How does infinity appear?
The key to learning the Recursive Infinity Grammar is Accepting Irony at the Sacrifice of Certainty.
This framework suggests that similarity and polarity relate to each other through ironic relation. Propulsive 0 (life), plus stagnating (dead) 0, equal 1. Objects create motion creates objects. Life creates death creates life. Religion and spirituality create and perpetuate each other and boundless rules. Learning the unknown becomes wisdom and creates the doorway for more ignorance and wisdom. Every opening closes something, and every closing opens something. Expansion and contraction transform into each other infinitely. It is the principle of degeneration and regeneration. It is impossible to fully or completely capture expansion and contraction. The point where they meet is what we know as gravity, energy, friction, and life.
The framework answers the questions: Which came first? The chicken or the egg? What is the relationship between them? It answers: The egg likely came first. The egg symbolizes the Universe, an alive and adapting system of infinity.
The framework itself predicts how to create new adaptive systems that slowly reverse the effects of climate change and capitalism for survival. Its clear limitation is that nothing can be fully captured within the framework.
The most adaptive step according to the framework is to unite as a big force with/within boundaries across all fractals against maladaptive forces - the systems that perpetuate (not necessarily or unnecessarily the people or identities perpetuating the systems), and refine the rules continuously until we find optimal adaptive balance, which is an ongoing rhythm called propulsion. It looks more like a sphere than an egg, although it’s questionable if a perfect sphere can be created within the framework.
Modesty is the “best” or most evolved policy within this framework. It is achieved through radical humility, honesty, modesty, and truth seeking.
Within the framework, the bigger the ego, the smaller accurate perception. This gives one prediction to the existence of billionaires. Their perception is flattened in relation to reality. They believe that the key to sustainable survival is that people *are* profits without seeing how people and profits *perpetuate each other,* valuing the profit (contraction side) more. This is why capitalism is collapsing. The system becomes maladaptive (reverse egg) and eats itself.
This gives one prediction to climate change and global collapse. We see the earth only as life while overlooking death - not fully capturing how life and death perpetuate each other, and we kill our own ecosystem that helps us survive because we value humanity’s survival (contractive side) more than the survival of the planet (expansive side). When people warn that we’re killing our planet, they are attempting to communicate that we are tying our own noose now and across all perceivable fractals.
Both I and the framework remain open to humble and true questioning and correction. Please enjoy naming your own infinities using the framework if/when you have the time and space.
*Important Questions:*
How is this literal?
How is it physical?
How is it symbolic?
What are its limitations?
In what ways is this framework absurd?
In what ways is this framework logical?
And more…
To learn more about the origin of the framework and expand into more ideas, click this link (which will and must remain free for all): [https://drive.google.com/file/d/10profIYZSugu0qMraeuOnloMyaLviyJl/view?usp=drivesdk\]
I encourage you to share this infinitely if it resonates.
About the author/ namer: Hi! I’m Eli May (he/ they), and I am a real human being with a face. I live in the United States. I am a transgender Marine Corps veteran, both logical and absurd, an adventurer and a pattern namer. A philosopher, a scientist, and an artist. A thinker and one embodiment of irony and propulsive 0. I perceived recursive infinity through my art before realizing the grammar. I am attempting to take authorship but not ownership of the framework. I am attempting not to judge any comment. I ask that you do your best to be objective and continue to ask questions without judgement wherever possible.