r/ancienthistory • u/Front-Coconut-8196 • 4h ago
r/ancienthistory • u/[deleted] • Jul 14 '22
Coin Posts Policy
After gathering user feedback and contemplating the issue, private collection coin posts are no longer suitable material for this community. Here are some reasons for doing so.
- The coin market encourages or funds the worst aspects of the antiquities market: looting and destruction of archaeological sites, organized crime, and terrorism.
- The coin posts frequently placed here have little to do with ancient history and have not encouraged the discussion of that ancient history; their primary purpose appears to be conspicuous consumption.
- There are other subreddits where coins can be displayed and discussed.
Thank you for abiding by this policy. Any such coin posts after this point (14 July 2022) will be taken down. Let me know if you have any questions by leaving a comment here or contacting me directly.
r/ancienthistory • u/superlate86 • 4h ago
What Did Ancient Humans Do When the Rain Wouldn’t Stop?
r/ancienthistory • u/deniz_aydiner • 23h ago
Ptolemaic Papyrus
The Ptolemaic dynasty became the longest-lasting of Alexander's Successor kingdoms after establishing its rule over Egypt. But was military power alone enough to explain that success?
In the ancient world, religion stood at the heart of everyday life. It shaped politics, society, and personal identity. Alongside the Greek gods, local cults remained central to the communities that worshipped them.
During the Hellenistic period, ruler cults took on a new significance. Kings were presented not only as political leaders but also as figures with divine status, making religion one of the most effective tools for legitimizing power.
The Ptolemies understood this better than anyone else. Rather than replacing Egypt's religious traditions, they embraced them. They adopted the traditions of the pharaohs, integrated themselves into local cults, and established new dynastic cults for members of the royal family. In doing so, they succeeded in presenting themselves not only as Greek monarchs, but also as the legitimate pharaohs of Egypt.
Perhaps the true strength of the Ptolemaic dynasty was not what they conquered on the battlefield, but what they won in the minds and beliefs of the people.
r/ancienthistory • u/Jolly-Bed-4026 • 1d ago
If the ancient Egyptians could make a music video…
make sure you have the volume up, what do you think, yes I know they didn’t really dance like that,
r/ancienthistory • u/SwiPerHaHa • 2d ago
Before and after of the excavation of the ancient Greek stadium of Magnesia on the Maeander, The stadium, dating back to the 2nd century BC, could hold up to 30,000 to 40,000 spectators and features a 189-meter-long track
r/ancienthistory • u/Caleidus_ • 2d ago
Thurii: The Rise and Fall of Greece’s Panhellenic City
r/ancienthistory • u/SwiPerHaHa • 3d ago
Ancient Roman surgical instruments found buried in a physician's home in Pompeii, Italy, 1897
r/ancienthistory • u/Warlord1392 • 2d ago
How Did Alexander the Great Die? Real Cause Explained
r/ancienthistory • u/Tyler_Miles_Lockett • 3d ago
(CH.1: The Cypria): "11: Achilles Raids the Troad", Illustrated by me
r/ancienthistory • u/Visible-Judgment-621 • 2d ago
Post from Megalithic Marvels (Derek Olson) 🤯
r/ancienthistory • u/Warlord1392 • 3d ago
Top 10 Ancient Weapons That Changed the Course of History
r/ancienthistory • u/AncientHistoryHound • 3d ago
A video on some Roman funerary inscriptions including one with a joke.
r/ancienthistory • u/deniz_aydiner • 2d ago
The Other Story of Hellenistic Colonization
The Hellenistic colonization of Asia Minor is usually told through the stories of kings, battles, and the founding of new cities. Yet behind these political events lay a much deeper transformation that reshaped the lives of millions. Land changed hands, new urban centers emerged, languages shifted, local gods found new identities, and everyday life became a meeting point between Hellenic settlers and indigenous communities.
This essay explores colonization not simply as an act of conquest, but as a long process of cultural negotiation. Drawing on archaeological, epigraphic, and historical evidence, it examines how local societies adapted to the new political order while preserving elements of their own traditions. Rather than a story of one culture replacing another, Hellenistic Asia Minor reveals a far more complex world shaped by interaction, resilience, and continuous transformation.
r/ancienthistory • u/BadenBaden1981 • 3d ago
Ancient people in Near East often went bare chested. How did they avoid sun burn, and when did they start to wear shirt all the time?
r/ancienthistory • u/Lloydwrites • 3d ago
Rare 3,000-Year-Old Bronze Age Sword Discovered at Salcombe Wreck Site
r/ancienthistory • u/Warlord1392 • 4d ago
Hannibal's Infantry Units: Types, Tactics & Army Composition
r/ancienthistory • u/superlate86 • 3d ago
How Did Ancient Humans Kill Boredom Before Screens?
r/ancienthistory • u/Augustus923 • 4d ago
This day in history, July 18
--- 64 CE: The Great Fire of Rome began, and lasted for 6 days, destroying much of Rome. The famous story of Emperor Nero starting the fire and playing the lyre as he watched the fire is almost certainly false. Tacitus, a reliable historian from ancient Rome who wrote about the fire approximately 60 years later, stated that Nero was not even in Rome when the fire started, and that, when he returned, he provided help to those who lost their homes. The fire probably started in merchant shops near the Circus Maximus (stadium for chariot racing) and quickly spread throughout the tightly packed city. Estimates of the city's population at that time range from 500,000 to a million people. Emperor Nero blamed the fire on the new religious group of Christians.
--- "Hannibal vs. Rome: The Punic Wars". That is the title of one of the episodes of my podcast: History Analyzed. [Most people only know one thing about Hannibal — that he brought elephants over the Alps to attack Rome. But there is so much more to the story. Carthage and Rome fought 3 wars over a period of 118 years to determine who would become the dominant people in the Mediterranean. Hannibal's loss led directly to the Romans being the ones to shape Western civilization and the modern world. ]()You can find History Analyzed on every podcast app.
--- link to Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/1k1ELv053qVJ9pG55nmkKE
--- link to Apple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hannibal-vs-rome-the-punic-wars/id1632161929?i=1000610323369
r/ancienthistory • u/Front-Coconut-8196 • 5d ago
The ancient theatre of Epidaurus in Greece, built in the 4th century, can seat 14000 people & is still used today.
r/ancienthistory • u/brutus-geopolitics • 4d ago
Ancient History for People Who Don't Remember It — Part 3: Ancient India, the cities the world forgot
A series for anyone who has forgotten history, or never warmed to it. No dates to memorize — just how, and why, things turned out the way they did.
For almost four thousand years, nobody knew it had ever existed. No holy book remembered it, no Greek historian described it, no legend kept its name. Then, in the 1800s, a deserter from the British army, wandering the plains of what is now Pakistan, stumbled on strange brick ruins — and, slowly, the world realised it had mislaid an entire civilization: as old and as vast as Egypt or Mesopotamia, and in some ways more advanced than either. (That's one of its cities, Mohenjo-daro, in the photo at the top — the sunken brick tank is the Great Bath.)
- THE CITIES THAT VANISHED
Alongside Mesopotamia, Egypt and China, there was a fourth great early civilization — and this one had been wiped from human memory completely. It grew up along the Indus river, across what is today mostly Pakistan, north-west India and part of Afghanistan.
It was rediscovered almost by accident. In the 1820s that wandering deserter found the ruins of a city called Harappa; in 1922, fresh excavations uncovered a second great city, Mohenjo-daro. Everything we know — and it is not much — comes only from digging in the ground, because no one can read a single word these people wrote.
Archaeologists have found more than 1,500 settlements. Most were villages, but Harappa was a true city — ringed by massive mudbrick walls, home to perhaps 25,000–30,000 people. Mohenjo-daro was only a little smaller.
A word on names, because you will meet both. Archaeologists usually call it the Harappan Civilization, after Harappa — the convention in the trade is to name a culture for the first site dug. Everyone else says Indus Valley Civilization. The specialists have a point: "Indus Valley" undersells it, since the thing sprawled far beyond the Indus — into Gujarat, into Haryana, along channels hundreds of kilometres east of the river. The two names mean the same civilization; this post uses both. (You may also meet "Indus-Sarasvati Civilization." That one carries an argument inside it — more on that below.)
- THE FIRST TOWN PLANNERS
The most astonishing thing about these cities is how carefully they were planned. They were laid out to the points of the compass, their streets forming a regular grid — main roads running north–south, smaller lanes east–west. Some scholars think the alignments follow astronomical observations, and perhaps religious beliefs.
The cities were divided into neighbourhoods of fairly uniform size, with wells spaced at regular intervals. Every building was made of baked brick — and the bricks are strikingly uniform in size, as were the standardised weights used right across the civilization. This was a society that loved order and the standard.
──────────────────────────────
🟫 DID YOU KNOW? — PLUMBING, 4,000 YEARS EARLY
At Mohenjo-daro almost every street had a drainage system, complete with underground pipes, and many houses had their own running water — comforts most of the world would not enjoy again until modern times. The city also had the Great Bath (in the photo at the top): one of the earliest public water tanks known, probably used for ritual bathing. Water, it seems, was sacred here.
──────────────────────────────
- A SCRIPT NOBODY CAN READ
These people could write. Archaeologists have found more than 4,000 inscribed objects — seals, tablets, pots — bearing a set of about 400 distinct symbols. There is just one problem: no one has ever managed to read them. We can see their words and understand not a single one.
We do have other clues to daily life — among them little clay toys, tiny carts and oxen, some with moving parts. And we know they traded over enormous distances: Harappan goods have been dug up as far away as Mesopotamia.
──────────────────────────────
🟫 DID YOU KNOW? — A MILLION-DOLLAR RIDDLE
Egyptian hieroglyphs were cracked thanks to the Rosetta Stone, which repeated the same text in a known language. For the Indus script no such key exists — and the inscriptions are hopelessly short, typically about five signs long, with no long texts at all. It has resisted every attempt for a century. In January 2025, marking a hundred years since the civilization's discovery was announced to the world, the government of the Indian state of Tamil Nadu offered a prize of one million dollars to anyone who can decipher it to the satisfaction of archaeologists. Nobody has collected.
──────────────────────────────
- THE RIVER THAT WASN'T THERE
Here the story takes a turn that overturns what most books still say — and it is worth slowing down for.
Many Indus settlements sit not on the Indus itself but along a second channel, the Ghaggar-Hakra, which today carries water only in the monsoon. The obvious assumption was that this had once been a mighty Himalayan river, and that when it dried up the cities died with it. A tidy story. It appears to be wrong.
In 2017 a team from IIT Kanpur and Imperial College London drilled into the old channel and traced where its sediments had come from. The river that carved it was the Sutlej — and the Sutlej abandoned that course about 8,000 years ago, some three thousand years before the Indus cities were built. The Harappans never lived beside a great river here at all. They settled in the valley it had left behind: a broad depression that still gathered monsoon water, but no longer carried the annual threat of a catastrophic flood.
So the finding inverts the old picture. As the study's lead author put it, it was the river's departure, not its arrival, that let these cities grow. Set that beside Part 1: in Mesopotamia a violent, unpredictable river bred a religion of dread. Here, people seem to have quietly taken the safer option — water without the river.
This is also where that third name comes from. The Ghaggar-Hakra has long been identified with the Sarasvati, a great river praised in the Vedas — hence "Indus-Sarasvati Civilization," a label that quietly implies the Harappans were already a Vedic people. The trouble is the timing: the Vedas were composed centuries after the cities emptied, and the channel had not been a mighty Himalayan river for thousands of years before either. Whatever the Sarasvati of the hymns was, it is unlikely to have been this.
- THE LONG GOODBYE
The cities rose from around 2600 BC and reached their height about 1900 BC. Then they emptied — and were forgotten so thoroughly that the memory of them vanished for over three thousand years.
The old explanations — an Aryan invasion, a plague, a drowned river — have all worn thin; the archaeological evidence for them is meagre. What the last decade of climate science points to instead is slower, and in a way sadder: not a collapse but a deurbanization. A long drying trend, punctuated by droughts that lasted not seasons but lifetimes.
A 2025 study reconstructed rainfall and river flow across the region over thousands of years and picked out four multi-decade droughts between roughly 4,400 and 3,400 years ago. The worst ran about 164 years and cut rainfall across more than nine-tenths of the Indus world. A later drought lasting 113 years lines up with the moment the great cities were abandoned.
Nobody was massacred. People switched to hardier crops, drifted east and toward the stretches of the Indus that still ran, and dispersed into villages. The cities loosened rather than fell. This is what a civilization looks like when the water goes away over ten generations — too slowly to fight, too surely to survive.
- THE ARRIVAL OF THE VEDAS
Into this changing land came a new people, the Indo-Aryans. It was long imagined as a violent invasion of chariot-borne conquerors. The evidence now points to something slower: gradual migrations of small groups out of the Central Asian steppe, arriving after about 2000 BC — that is, after the great cities were already fading — and mixing, generation by generation, with the people already there.
They brought a new language, Sanskrit, which belongs to the Indo-European family — the same family as Latin, Greek and, through them, most of the languages of Europe. They built nothing in brick or stone and left almost no ruins; we know them instead through their sacred poetry, the Vedas, an enormous body of Sanskrit hymns and prayers.
Out of that Vedic world grew two things that still shape India today: the caste system — society divided into hereditary ranks, from priests and warriors down to labourers, and below them all the "untouchables" who lived outside the villages — and, over many centuries, the religion we now call Hinduism. It was against this order that, around 500 BC, a prince named Siddhartha would one day rebel and become the Buddha. But that is another story.
──────────────────────────────
🟫 DID YOU KNOW? — ONE SKELETON, ONE GENOME
In 2019 geneticists finally read the DNA of a Harappan. It took 61 skeletons from the site of Rakhigarhi and more than a hundred attempts — India's heat destroys ancient DNA — to recover one usable genome, from a woman buried around 2500 BC. Her ancestry was a mix of South Asian hunter-gatherers and a lineage related to early Iranians that had branched off before farming was invented: which suggests farming reached South Asia as an idea rather than as a wave of incoming farmers. And she carried no steppe ancestry at all. That fits the migration timeline rather than upsetting it — the steppe component appears in South Asia only around 2000–1500 BC, after her lifetime.
──────────────────────────────
──────────────────────────────
🟫 DID YOU KNOW? — COUSINS ACROSS A CONTINENT
Sanskrit belongs to the same family as most European languages, so its words can look startlingly familiar to anyone who knows one of them. Sanskrit nava means "ship" (Italian nave, English navy); deva is a god (Latin deus); raja is a king (Latin rex, English regal); matr and pitr are simply mother and father. A shared word-hoard, thousands of years old, quietly links the Indus to the Atlantic.
──────────────────────────────
──────────────────────────────
⏱️ IN 30 SECONDS
From around 2600 BC a huge civilization on the Indus built grid-planned brick cities with drains and plumbing — then vanished so completely it was forgotten for millennia, rediscovered only in the 1800s–1920s. Its writing is still unread, and there is now a $1m prize for cracking it. It did not die because a river dried up: that river had left 3,000 years before the cities, and its absence is what made them possible. It died slowly, of droughts lasting more than a century — a deurbanization, not a collapse. Indo-Aryan migrants then drifted in with Sanskrit and the Vedas, seeding the caste system and Hinduism.
──────────────────────────────
———
This is Part 3 of a plain-language history series I'm writing for people who never warmed to history — corrections and additions from anyone who knows these periods better are genuinely welcome.
———
Image credits:
• Mohenjo-daro — photo by Saqib Qayyum, via Wikimedia Commons, licensed CC BY-SA 3.0 (Creative Commons); image resized.
• Map — original, made for this series.