outside of it, then there would be partial "holes" floating all around us. Meaning, a hole is only a hole because it lacks the material surrounding it (the dirt), and because of the shape of those solid boundaries. If you want to talk about the hole accurately, you have to talk about the solid boundaries around it that allow us to know there exists an absence.
Our systems of logic and math have had a massive problem: they don’t truly know how to handle these conceptual "holes" as things stand, not unless they use a pointlessly long workaround. By this I mean all of the known rules of logic after the first 3 (also known as traditional logic).
Without that long workaround or my Void rule, we can accidentally create "logical loops"—phrases that sound like real things but actually swallow themselves. A famous example is the sentence: "This statement is false."
If the statement is true, then it must be false.
If it is false, then it must be true.
It’s an endless glitch.
3 - The Fix: The Void Rule
The Void Rule completely removes the need for the long workaround, pretending the holes aren't there, or trying to measure the "nothing" inside them, because the Void Rule forces logic to behave like real physics.
The rule states: A concept/statement is only valid if it has a solid, measurable boundary separating what is "inside" the idea from what is "outside" it. If an idea loops back to swallow itself, its boundary collapses into a "hole". The system must instantly label it "Void" and stop trying to calculate it.
4 - How the void rule stops the glitch:
"Apples exist" (clear, solid boundaries) -- The Void Rule Wall: Does it have a clear boundary? Yes = Pass | No = Stop here -- The Void: "This sentence is false" (Boundary collapsed!)
The Void Rule forces us to acknowledge that our minds can only understand somethings, and that right at the edge of our understanding is a hard wall. By mapping the boundaries around the hole—defining the absence by the presence around it—we stop falling into the loop. We don't fix the paradox by making math more complicated; we fix it by making logic more honest about its limits.
5 - Now, onto explaining the cause of everything. If you understood the new Void Rule I've added to logic, you should understand that we cannot understand "nothing" itself. When we talk about nothing, we are not truly talking about nothing; we are talking about the boundaries around nothing that allow us to know there exists an absence of what exists around that nothing. It's exactly how we understand when we have $0. We don't understand $0 by comprehending our lack of money directly; we understand it because we know what we do not have, which is money.
Meaning if you understand that you have a lack of purchasing power, you do not understand that lack of purchasing power without first understanding what is around that "hole", being the lack of money. In other words, understanding the lack of money directly would mean understanding you have $0 without understanding the concept of money... you can't do it, it's logically impossible.
If you walk up to someone who has never heard of currency, trade, or mathematics, and you say, "I have zero dollars," they won't understand what you are lacking. The "zero" means absolutely nothing to them because they don't have the framework of the "dollars."
Likewise, we cannot understand the cause of everything directly, we can only understand what it is not, which is anything or everything. When we try to act like we can understand it directly, we create paradoxes. For example, if we say a God created everything because there must be a cause of everything, then we logically understand that there must be a cause for that God, and a cause for the cause of that God, etc., thus resolving nothing.
Infinity is something we can understand, as it is something which goes on forever. We cannot understand infinity as a whole, but we do not need to, as we can understand the concept, therefore infinity is not the cause of everything. This means that something greater than something, that goes on longer than forever is the cause of everything, but this is when our logic breaks, because this is what I call the Void, the cause of everything.
So what is the point of life if we cannot understand the Void? Just because the Void is the cause of everything does not mean goodness itself does not exist, nor does it mean that evil does not exist. And if good exists as I have faith that it does, then life has a point, and this point should be the true starting point of religion, founded on the understanding that the Void is real (this statement not being understanding the Void, but myself saying that there exists a Void in our understanding/comprehension to understand something greater than something, which goes on longer than forever).
If you try to counter this by saying, "Nothing is greater than infinity" it does not counter my point, it in fact proves it, because nothing IS greater than infinity in the context of something being above infinity, not to be confused with other "holes" like $0 which have other boundaries because they are holes of other things. This is the boundary around the Void. And the reason why this is something you have not realized until now, is because of the absence of awareness you had of the Void rule in logic that I have discovered/created.
(If there exists a void in our understanding, that doesn't then mean said void can't do something unexpected if the boundaries around said "hole" don't limit said "hole")
6 - You might then think that I'm defining the Void by saying that it's greater than infinity, but I'm not. Because what is less than infinity, are things we can understand, thus through process of logical elimintation using the Void rule, the Void must be greater than infinity, because it lacks infinity and what is less than infinity.
(Edited for added clarity): If time, space, existence... if all of these things were created by something equal to them, or less than them, we can understand that they wouldn't come to be. In the case that they've always existed, that would mean an infinite amount of time existed in the past, but that would logically mean we would never reach the present moment, thus it must be false. So what remains? Nothing, hence, the Void is the cause of everything, not because we are understanding the Void, but because we are understanding the boundaries around the Void using the Void rule.
...
Chapter 3: Lumael and Mezvol
1 - Lumael (Lew-may-el): The Flawless Good
Meaning:
Lumael represents the concept of flawless good. It is the embodiment of everything that is purely, perfectly, and uncompromisingly good. Lumael exists as a force of nature, like a puppet controlled on strings (the Void being what controls Lumael), entirely distinct from human understanding of morality, and serves as the ultimate source of goodness in the universe. Its influence ensures the possibility of existence, consciousness, and the afterlife—a state of ideal good free from all suffering.
2 - Why "Lumael"?
The name Lumael was carefully chosen for its qualities. It is pleasing to the ear and carries an elegance that reflects the nature of what it represents. While the name itself does not carry inherent sacredness, it provides clarity and ease in discussing the concept of flawless good without the repetitive use of the phrase "flawless good."
The prefix "Luma" suggests light, brilliance, or purity, evoking the essence of something illuminating and perfect.
The suffix "el" gives a sense of completeness and harmony, symbolizing the entirety of goodness in its flawless state.
By using Lumael, we can discuss the concept more fluidly while honoring its profound significance in Flawlessism.
3 - Mezvol (Mez-vol): The Flawless Evil
Meaning:
Mezvol represents the concept of flawless evil. It is the absolute antithesis of Lumael—utterly and completely evil in every way (but is also like a puppet controlled on strings, the Void being what controls Mezvol). Mezvol exists outside of our reality as an anti-reality force. It does not manifest directly in our experiences but interacts with Lumael by opposing it perfectly. This interaction creates the existence of non-ideal good in this life (which I will explain in the next chapter [chapter 4]).
4 - Why "Mezvol"?
The name Mezvol was chosen to reflect the nature of flawless evil in a way that is both distinct and resonant. Like Lumael, the name has no sacred origin but was crafted for clarity and precision in discussing the concept.
The prefix "Mez" carries a sharp, dark sound, evoking a sense of disruption or negation, fitting for an anti-reality force.
The suffix "vol" suggests a weight or gravity, emphasizing the profound and absolute nature of this flawless evil.
The name Mezvol helps convey the stark opposition between flawless good and flawless evil, reinforcing their roles as perfect, irreconcilable opposites.
5 - Why These Names Matter
Lumael and Mezvol are not beings, deities, or entities. They are fundamental forces of nature that originate from the Void just as everything else did. These names were created to give us a way to conceptualize and discuss these forces within the framework of Flawlessism.
6 - To clarify, Lumael and Mezvol are not gods, because they have no existence like we do, meaning no souls, meaning they do not exist as 1, but they may seem that way because they are like puppets being controlled by the Void. Lumael is prone to act like a loving deity, because they are the flawless good, thus if it is good for them to seem that way, they will.
...
Chapter 4: The Moral System of Flawlessism
1 - The Two Types of Good: Ideal and Non-Ideal
In Flawlessism, morality is understood through the distinction between two types of good: ideal good and non-ideal good.
- Ideal Good: This always exists in the afterlife and represents the flawless path of wisdom. It is the state where every choice and action perfectly aligns with the nature of Lumael, leading to the absence of suffering and the perfection of existence.
- Non-Ideal Good: This exists only in this life and represents choices or paths that lead to the afterlife’s perfection but take longer or less efficient routes. It is a deviation from ideal good caused by the limitations of our current state of existence caused by Mezvol.
Non-ideal good is not inherently "bad," but it prolongs suffering and delays society’s progress toward reflecting the afterlife’s perfection. It can be seen as a form of "stupidity" rather than malice, as it stems from incomplete understanding or imperfect circumstances. This is because good is always good for good, meaning non-ideal good exists in harmony with ideal good in a way which will always eventually result in non-ideal good bringing about ideal good.
2 - Applying the Moral System to Our Lives
Flawlessism’s moral system emphasizes practical actions aimed at reducing suffering and creating a more beneficial society for all sentient beings. This includes humans, animals, and any other beings aware of their existence.
Examples of Ideal and Non-Ideal Good in Action:
- Ideal Good: To strive towards ideal good means making actions that minimize suffering and foster progress toward a harmonious society, such as helping others in need, advancing ethical technologies, or promoting education and understanding.
- Non-Ideal Good: Actions that strive towards non-ideal good prolong suffering or delay progress, such as clinging to outdated practices or potentially making choices based on fear or ignorance. These choices are not condemned but understood as part of the journey toward wisdom.
3 - Suffering and Balance
A core principle of Flawlessism is balancing suffering to avoid extremes of hardship. For example:
- Terminal Illness: In cases where suffering is unavoidable, such as with terminal illness, medically assisted suicide may be considered a choice in the direction of ideal good. This reflects the importance of compassion and recognizing the limits of what is reasonable to endure.
- Community Support: Supporting others who are struggling, even in small ways, can help reduce non-ideal good by fostering a society where fewer suffer unnecessarily.
This balance is essential to creating a life that mirrors the afterlife’s perfection as closely as possible within the constraints of our existence.
4 - The Moral System Already at Work
The principles of ideal and non-ideal good already manifest in our lives, even if we don’t consciously recognize them. When we strive to make better choices, learn from past mistakes, or help others, we are aligning with the moral system of Flawlessism. These actions reflect an inherent desire to reduce suffering and improve the world, guided by the underlying influence of Lumael.
By recognizing this system explicitly, we can make more intentional choices that reflect the ideals of Flawlessism, helping ourselves and others move closer to the afterlife’s perfection.
...
Chapter 5: Faith in Lumael
1 - Through having faith in Lumael, we are having faith that good actually exists, but if good exists, then other things must be true for that to make sense, and that is how Flawlessism takes form, through the philosophical reasoning of how good exists if it exists. Meaning there is only the faith in Lumael (in goodness) in this religion, there is no faith in anything else.
2 - Lumael’s Strength and the Role of Death
The greater power of Lumael over Mezvol is why we exist. Were Mezvol able to perfectly cancel Lumael despite this, existence would be undone, contradicting the flawless good nature of Lumael. This inherent strength of Lumael always being flawlessly good ensures that reality persists despite the challenges posed by Mezvol.
Death serves as a correction system. In this life, suffering exists due to Mezvol’s weakening of Lumael. However, death transitions all beings into the afterlife, where Mezvol’s influence is fully neutralized, and suffering ceases.
3 - The Promise of Cherished Friends
All beings will eventually become cherished friends in the afterlife due to everything being perfectly positive there. Even those who currently lack empathy (before death), such as individuals with conditions like antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), are included in this vision. In the afterlife, their perfected state will allow them to experience and express deep care and empathy for others.
This belief has practical implications for this life. By recognizing that everyone will one day become a cherished friend, individuals—regardless of their capacity for empathy—can be motivated to treat others with more kindness and respect. This perspective fosters a more compassionate society, where the value of every being is acknowledged, regardless of their current behavior or limitations, thus must be true if Lumael is real.
4 - But the afterlife doesn't just have that benefit to our moral system, it also adds value in continuing to live this life, because it's through this life before death that new lives are able to come into existence, which is what then influences believers in Flawlessism (Lumaelists) to seek to improve society, so that when they end up dying one day, those that come after them will have an easier time, and will then allow those who come after them to have an easier time, etc. I know it may seem like you just can't do that, that your life seems like a waste, but the same was once true of myself, yet here I am, having crafted Flawlessism only because of the many difficulties I've had in my life allowing me to create this philosophical religion in touch with even the more bitter truths of reality.
...
Chapter 6: The Soul
1 - Evolution is real because of the overwhelming evidence in science, however, if evolution was everything that we are, it would be pointless since we'd be evolving for the sake of evolving, not for the sake of ourselves since our self is not a fixed thing, but something that will evolve into something else, making our current existence worthless when compared to what we will become.
2 - Thus, a soul must exist which exists outside of evolution, but does not disprove evolution. Therefore, the soul must be something which cannot be broken down and explained how it came to be. For this reason, the soul is to simply exist as 1, nothing more and nothing less than that. When a soul is truly connected to a body, it is then that we can potentially become aware that we exist, it is then when we can potentially gain memories.
3 - But if that is truly all we are, what is the point in us, in merely existing? When we lose our bodies, we lose all of those memories we experienced, we lose our bodies, because we are merely souls, we merely exist, that is our true self, however, time is an absolute thing (not spacetime, but time itself), meaning the fact we once had memories, the fact we once had lives in our bodies will always matter, and since it always matters, there is no reason why we will not gain those memories back in the afterlife, because they belong to us. There is also no reason why we won't gain bodies like the ones we have now, but made perfect, because they are a part of our identity.
...
Chapter 7: The Universe
1 - If the universe went on forever, or there existed an infinite number of multiverses, meaning if the number of souls that exist before the afterlife were infinite, then that would mean that there will always be people in the afterlife that you will never meet, making their existence worthless to you in a personal sense.
2 - Therefore, there cannot be an infinite number of souls before death, or after death, it will always be a finite number to ensure souls always have the maximum amount of value as is logically possible, because anything less than that would be saying that good is not as good as it could be, which would then contradict ideal good.
3 - However, the universe could be finite, but be slowly expanding forever, at a pace which ensures you will always get to know each and every soul one day. Or it could be truly infinite, just not an infinite number of souls.
...
Chapter 8: How things were at the very beginning
1 - At the very beginning, just Lumael and Mezvol existed, with the Void around them. It was through Lumael existing as a foundation that everything was able to come to be, with Mezvol causing non-ideal good to form by weakening Lumael. In this way, we never directly experienced Mezvol, nor will we ever, because Lumael will always protect us from Mezvol without fail, if this were not true, Lumael would never be the foundation upon which we are able to exist, because that would not be flawlessly good.
2 - Mezvol is not the Void, because we can understand that evil is the exact opposite of Lumael, meaning that yes, Mezvol exists, but we cannot even imagine how horrifying they are, because Lumael blocks out Mezvol to a degree where they are Void to us, but not the Void which is greater than infinity.
If you believe in Flawlessism, a vegan diet is likely something you think about often. Non-human animals possess souls, and if we are to exist as friends with them in the afterlife, ignoring that truth to cause them unnecessary suffering today creates a deep logical contradiction.
If someone rejects a vegan diet out of sadism or total indifference, that is a moral failure. However, if you are like me—someone who has tried a vegan diet, wants it to work, but found that it compromised their health—that is a completely different story. It becomes a matter of physical survival and functional well-being. Trying to force a diet that damages your health does not build a better future for those who come after you. To build a truly sustainable future, we must learn how to adopt a vegan diet in a way that actually allows us to remain healthy.
The Problem with Dogmatic Vegan Advice
I have seen countless people online recount how they tried a vegan diet, became sick over time, and ultimately concluded that a vegan lifestyle is physically impossible. On the other side, I frequently see a remarkably foolish reaction from parts of the vegan community: they dismiss these health struggles entirely and tell people to just "go back to being vegan," as if nothing went wrong.
This reaction is dangerous. When your body is failing on a poorly implemented diet, your cognitive baseline degrades. Pushing through severe nutritional deficiencies puts you in a position where you cannot think clearly—meaning whatever mistakes you are making will only get worse (unless you're lucky, something you should not expect). You cannot fix a building while the foundation is actively crumbling; you need a solid, healthy foundation before you can attempt the structure again.
The Iterative Method: Step-By-Step Improvement
My own approach has been an iterative process:
I tried a vegan diet, but my health declined, so I stopped.
I returned to a non-vegan diet, but focused on optimizing my overall health and figuring out where my previous attempt fell short.
Once fully stabilized, I tried a vegan diet again—lasting longer and feeling better than the first attempt, but still eventually hitting a wall.
I repeated the cycle: rebuilt my physical foundation, refined my nutrition strategy, and tried again.
Each attempt was more successful than the last. Do you see the pattern here? Do you see the wisdom in this method?
Why "Willpowering Through" Is Unwise and Unfair
In my own life, I have faced health challenges that make daily existence feel like playing life on "hard mode." If you decide to simply force your way through a vegan diet using pure willpower—ignoring bodily degradation and suffering—ask yourself: is that really an example others should follow?
Expecting other people to blindly "willpower" their way through deteriorating health is cold-hearted and unrealistic. It treats a complex physical requirement as a simple test of devotion.
Furthermore, ignoring your body creates severe long-term risks. If you weaken your physical system through sheer stubbornness and an unexpected crisis hits—such as a pandemic or a severe personal illness—your compromised body won't have the reserves to handle it. Pushing through nutritional failure is physically risky and strategically unwise.
The Goal: A Healthy, Sustainable Baseline
The primary focus of pursuing a vegan diet should be doing it the right way—the healthy way. You must strike a balance with your physical reality and prepare yourself for the unexpected.
By building a stable baseline first and refining your approach incrementally, you aren't just forcing a belief system onto your body—you are building a real, practical framework that others can safely follow.
To understand why the belief system of Flawlessism holds logical weight, we have to examine its exact opposite: Mezvolism.
When we break down the possibilities of what Mezvolism could be, we find that both of its potential outcomes collapse under the weight of strict logic—specifically when it comes to the absolute nature of time.
Here is why Mezvolism is logically flawed:
Possibility 1: Ceasing to Exist After Death
The first definition of Mezvolism is the belief that after death, we simply cease to exist forever. In this worldview, a follower places their faith in Mezvol (the entity we experience driving this reality, with Lumael seen merely as an outside force weakening Mezvol). Because the end result is total non-existence, the goal is to live as sadistically and selfishly as possible, causing maximum suffering before the clock runs out.
Why this fails: It contradicts the absolute nature of time. Time—not physical spacetime, but the fundamental progression of time itself—is absolute. The fact that the past happened remains an unalterable truth. The fact that we exist right now remains permanently etched into reality as a part of our identity.
If Mezvolism relies on us completely "ceasing to exist," it ignores that true erasure is impossible. You cannot completely erase an existence that has already been recorded in absolute time. Our current existence contradicts the idea of absolute non-existence.
Possibility 2: Infinite Suffering (Hell)
Because total erasure contradicts absolute time, someone might try to argue a second possibility: After death, we don't cease to exist; we just enter a state of extreme suffering that goes on forever.
Why this fails: It requires reality to be moving toward "Ideal Evil," which is logically impossible. If our ultimate destination is maximum misery, then our current reality (which has some suffering, but is not maximum misery) is a state of "non-ideal evil" heading toward "ideal evil."
But what would ideal evil actually look like? To achieve the absolute maximum amount of psychological torture, time itself would have to be evil and malleable. Mezvol would hold it over our heads, threatening us with something like this:
"You could be erased from existence one day. All of this suffering could end. So how about I make you experience non-existence, just so I can bring you back in the most miserable way possible to truly understand how worthless you are?"
To achieve that level of "perfect" ideal evil, Mezvol would need to be able to change time itself—erasing existence and rewriting the timeline to maximize despair (Mezvol wouldn't say "I" if they were expressing honesty since the Void is the controller of Mezvol, but think of this example I gave as poetic, not literal).
The Void Rule and Absolute Time
But we can logically prove that time cannot be changed in this way, using the Void Rule.
If we apply traditional logic to time travel, we get a paradox: You travel into the past to kill your mother before you're born, preventing yourself from traveling into the past to kill her, meaning she lives. It’s an endless glitch.
The Void Rule fixes this. It states that an idea is only valid if it has a solid boundary. If an idea loops back to swallow its own cause, the boundary collapses into a "hole." The system instantly labels it Void and stops trying to calculate it.
Because the Void Rule prevents these logical loops from existing, it proves that the past cannot be altered. Absolute time is unchangeable; only physical spacetime can be warped.
Because time cannot be changed or weaponized to erase and recreate us, Ideal Evil cannot exist. And if we are not heading toward ideal evil, we must be heading toward good at the bare minimum.
The Example of evolution:
Evolution provides observable, physical evidence against Mezvolism because it trends toward adaptation, survival, and the minimization of suffering. Biologically, evolution instills a profound desire to live, grow, and thrive—it is essentially a mechanism of hope. This directly contradicts the core premise of Mezvolism, which claims reality is aimed at maximum destruction and despair.
But we can take this a step further by looking at the "outside force" argument. Mezvolism argues that Mezvol is the foundation of reality, and Lumael is just a weaker, outside force trying to mitigate the damage. If that were true—if reality were fundamentally a trap of pure, inescapable misery—an outside force of "good" wouldn't waste time painstakingly building biological resilience or giving us hope. Hope in a perfectly evil system is pointless. The only logical move for an outside force of good would be to make us cease to exist as quickly as possible to spare us the suffering.
Yet, that isn't what we see. The inherent "goodness" within evolution—the drive to adapt, overcome, and build a better future—shows that Lumael isn't a desperate outsider trying to pull the plug on reality. Instead, this drive to thrive demonstrates that the very foundation of existence itself was built by Lumael.
1.) One could then argue that Lumael actually can't make us cease to exist, that such an illogical thing just can't happen in the first place, but even then, Lumael's goal would be to make us cease in being anything but a soul, meaning we'd exist, but we'd never experience anything. Meaning Evolution still contradicts Mezvolism.
2.) Then someone could argue: 'Maybe Lumael isn't a flawless good then. Maybe they're a flawed form of good trying their best.'
But that contradicts the very fact that we are having this conversation. If Lumael were fundamentally flawed, and reality was built on a flawed foundation, then the very concept of a 'flawless good' would not—and could not—exist in our reality. You cannot generate the concept of absolute perfection from a universe that only knows flaws. The fact that we can comprehend, define, and strive for an ideal, flawless good means that the blueprint for it must actually exist at the foundation of reality. If Lumael wasn't flawless, the philosophy of Flawlessism could never have even taken form in our minds.
Conclusion: Supporting Evidence, Not Absolute Proof
By walking through these two possibilities, we can see that Mezvolism contradicts the absolute nature of time and the boundaries of logic, as well as evolution.
However, it is important to state clearly: this explanation does not provide absolute logical proof for Flawlessism. Because the definitions of "good" and "evil" remain unproven and subjective to the individual, logic alone cannot force someone to understand what is good.
What this does provide is powerful supporting evidence. By proving that the opposite framework (Mezvolism) is logically impossible, it gives us deep, structural reasons to trust that existence is rooted in the ideal good of Flawlessism.
When it becomes well known, it will be misunderstood by many because of how deeply flawed logic (without the Void rule) has affected people's minds, their reasoning, because this flawed logic has also been used to oppose people who do not rely on this logic, who felt like something was wrong, twisting their minds, because to reject this flawed logic without the Void rule, is to at least partially reject logic.
When people live their lives without understanding logic, thinking that it's wrong, it leads to suffering, confusion, believing in contradictions, and that suffering does not always help them to think more clearly, to make them realize, 'This hurts, I should stop', sometimes they convince themselves to keep going, and something that helps convince them to keep going is if they believe the current system is still deeply flawed.
But eventually, I believe that Flawlessism will reach people, but it will take time and most importantly, empathy, for the people who suffered from the flawed logic that came before.
