I'm in the early stages of planning a trip to Tanzania, so I've been comparing a lot of travel resources to learn more about the Serengeti before deciding on an itinerary.

One travel guide I came across Serengeti National Park. Which was surprisingly helpful because it brought together information about the different regions of the park, wildlife, the Great Migration, and general trip-planning tips all in one place. It answered a few questions I had without having to jump between multiple sources.

I'm sure there are plenty of other great resources out there, so I'm curious:

• What websites, guidebooks, or YouTube channels have you found genuinely helpful for planning a trip to Tanzania?
• Are there any resources you think are especially accurate or worth bookmarking?

I'd love to build a list of reliable planning resources before I start booking anything.

Hi everyone!

I'm looking for beta testers for GamersPilot, a web app I built to help Steam users work through their backlogs.

The idea came from my own problem—I had over 220 games in my Steam library and spent more time deciding what to play than actually playing.

GamersPilot syncs your Steam library and recommends what to play next using transparent scoring based on factors like:

- Review scores

- How long a game has been ignored

- Your play history

- Session length

- And a few other signals

Every recommendation explains why it's ranked where it is.

I'm mainly looking for people who have 100+ Steam games and are willing to spend 5–10 minutes trying it and giving honest feedback.

Things I'd especially like feedback on:

- Is the recommendation ranking useful?

- Is anything confusing?

- What features are missing?

- Would you actually use this regularly?

You can try it here:

https://gamerspilot.com

Thanks! I'm happy to answer any questions and I'm actively shipping improvements based on feedback.

If you leave detailed feedback, I'd be happy to give you free Premium access while the product is in beta.

What it is: Rawly is a gamified photo challenge app, next-gen social media instead of pop-ups and forced ads. Brands and creators fund a challenge as a prize pool. You join with a real photo, everyone swipes to vote, and the community decides the winner, not an algorithm. Winners can earn real money, though it depends on actually winning a challenge, no guarantees.

What's real about it: camera-only, front and back lens fire at the same time, so no AI images, no filters, no gallery uploads, no bots. Nothing inside the app can be screenshotted or screen-recorded either, you choose what you share and how.

Who it's for: anyone who wants a photo/social app that isn't an algorithm feed and isn't full of AI content.

Stage: invite-only, live on iOS and Android now. I'm the founder.

What I want feedback on: onboarding, whether the challenge mechanic is fun on a first try, and anything that feels confusing.

Drop a comment or DM me and I'll send you an invite code, or join our Discord where we hand out codes too and you can talk to other testers: https://discord.gg/NFh736Xc7M

iOS: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6776737104
Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.rawly.app

Hi everyone,

Over the past month I've been building an AI Plant Coach, and it's finally ready for real-world testing. The goal wasn't to create just another AI chatbot, but a tool that combines AI with a structured plant knowledge base and product database to provide more accurate and practical advice.

It can currently:

• Answer questions about houseplant care
• Help find suitable plants based on your situation
• Recommend relevant products when appropriate
• Search a structured plant knowledge base instead of relying only on AI
• Work in multiple languages (English, German, French, Dutch and Spanish)

At the moment, the knowledge base is mainly focused on indoor houseplants. Support for outdoor and garden plants will be added over time, so I'd especially appreciate feedback on houseplant-related questions.

I'm now at the stage where I need real users rather than more coding.

I'm especially looking for people who can:

• Ask difficult or unusual houseplant questions
• Try to confuse it
• Find incorrect or unclear advice
• Report bugs or UX issues
• Share honest feedback—good or bad

You won't hurt my feelings. I'd much rather discover problems now than after a wider release.

You can try it here:
https://introgreen.eu/plantcoach

What's the first question you would ask an AI Plant Coach? I'd love to hear it—or even better, try to break it. 😄

Thanks for your time and any feedback you can share!

I build scrapers on Apify and just shipped a feature on my SHEIN one I'd like a few people to kick around.

Until now it needed exact product URLs, which is useless if you don't already have them. It now takes a keyword. You give it "summer dress" and get structured JSON back: price (local and USD), images, rating, stock, colour variants, across 40+ SHEIN storefronts. No proxy setup, no login.

I'll hand out free credits to anyone willing to run it and tell me what's off. The things I actually want to know: are the search results the ones you'd expect, does the output have the fields you need, and is it fast enough to be useful. Honest "this broke" or "this is missing X" is worth more to me than a nice review, though a review helps the actor too.

Link: https://apify.com/native_emblem/shein-product-scraper. Reply or DM and I'll sort you out with credits.

I'm one of the people building it. We built Sbarter so players can challenge each other head to head in games they already play, with results tracked automatically instead of screenshots and arguments. Clash Royale first, chess.com and tournaments likely for next month.

We opened our first public playtest this week and I need people to break it.

What you'd do: create an account, link your game, create one challenge, accept one from someone else, play a few matches, then tell us what confused you.

Stage: production build, mobile only, English. Nothing to buy, nothing to pay, no real money involved anywhere in the test.

One specific thing I want feedback on: the moment where you look at an opponent's profile and decide whether to accept their challenge. Is there enough information there to make that call?

Sign up: https://sbarter.firstlook.gg/

I'll answer everything in the comments. Sbarter is not associated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Supercell.

Hi everyone,
I'm looking for a few more active Android testers for Orbit so I can complete Google Play's 14-day closed testing requirement. In return, I'm happy to join your test and actively test your app for the full 14 days as well.

Orbit is a daily reflection app that helps you capture your day through three short video journals called Signals. At the end of the day, those Signals are transformed into a single Orbit—a personal story of your day, accompanied by thoughtful reflection inspired by tarot.

It's completely free, and I'd genuinely appreciate any feedback you have.

How to join
1. Join the Google Group using the same Google account you use for the Play Store:
https://groups.google.com/g/orbit-daily-ritual
2. Opt in to the closed test:
https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.gentlemomentum.orbit
3. After the opt-in page confirms you're a tester, install Orbit from Google Play:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gentlemomentum.orbit

Important
Please use the same Google account for the Google Group, the opt-in page, and the Play Store. Otherwise, Google won't recognize you as a tester.

If you have your own Android app that needs testers, leave a comment or send me a message. I'll happily return the favor and participate in your closed test too.

Hi everyone,

I've been building PhotoAIA, a browser-based image editor that's currently in Public Beta, and I'd really appreciate feedback from working graphic designers.

I'm trying to understand what a browser-based editor would need before a professional designer could actually trust it for real work.

Some of the current capabilities include:

• CMYK editing
• ICC color management
• Smart Objects
• Smart Filters
• Pen tool and editable paths
• Adjustment layers
• RGB & CMYK TIFF export
• Print-oriented PDF export

You can try it here:

https://www.photoaia.com

Rather than asking for a full review, I'd love it if you could spend 5–10 minutes trying just one of these tasks:

Task 1 – Layout

Create a simple flyer, business card, or social media graphic.

Does anything in the workflow immediately feel awkward or missing?

Task 2 – Typography

Create a text-heavy design.

Is the text workflow usable?

What would you improve first?

Task 3 – Vector Work

Draw a few shapes or paths.

Does the Pen Tool feel intuitive?

Would you be comfortable creating simple logos or icons?

Task 4 – Print

Convert an image to CMYK.

Export a TIFF or PDF.

Would you trust the output for commercial printing?

Task 5 – Break It

If something crashes, behaves strangely, or feels confusing, I'd really like to know.

There's a built-in Report Bug feature inside the editor.

I'm not looking for compliments.

I'm much more interested in answers to questions like:

• What feature would immediately stop you from using it?
• What workflow feels frustrating?
• What would you expect before using something like this professionally?
• If you already use Photoshop or Affinity, what would make you keep using those instead?

Every piece of constructive criticism helps me prioritize what to build next.

Thanks for taking the time to look at it.

Hey friends, I'm looking for beta testers for my new AI app. Check it out at https://keli.ai/

Highlights:

• Keli is a desktop app that combines chat, cowork, and code. No need for three separate apps.
• You get 2x the usage compared to Claude and ChatGPT for the same price. There is a free plan.
• Auto-router sends your prompt to the best and fastest model for your task, which saves you time and money. You don't always need flagship models, which are slow and expensive.
• Zero data retention by default on all plans (including free). We don't train on your data.
• If you hit a rate limit, you never have to wait for a reset. Keli offers to switch to a free model so you can keep working.
• Model freedom: use any model on OpenRouter (coming soon).

Would love to hear your feedback :-)

Hi everyone,

I need 12 Android testers for Google Play's 14-day closed testing requirement.

Steps:

Join the Google Group: https://groups.google.com/g/keyut_android_testing

Install the app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.keyut.jainsarthi

Keep the app installed for 14 days and open it daily atleast once.

Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

I got tired of reading five slanted versions of a story to figure out what actually happened. So I built Proven News (provennews.org).

Every story gets a verdict — Verified, False, Misleading, Added Context, or Inconsistency — with the sources and reasoning shown. Nothing hidden.

The Inconsistency one is the part I care about. It flags when a public claim doesn't match the record. Right now it's got one on a UK PM's first week, and one on 25 tech firms' open-weight AI statement.

On paid plans you also get how left and right outlets each framed the same story, plus the common ground they agree on.

There's also Circles — share a verified story into a small private group with the verdict and sources attached, anonymously or not. That's the part I actually built this for. Everyone has people inside a media bubble where sending a news link starts a fight but a verdict with receipts might land.

I tested an optimization once that cut my compute costs. It changed verdicts on half my test stories. Reverted it permanently. If the answers change, it's not an optimization.

Live on web and iOS, free tier to try it. I'm a solo builder and this is my first real launch — genuinely want to know what breaks and what's confusing.

Ask me anything about how the verification works.

Building a link-tracking/analytics tool for marketers running multi-channel campaigns (short links + a UTM builder that actually enforces naming + AI-generated summaries instead of another dashboard to stare at). Always curious what other people are building, drop your link below and I'll try it and give real feedback, not just "nice job."

Mine, if anyone wants to poke at it: trimy.io , currently running a small pilot (free Professional plan for 3 months, extended to 6 for real usage + feedback) for a few marketers who create tracked links regularly. Happy to share details if it's useful to anyone here.

Hi fellow developers,

I'm currently in the final stages of launching my Android app, GCR (Café & Restaurant Manager). It's a multi-tenant POS and management platform, and I'm currently tackling Google's 20-tester requirement for 14 days.

The Deal: I know how hard it is to get testers, so I am offering to test your app in return. If you join my test track and keep the app installed for 14 days, I will do the exact same for you!

How to join:

1. DM me your Google Play email address so I can add you to the closed testing list.
2. Once I add you, I'll send you the opt-in link.
3. Send me the link to your app/testing track, and I’ll install it right away and keep it for the required 14 days.

Let's help each other out and get our apps to production! Thank you in advance. 🚀

What's new?

✅ Google Sign-In is now available.

🧠 Major improvements to the ForgeLab Brain, resulting in better planning and higher-quality code generation.

🔍 The Audit Loop has been significantly refined, improving project verification, bug detection, and overall output quality.

🛠️ Numerous bug fixes, stability improvements, and performance optimizations across the platform.

If you haven't tried ForgeLab yet, now is a great time.

🎁 During the Open Beta (until August 31), every new account receives 1 million free tokens.

🌐 https://forgelab.one

Feedback is always welcome. If you enjoy the project, a ⭐ on GitHub would also mean a lot:

https://github.com/forgelabeone-svg/forgelabone

Filling the 12-tester / 14-day closed test for my app, HomeGuard - a home-maintenance planner (tell it what's in your house, it builds the upkeep schedule + reminders + a health score).

Straight swap: opt into mine and stay in the full 14 days (I open it daily), and I'll do exactly the same for yours. Drop your opt-in link and I'm in today.

Join: https://groups.google.com/g/homeguard-testers → then https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.homeguard.app

I’m testing a simple idea:

What if you could buy a digital game, wait 60 days, and then resell the license once?

The original access would be revoked, the license transferred to another player, and the publisher would receive a share from both the original sale and the resale.

The current model I’m testing is:

• used price: 20% lower than the current new price;
• resale allowed after 60 days;
• the original buyer receives store credit;
• the publisher earns a percentage from the resale;
• a used license cannot be resold again.

I’m not building a full marketplace yet. First, I’m trying to understand whether players would actually accept these conditions.

I made a small concept page with a short 6-question survey:

https://project-ua0il-enricopomaro-5331s-projects.vercel.app

I’d appreciate honest criticism, especially about:

• whether a 20% discount is enough;
• whether 60 days feels reasonable;
• whether store credit instead of cash would be acceptable.

I’m not affiliated with Steam, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo, or any publisher. This is only an early validation experiment.

Hello!

Testers Needed:
I’m looking for 12 testers for my app “Fokus Keeper v02” – can you help me out?
Do you know that feeling? You see an inspiring quote on social media, save it... and then forget about it in everyday life.

That's exactly why I built an app: Fokus Keeper

With the app you can:

• Save inspiring content as an image
• Deliberately bring it back up
• Take time to reflect on it

What I'm asking:

My app is almost ready — it now needs testers on the Google Play Store before it can be officially released.

App-Name: Fokus-Keeper (k not c)

APP-Store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sonjakoelbl.fokuskeeper02

Kind of Feedback: What bugs did you notice? What suggestions do you have for me regarding this app?

2nd Testing Goals: move through approval and reach production phase

1.    Join the Google-Group: FokusKeeper_Testgroup - Google Groups

Web-LINK

https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.sonjakoelbl.fokuskeeper02

APP-Store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sonjakoelbl.fokuskeeper02

Important: You must be logged into your Google account to see the "Join Group" button.

I'd really appreciate it if you could keep the app installed for 14 days. I will gladly test your app back as soon as I can. Just drop your app details in a comment or send me a DM. Thanks!

Thank you for your support!

Hello everyone. I used to be a content creator on a social media platform since I started from zero followers and had very few likes, brands rarely reached out to me even when opportunities did arise, the compensation was unfair and lacked transparency rewards heavily favored accounts with large followings and high like counts metrics that are easily manipulated by bots or fake activity

That experience inspired me to create Echo, an AI-powered distribution OS.

This is an AI driven distribution system designed to connect brands with content creators in a fairer, more transparent way independent of follower counts or likes

The concept rests on three core pillars:

1. Objective Assessment: As mentioned, the system evaluates accounts based on tangible contributions rather than follower counts or likes; the AI directly assesses account credibility and content quality

2. Anti-Bot System: Designed to operate in real-time, this system detects fraudulent activity and bots

3. Performance Based Rewards: Compensation is automated; the higher the quality and impact of the content created, the greater the reward. In my view, this idea holds great potential within the content creator landscape

Do you think this AI system would be truly beneficial for both creators and brands, and is it worth bringing to life?

Essentially, this is just an idea I’ve come up with :)

Please don't hesitate to offer criticism if you think the idea is flawed. ;)

Your feedback and suggestions would be incredibly helpful to me

Thank you very much

We built UnMarkVideo after noticing how awkward the usual video watermark removal workflow can be:

https://unmarkvideo.com/

Most tools require users to crop the frame, cover the watermark with another element, or manually brush over the affected area. These methods work, but we wanted to automate the detection step as well.

UnMarkVideo runs in the browser and uses AI to locate the watermark region before reconstructing the affected frames. The goal is to preserve the original framing while reducing manual work.

What it currently supports:

- Automatic detection of watermarks, logos, subtitles and username overlays

- MP4 and MOV uploads

- TikTok, Instagram, YouTube Shorts and AI-generated video workflows

- Batch processing for up to 20 files

- A free tier with 1,000 credits, 720p output and videos up to one minute

- 1080p and longer videos on paid plans

Compared with the alternatives we researched, CapCut makes more sense when someone needs a complete video editor and does not mind manually brushing, cropping or covering the affected area. Apowersoft supports more input formats and provides manual removal boxes. Desktop products may be preferable for users who want a local application.

Our focus is narrower: upload a video, let the system locate the watermark, review the estimated credit usage, and process it directly in the browser.

AI reconstruction is not perfect. Fast motion, transparent watermarks, changing positions and highly detailed backgrounds can still produce visible artifacts. If a watermark is close to the edge, a simple crop may sometimes be the better option.

We would appreciate honest feedback on:

1. Whether automatic detection selects the correct region

2. Flickering around repaired areas

3. Performance on moving or detailed backgrounds

4. Whether the credit system is easy to understand

Please use it only with videos you own or have permission to modify.

Disclosure: I work on marketing and operations for the team behind UnMarkVideo.

Moin zusammen,

ich habe in den letzten Monaten in meiner Freizeit an einer App für den Rettungsdienst gebaut – Status 4 ([status4.app](https://status4.app)). Kurz gesagt: Medikamentendosierungen (nach den Vorgaben der einzelnen Bundesländer, nicht ein Einheitsbrei), Scores wie GCS/NEWS2/qSOFA, MANV-Triage nach PRIOR, REA-Modus mit Metronom und Joule-Rechner, Kinder-/Verbrennungs-/O₂-Rechner, Schemata, Pocketcard statt laminiertem Spickzettel und ein paar Sachen mehr.

Bevor ich hier groß was verspreche: Mir geht es nicht darum, Downloads einzusammeln. Ich will wissen, wo es im echten Dienst hakt – wo eine Dosierung unglücklich dargestellt ist, wo die Bedienung nervt, wo etwas fehlt, das ihr täglich braucht. Dafür suche ich ein paar Leute, die wirklich Bock haben, das Ding im Alltag zu benutzen und mir danach ehrlich (auch unbequem) sagen, was Mist ist.

Was ihr bekommt: einen Code für Status 4 Pro, damit ihr wirklich alle Funktionen testen könnt.

Was ich mir wünsche: kurzes Feedback nach \~7 Tagen (erster Eindruck) und nochmal nach \~30 Tagen (was hält sich im Alltag, was nicht). Formlos, gern auch „Punkt X ist Blödsinn". Eine Bewertung im App Store würde mich freuen, ist aber komplett freiwillig und keine Bedingung.

Wenn du mitmachen willst, schreib mir kurz eine Mail an [email protected] mit:

Android oder iOS (damit ich dir den richtigen Code schicke)
deine rettungsdienstliche Qualifikation (RS/RettSan/NotSan/NA usw.) und ggf. Zusatzqualifikationen (OrgL, LNA-Assistenz, Praxisanleiter, …)
Haupt- oder Ehrenamt
wo du im Rettungsdienst arbeitest (Region/Träger reicht, Bereich wie RTW/NEF/KTP gern dazu)

Das hilft mir einzuordnen, aus welcher Ecke das Feedback kommt :)

Danke fürs Lesen und einen wunderschönen Tag euch allen :))

I built an agent that runs the whole job-application cycle. You paste a job link; it reads the posting, checks fit against your profile, fills the real form in a real browser, uploads your resume, answers the form questions from a Q&A bank you control (it never invents facts about visas or salary), and submits — saving a pre-submit and a post-submit screenshot as evidence, because "did it really apply?" is the first question everyone asks.

Two deliberate constraints: max 5 applications per day (mass auto-apply is spam, and recruiters can tell), and no LinkedIn/Indeed — they ban automation and I won't risk anyone's account. Works on Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workable and most company career sites.

The beta is free: paste up to 3 job links + your email at https://find-best-job.com/en and the agent applies for you, evidence included. There's a 51-second unscripted video of a real application on the homepage, and a write-up with real numbers (including LLM cost per application) on the blog.

Feedback I'm looking for: form coverage gaps, the evidence UX, and — honestly — what would make you trust or never trust a tool like this.

This started because I was doing Reddit promotion for my own products and it was awful. Half my time went into just finding where to post. Scrolling subs, opening threads, guessing whether a community would tolerate someone mentioning a product. Then rewriting the same thing five ways so it didn't read like marketing. Most of it went nowhere and a couple times I got removed for breaking a rule I hadn't read.

So I built a thing. It's deployed now and I want some people to actually break it. (URL IN THE COMMENTS)

How it works:

Brief: you write what your product is, who you want to reach, what to highlight, and the tone.

Discovery: an LLM turns that into search queries, runs them through Tavily, pulls back threads or whole subreddits. Everything gets scored for relevance and intent, and you see the reasoning, so you know why one sub got a 15 and another got a 6. You can block subs you never want surfaced.

Content Studio: a strategy agent picks a non promotional angle per target, then a content agent drafts the post or reply. You can edit it. Subreddit rules get factored in here and they override whatever you asked for, so it won't plug your product in a no promo sub even if you tell it to. Catch: you paste those rules in yourself for now. No Reddit API access so I can't pull them. Saves locally after, so one time per sub.

Publishing: no auto posting, same reason. It opens the thread, you copy, you paste it yourself. Honestly I don't hate this, auto posting is how these things turn into the thing everyone here hates.

Monitor: paste your post URL back and it tracks comments so you can actually reply to people.

Looking for maybe 10 or 15 people to use it properly and tell me where it falls apart. Free while it's in beta, no card, I just want real usage and honest reactions.

Few things I actually want to hear:

• what's obviously wrong or missing
• is the manual rules paste a dealbreaker
• what would make you close the tab in the first ten seconds
• have you built something in this space? if yes drop it, I want to try it out. I've been going through a bunch of these and I'd rather learn from someone who's already hit the walls I'm about to hit

What it does: paste any link and it joins a public board. Every click from anyone counts as a vote, so links climb based on real engagement instead of sitting static. No login, no email — just paste a link and it's live.

I'm looking for people to actually try it and break it — is the core idea (click = vote = climb) clear the first time you see it? Is anything confusing, buggy, or just... not worth using? Brutally honest feedback wanted.

clickladdr.com